Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits
2010747 citationsSimon G. Potts, Jonathan Storkey et al.profile →
An ecological future for weed science to sustain crop production and the environment. A review
2020211 citationsChloe MacLaren, Jonathan Storkey et al.profile →
Agricultural fertilisers contribute substantially to microplastic concentrations in UK soils
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Storkey
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Storkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Storkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Storkey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Storkey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Storkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Storkey. The network helps show where Jonathan Storkey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Storkey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Storkey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Storkey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Storkey. Jonathan Storkey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Metcalfe, Helen, Alice E. Milne, A.J. Murdoch, & Jonathan Storkey. (2017). Does variable soil pH have an effect on the within-field distribution of A. Myosuroides?. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).3 indexed citations
15.
Macdonald, A. J., D. S. Powlson, P. R. Poulton, et al.. (2015). The Rothamsted Long-term Experiments. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).5 indexed citations
16.
Baverstock, J., et al.. (2014). Field margins for biocontrol and biodiversity across crop rotations: overview of the aims and approaches of Defra project IF01122. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).2 indexed citations
17.
Lutman, P. J. W., et al.. (2009). Abundance of weeds in arable fields in southern England in 2007/08. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).6 indexed citations
18.
Storkey, Jonathan, Mikhail A. Semenov, & Paul Neve. (2008). Assessing the impact of climate change on the assembly and function of weed communities. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).1 indexed citations
19.
Storkey, Jonathan. (2001). A physiological approach to understanding weed competition. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).2 indexed citations
20.
Storkey, Jonathan, J. Cussans, & P. J. W. Lutman. (2000). Visual assessment of weed ground cover to predict yield loss. Is this a practical alternative to the measurement of leaf area?. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.