Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?
19983.8k citationsEduardo Borensztein, Jong‐Wha Lee et al.Journal of International Economicsprofile →
A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010
20122.4k citationsRobert J. Barro, Jong‐Wha Leeprofile →
International comparisons of educational attainment
19931.3k citationsRobert J. Barro, Jong‐Wha Leeprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Jong‐Wha Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jong‐Wha Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jong‐Wha Lee more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jong‐Wha Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jong‐Wha Lee. The network helps show where Jong‐Wha Lee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jong‐Wha Lee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jong‐Wha Lee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jong‐Wha Lee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jong‐Wha Lee. Jong‐Wha Lee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Barro, Robert J. & Jong‐Wha Lee. (2015). Education Matters: Global Schooling Gains from the 19th to the 21st Century. OUP Catalogue.4 indexed citations
6.
Lee, Jong‐Wha, et al.. (2015). Rebalancing for sustainable growth : Asia's postcrisis challenge. Springer eBooks.1 indexed citations
7.
Barro, Robert J. & Jong‐Wha Lee. (2010). A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010. SSRN Electronic Journal.150 indexed citations
Capannelli, Giovanni, Jong‐Wha Lee, & Peter A. Petri. (2010). Economic Interdependence in Asia: Developing Indicators for Regional Integration and Cooperation. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Capannelli, Giovanni, Jong‐Wha Lee, & Peter A. Petri. (2009). Developing Indicators for Regional Economic Integration and Cooperation. Econstor (Econstor).23 indexed citations
Ahn, Sanghoon, Jong‐Wha Lee, & 日本銀行金融研究所. (2007). Integration and Growth in East Asia. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 25. 131–168.3 indexed citations
13.
Kim, Soyoung, Jong‐Wha Lee, & Kwanho Shin. (2006). Regional and Global Financial Integration in East Asia. MPRA Paper.7 indexed citations
14.
Lee, Jong‐Wha, et al.. (2005). Sources of Economic Growth in the Korean Industries, 1970-2001. 53(2). 99–143.1 indexed citations
15.
Barro, Robert J. & Jong‐Wha Lee. (2003). Growth and investment in East Asia before and after the financial crisis. Seoul Journal of Economics. 16.7 indexed citations
Borensztein, Eduardo, et al.. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?. Journal of International Economics. 45(1). 115–135.3824 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Boone, Peter, Jong‐Wha Lee, & Jeffrey D. Sachs. (1993). International Linkages of the Korean Economy. Seoul Journal of Economics. 6.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.