Joseph Chen
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Speech and Hearing top 2%
- Noise Effects and Management
Papers in
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 23
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 4
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 12
- Co-authors
- Vincent Lin (17 shared papers)David Shipp (13 shared papers)Julian M. Nedzelski (10 shared papers)Trung Le (10 shared papers)Lendra Friesen (5 shared papers)Andrew Dimitrijevic (6 shared papers)Hosam Amoodi (3 shared papers)Christoph Arnoldner (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Laryngoscope (6 papers)Otology & Neurotology (5 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)Cochlear Implants International (2 papers)Molecular Therapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Joseph Chen
29 papers receiving 464 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Sensory Systems 208
- Speech and Hearing 138
- Cognitive Neuroscience 279
- Otorhinolaryngology 63
- Neurology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Chen. The network helps show where Joseph Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 18 | From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment. | 2011 | 9 |
| 19 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 5 |
About Joseph Chen
Joseph Chen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing, Neurology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (23 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (12 papers), Noise Effects and Management (9 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (208 citations), Speech and Hearing (138 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (279 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (63 citations) and Neurology (68 citations). Joseph Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Lin, David Shipp, Julian M. Nedzelski, Trung Le, Lendra Friesen, Andrew Dimitrijevic, Hosam Amoodi, Christoph Arnoldner, Brandon T. Paul and John Yoo. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, Otology & Neurotology, PLoS ONE, Cochlear Implants International and Molecular Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.