Joseph Bick
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Epidemiology
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Joe GoldensonRobert B. GreifingerJanet C. Mohle‐BoetaniFrederick L. AlticeAdeeba KamarulzamanGabriel J. CulbertVeena PillaiHaider Abdulrazzaq Abed Al‐Darraji
- Topics
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers)HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMalaysiaChina
In The Last Decade
Joseph Bick
14 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Infectious Diseases 137
- Sociology and Political Science 134
- Epidemiology 132
- General Health Professions 110
- Clinical Psychology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Bick
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Bick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Bick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Bick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Bick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Bick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Bick. The network helps show where Joseph Bick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Bick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Bick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Bick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Bick. Joseph Bick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | Cryptococcal meningitis and SLE: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. | 5 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | 161 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | HIV clinical trials in correctional settings: right or retrogression? | 2 |
| 13 | Guidelines for adequacy and nutrition in peritoneal dialysis. Canadian Society of Nephrology. | 12 |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1 |
About Joseph Bick
Joseph Bick is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Virology and Pharmacy, having authored 15 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (137 citations), General Health Professions (110 citations) and Epidemiology (132 citations). Joseph Bick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and China. Frequent co-authors include Joe Goldenson, Robert B. Greifinger, Janet C. Mohle‐Boetani, Frederick L. Altice, Adeeba Kamarulzaman, Gabriel J. Culbert, Veena Pillai, Haider Abdulrazzaq Abed Al‐Darraji, E Desmond and Eric Horowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, Public Health Reports and Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.