Joost Berkhout

1.6k total citations
46 papers, 967 citations indexed

About

Joost Berkhout is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Joost Berkhout has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 967 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Strategy and Management, 33 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Joost Berkhout's work include Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (34 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (18 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (11 papers). Joost Berkhout is often cited by papers focused on Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (34 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (18 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (11 papers). Joost Berkhout collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Russia. Joost Berkhout's co-authors include David Lowery, Marcel Hanegraaff, Caelesta Braun, Frank R. Baumgartner, Christine Mahoney, Arndt Wonka, Anne Messer, Jan Beyers, Brendan J. Carroll and Michele Crepaz and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Political Science, Journal of European Public Policy and Public Administration.

In The Last Decade

Joost Berkhout

44 papers receiving 927 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joost Berkhout Netherlands 17 814 613 357 114 85 46 967
Marcel Hanegraaff Netherlands 16 670 0.8× 447 0.7× 353 1.0× 92 0.8× 87 1.0× 55 801
Iskander De Bruycker Belgium 16 604 0.7× 501 0.8× 248 0.7× 80 0.7× 144 1.7× 34 764
Pieter Bouwen Belgium 8 673 0.8× 526 0.9× 199 0.6× 129 1.1× 26 0.3× 14 838
Gemma Mateo Austria 10 470 0.6× 393 0.6× 203 0.6× 66 0.6× 71 0.8× 15 630
Christopher Lord United Kingdom 19 430 0.5× 1.2k 2.0× 172 0.5× 48 0.4× 66 0.8× 62 1.4k
Nicole Bolleyer United Kingdom 20 242 0.3× 1.0k 1.7× 345 1.0× 71 0.6× 105 1.2× 73 1.2k
Bert Fraussen Netherlands 14 387 0.5× 298 0.5× 227 0.6× 119 1.0× 58 0.7× 32 542
Donald E. Abelson Canada 13 213 0.3× 243 0.4× 264 0.7× 45 0.4× 56 0.7× 31 523
André Mach Switzerland 16 173 0.2× 332 0.5× 289 0.8× 119 1.0× 36 0.4× 51 629
Derek J Hearl United Kingdom 4 459 0.6× 1.3k 2.1× 320 0.9× 49 0.4× 144 1.7× 10 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Joost Berkhout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joost Berkhout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost Berkhout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost Berkhout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joost Berkhout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost Berkhout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost Berkhout. The network helps show where Joost Berkhout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joost Berkhout

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joost Berkhout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joost Berkhout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joost Berkhout. Joost Berkhout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Junk, Wiebke Marie, et al.. (2024). Understanding lobbying dynamics through survey research: An introduction to the InterCov dataset. European Union Politics. 25(4). 816–831. 1 indexed citations
2.
Junk, Wiebke Marie, Joost Berkhout, Michele Crepaz, & Marcel Hanegraaff. (2023). Advocacy intelligence and competition: Assessing lobbyists' sharing of tactical knowledge in focus group interviews. Governance. 37(2). 355–373. 3 indexed citations
3.
Berkhout, Joost, Michele Crepaz, Marcel Hanegraaff, & Wiebke Marie Junk. (2023). Online focus groups as a tool to study policy professionals. Research & Politics. 10(4). 3 indexed citations
4.
Berkhout, Joost, Jan Beyers, & Marcel Hanegraaff. (2022). The Representative Potential of Interest Groups: Internal Voice in Post-Communist and Western European Countries. Politics and Governance. 11(1). 2 indexed citations
5.
Crepaz, Michele, Wiebke Marie Junk, Marcel Hanegraaff, & Joost Berkhout. (2022). Viral Lobbying. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 12 indexed citations
6.
Berkhout, Joost, et al.. (2019). Lobbying and policy conflict: explaining interest groups’ promiscuous relationships to political parties. Interest Groups & Advocacy. 9(1). 1–20. 2 indexed citations
7.
Berkhout, Joost & Marcel Hanegraaff. (2019). No borders, no bias? Comparing advocacy group populations at the national and transnational levels. Interest Groups & Advocacy. 8(3). 270–290. 7 indexed citations
8.
Berkhout, Joost, Jan Beyers, Caelesta Braun, Marcel Hanegraaff, & David Lowery. (2017). Making Inference across Mobilisation and Influence Research: Comparing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mapping of Interest Systems. Political Studies. 66(1). 43–62. 65 indexed citations
9.
Berkhout, Joost & Didier Ruedin. (2016). Why religion? Immigrant groups as objects of political claims on immigration and civic integration in Western Europe, 1995–2009. Acta Politica. 52(2). 156–178. 11 indexed citations
10.
Berkhout, Joost. (2015). LOBBYING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: INTEREST GROUPS, LOBBYING COALITIONS AND POLICY CHANGE. Public Administration. 94(1). 278–280. 1 indexed citations
11.
Berkhout, Joost. (2014). Comparing Populations of Interest Organizations: Skating on Thin Ice?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
12.
Berkhout, Joost. (2012). Claims in the News: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
13.
Berkhout, Joost. (2012). Changing Claims and Changing Frames in the Politics of Migration in Western Europe, 1995-2009. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
14.
Berkhout, Joost, et al.. (2012). Legal and Policy Situation of Immigrants: The Netherlands. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
15.
Toshkov, Dimiter, David Lowery, Brendan J. Carroll, & Joost Berkhout. (2012). Timing is everything? Organized interests and the timing of legislative activity. Interest Groups & Advocacy. 2(1). 48–70. 15 indexed citations
16.
Ruedin, Didier & Joost Berkhout. (2012). Patterns of Claims-Making on Civic Integration and Migration in Europe: Are Muslims Different?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
17.
Messer, Anne, Joost Berkhout, & David Lowery. (2010). The Density of the EU Interest System: A Test of the ESA Model. British Journal of Political Science. 41(1). 161–190. 49 indexed citations
18.
Berkhout, Joost. (2009). Interest Representation in the European Union and Beyond. European Political Science. 8(4). 469–488.
19.
Lowery, David, et al.. (2008). The European Union Interest System in Comparative Perspective: A Bridge Too Far?. West European Politics. 31(6). 1231–1252. 41 indexed citations
20.
Berkhout, Joost. (2008). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Acta Politica. 43(4). 504–507. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026