Jorie Koster-Hale
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Rebecca SaxeMarina BednyDavid Dodell‐FederLiane YoungJames DunganNir JacobyEmile BruneauHilary Richardson
- Topics
- Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jorie Koster-Hale
14 papers receiving 994 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cognitive Neuroscience 804
- Social Psychology 468
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 209
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 187
- Sociology and Political Science 102
Countries citing papers authored by Jorie Koster-Hale
This map shows the geographic impact of Jorie Koster-Hale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jorie Koster-Hale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jorie Koster-Hale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jorie Koster-Hale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jorie Koster-Hale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jorie Koster-Hale. The network helps show where Jorie Koster-Hale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jorie Koster-Hale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jorie Koster-Hale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jorie Koster-Hale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jorie Koster-Hale. Jorie Koster-Hale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 34 | |
| 3 | 69 | |
| 4 | 88 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 307 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 136 | |
| 10 | To peek and to peer: "visual" verb meanings are largely unaffected by congenital blindnsess. | 2 |
| 11 | Theory of Mind network encodes how you know what you know in blind and sighted adults. | 1 |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | Theory of Mind brain regions are sensitive to the content, not the structural complexity, of belief attributions | 5 |
| 14 | 237 |
About Jorie Koster-Hale
Jorie Koster-Hale is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (804 citations), Social Psychology (468 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (209 citations). Jorie Koster-Hale has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Saxe, Marina Bedny, David Dodell‐Feder, Liane Young, James Dungan, Nir Jacoby, Emile Bruneau, Hilary Richardson, Mika Asaba and Natalia Vélez. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.