Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to José Gaos José Gaos (= 1×)
peers
Ludwig Feuerbach
Countries citing papers authored by José Gaos
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of José Gaos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Gaos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Gaos more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Gaos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Gaos. The network helps show where José Gaos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Gaos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Gaos.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Gaos based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with José Gaos. José Gaos is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gaos, José. (2017). La filosofía de D. José Ortega y Gasset y las nuevas generaciones españolas. Revista de occidente. 9–32.
2.
Gaos, José, et al.. (2008). Introducción a la fenomenología seguida de La crítica al psicologismo en Husserl. Revista de hispanismo filosófico. 179.1 indexed citations
3.
Gaos, José, et al.. (2001). Confesiones profesionales: ; Aforística. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).
Gaos, José. (1994). Confesiones de transterrado. Revista de la Universidad de México. 49(10582). 3–9.
6.
Heidegger, Martín & José Gaos. (1993). El ser y el tiempo. Fondo de Cultura Económica eBooks.117 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Gaos, José. (1993). Introducción a "El Ser y el tiempo" de Martin Heidegger. Galiciana (Xunta de Galicia).2 indexed citations
8.
O’Gorman, Edmundo, José Gaos, Pablo González Casanova, et al.. (1992). Cultura, ideas y mentalidades. El Colegio de México eBooks.1 indexed citations
9.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich & José Gaos. (1989). Lecciones sobre la filosofía de la historia universal. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).45 indexed citations
10.
Gaos, José, et al.. (1989). La Filosofía de la Filosofía. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).
11.
Husserl, Edmund, José Gaos, & Miguel García-Baró López. (1985). Meditaciones cartesianas: introducción a la fenomenología. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).3 indexed citations
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb & José Gaos. (1976). Los caracteres de la Edad Contemporanea. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).2 indexed citations
14.
Gaos, José. (1966). La adaptación de un español a la sociedad hispanoamericana. Revista de occidente. 168–178.3 indexed citations
15.
Gaos, José, et al.. (1964). De la filosofía. Books Abroad. 38(3). 300–300.1 indexed citations
16.
Gaos, José. (1961). Ortega y Heidegger.1 indexed citations
17.
Gaos, José. (1960). Notas sobre la historiografía. Historia Mexicana. 9(4). 481–508.3 indexed citations
Gaos, José. (1955). Seminario de tesis. Diánoia Revista de Filosofía. 1(1).
20.
Gaos, José. (1954). Filosofía mexicana de nuestros días.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.