Jonathan Shanklin

849 total citations
27 papers, 340 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Shanklin is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Shanklin has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 340 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Atmospheric Science, 18 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 3 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Shanklin's work include Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (19 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (17 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (12 papers). Jonathan Shanklin is often cited by papers focused on Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (19 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (17 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (12 papers). Jonathan Shanklin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ukraine. Jonathan Shanklin's co-authors include A. E. Jones, Steve Colwell, H. K. Roscoe, H. K. Roscoe, Andréa Pazmiño, F. Lefèvre, J. Kuttippurath, Jean‐Pierre Pommereau, F. Goutail and John F. Turner and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences and Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Shanklin

26 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Shanklin United Kingdom 8 256 222 48 45 23 27 340
J. Stähelin Switzerland 5 282 1.1× 215 1.0× 9 0.2× 11 0.2× 12 0.5× 6 315
J. Mioduszewski United States 10 286 1.1× 155 0.7× 27 0.6× 35 0.8× 3 0.1× 12 341
K. Wodzicki United States 5 258 1.0× 277 1.2× 30 0.6× 88 2.0× 5 0.2× 10 337
Panini Dasgupta India 7 193 0.8× 268 1.2× 27 0.6× 159 3.5× 6 0.3× 14 321
Yixiong Lu China 10 294 1.1× 292 1.3× 16 0.3× 52 1.2× 26 1.1× 43 368
P. J. Gleckler United States 10 302 1.2× 365 1.6× 26 0.5× 183 4.1× 6 0.3× 13 425
Thomas Krismer Germany 8 278 1.1× 236 1.1× 8 0.2× 45 1.0× 62 2.7× 9 313
Natalia Mazei Russia 9 151 0.6× 54 0.2× 99 2.1× 35 0.8× 6 0.3× 48 237
Renu Joseph United States 9 345 1.3× 351 1.6× 47 1.0× 72 1.6× 3 0.1× 13 476
Sheeba Nettukandy Chenoli Malaysia 10 212 0.8× 180 0.8× 35 0.7× 63 1.4× 4 0.2× 20 290

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Shanklin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Shanklin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Shanklin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Shanklin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Shanklin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Shanklin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Shanklin. The network helps show where Jonathan Shanklin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Shanklin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Shanklin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Shanklin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Shanklin. Jonathan Shanklin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhang, Lily, Susan Solomon, Kane A. Stone, et al.. (2021). On the use of satellite observations to fill gaps in the Halley station total ozone record. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 21(12). 9829–9838. 1 indexed citations
2.
Klekociuk, Andrew, Matthew B. Tully, Paul B. Krummel, et al.. (2020). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2017. Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth System Science. 69(1). 29–51. 6 indexed citations
3.
Hill, M. O., Christopher Preston, & Jonathan Shanklin. (2020). Geographical patterns in the flora of Cambridgeshire (v.c.29). NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 2(4). 285–308. 1 indexed citations
4.
Krummel, Paul B., Andrew Klekociuk, Matthew B. Tully, et al.. (2020). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2014. Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth System Science. 69(1). 1–15. 3 indexed citations
5.
Campanelli, Monica, Víctor Estellés, Steve Colwell, Jonathan Shanklin, & Shantikumar S. Ningombam. (2015). Analysis of aerosol optical properties from continuous sun-sky radiometer measurements at Halley and Rothera, Antarctica over seven years. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 2768. 1 indexed citations
6.
Klekociuk, Andrew, Paul B. Krummel, Matthew B. Tully, et al.. (2015). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2013. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 65(2). 247–266. 4 indexed citations
7.
Klekociuk, Andrew, Matthew B. Tully, Paul B. Krummel, et al.. (2014). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2011. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 64(4). 293–311. 10 indexed citations
8.
Klekociuk, Andrew, Matthew B. Tully, Paul B. Krummel, et al.. (2014). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2012. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 64(4). 313–330. 5 indexed citations
9.
Meredith, Michael, et al.. (2014). Assessment for Decision-Makers: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2014. 22 indexed citations
10.
Kuttippurath, J., F. Lefèvre, Jean‐Pierre Pommereau, et al.. (2013). Antarctic ozone loss in 1979–2010: first sign of ozone recovery. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 13(3). 1625–1635. 59 indexed citations
11.
Klekociuk, Andrew, Matthew B. Tully, Simon P. Alexander, et al.. (2011). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2010. 61(4). 253–267. 18 indexed citations
12.
Shanklin, Jonathan. (2010). Reflections on the ozone hole. Nature. 465(7294). 34–35. 21 indexed citations
13.
Evtushevsky, Oleksandr, et al.. (2009). Total ozone dependence of the difference between the empirically corrected EP-TOMS and high-latitude station datasets. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 30(15-16). 4283–4294. 9 indexed citations
14.
Shanklin, Jonathan, et al.. (2009). Meteorological observing and climate in the British Antarctic Territory and South Georgia: Part 1. Weather. 64(5). 127–134. 7 indexed citations
15.
Tully, Matthew B., Andrew Klekociuk, Stuart Henderson, et al.. (2008). The 2007 Antarctic ozone hole. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 57(3). 279–298. 5 indexed citations
16.
Shanklin, Jonathan & Steve Colwell. (2005). The UK's hottest day on record. Weather. 60(1). 25–25. 2 indexed citations
17.
Roscoe, H. K., Jonathan Shanklin, & Steve Colwell. (2005). Has the Antarctic Vortex Split before 2002?. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 62(3). 581–588. 46 indexed citations
18.
Shanklin, Jonathan. (2004). Book Review: AN INTRODUCTION TO GALAXIES AND COSMOLOGY / Cambridge University Press, 2004. Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 114(6). 362. 1 indexed citations
19.
Jones, A. E. & Jonathan Shanklin. (1995). Continued decline of total ozone over Halley, Antarctica, since 1985. Nature. 376(6539). 409–411. 90 indexed citations
20.
Shanklin, Jonathan. (1985). Measurements of solar and terrestrial radiation at King Edward Point, South Georgia, 1973-1981. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026