Jorie Koster-Hale

1.7k total citations
14 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Jorie Koster-Hale is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Jorie Koster-Hale has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 1 paper in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Jorie Koster-Hale's work include Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Jorie Koster-Hale is often cited by papers focused on Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Jorie Koster-Hale collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jorie Koster-Hale's co-authors include Rebecca Saxe, Marina Bedny, David Dodell‐Feder, Liane Young, James Dungan, Nir Jacoby, Emile Bruneau, Hilary Richardson, Mika Asaba and Natalia Vélez and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Neuron.

In The Last Decade

Jorie Koster-Hale

14 papers receiving 994 citations

Peers

Jorie Koster-Hale
Jason M. Scimeca United States
Kaspar Meyer United States
Penelope L. Mavros United States
Stephan Boehm United Kingdom
Zara M. Bergström United Kingdom
Sharon Zmigrod Netherlands
Jorie Koster-Hale
Citations per year, relative to Jorie Koster-Hale Jorie Koster-Hale (= 1×) peers Tobias Schlicht

Countries citing papers authored by Jorie Koster-Hale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jorie Koster-Hale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jorie Koster-Hale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jorie Koster-Hale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jorie Koster-Hale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jorie Koster-Hale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jorie Koster-Hale. The network helps show where Jorie Koster-Hale may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jorie Koster-Hale

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jorie Koster-Hale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jorie Koster-Hale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jorie Koster-Hale. Jorie Koster-Hale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Richardson, Hilary, et al.. (2020). Reduced neural selectivity for mental states in deaf children with delayed exposure to sign language. Nature Communications. 11(1). 3246–3246. 22 indexed citations
3.
Koster-Hale, Jorie, Hilary Richardson, Natalia Vélez, et al.. (2017). Mentalizing regions represent distributed, continuous, and abstract dimensions of others' beliefs. NeuroImage. 161. 9–18. 69 indexed citations
4.
Jacoby, Nir, Emile Bruneau, Jorie Koster-Hale, & Rebecca Saxe. (2015). Localizing Pain Matrix and Theory of Mind networks with both verbal and non-verbal stimuli. NeuroImage. 126. 39–48. 88 indexed citations
5.
Chakroff, Alek, et al.. (2015). When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 11(3). 476–484. 45 indexed citations
6.
Koster-Hale, Jorie, Marina Bedny, & Rebecca Saxe. (2014). Thinking about seeing: Perceptual sources of knowledge are encoded in the theory of mind brain regions of sighted and blind adults. Cognition. 133(1). 65–78. 28 indexed citations
7.
Koster-Hale, Jorie & Rebecca Saxe. (2013). Theory of Mind: A Neural Prediction Problem. Neuron. 79(5). 836–848. 307 indexed citations
8.
Koster-Hale, Jorie & Rebecca Saxe. (2013). Functional neuroimaging of theory of mind. Oxford University Press eBooks. 132–163. 17 indexed citations
9.
Koster-Hale, Jorie, Rebecca Saxe, James Dungan, & Liane Young. (2013). Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110(14). 5648–5653. 136 indexed citations
10.
Bedny, Marina, et al.. (2012). To peek and to peer: "visual" verb meanings are largely unaffected by congenital blindnsess.. Cognitive Science. 2 indexed citations
11.
Koster-Hale, Jorie, et al.. (2012). Theory of Mind network encodes how you know what you know in blind and sighted adults.. Cognitive Science. 1 indexed citations
12.
Hackl, Michael, et al.. (2012). Quantification and ACD: Evidence from Real-Time Sentence Processing. Journal of Semantics. 29(2). 145–206. 22 indexed citations
13.
Koster-Hale, Jorie & Rebecca Saxe. (2011). Theory of Mind brain regions are sensitive to the content, not the structural complexity, of belief attributions. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 5 indexed citations
14.
Dodell‐Feder, David, Jorie Koster-Hale, Marina Bedny, & Rebecca Saxe. (2010). fMRI item analysis in a theory of mind task. NeuroImage. 55(2). 705–712. 237 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026