Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Shanklin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Shanklin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Shanklin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Shanklin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Shanklin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Shanklin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Shanklin. The network helps show where Jonathan Shanklin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Shanklin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Shanklin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Shanklin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Shanklin. Jonathan Shanklin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Klekociuk, Andrew, Matthew B. Tully, Paul B. Krummel, et al.. (2020). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2017. Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth System Science. 69(1). 29–51.6 indexed citations
Krummel, Paul B., Andrew Klekociuk, Matthew B. Tully, et al.. (2020). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2014. Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth System Science. 69(1). 1–15.3 indexed citations
5.
Campanelli, Monica, Víctor Estellés, Steve Colwell, Jonathan Shanklin, & Shantikumar S. Ningombam. (2015). Analysis of aerosol optical properties from continuous sun-sky radiometer measurements at Halley and Rothera, Antarctica over seven years. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 2768.1 indexed citations
6.
Klekociuk, Andrew, Paul B. Krummel, Matthew B. Tully, et al.. (2015). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2013. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 65(2). 247–266.4 indexed citations
7.
Klekociuk, Andrew, Matthew B. Tully, Paul B. Krummel, et al.. (2014). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2011. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 64(4). 293–311.10 indexed citations
8.
Klekociuk, Andrew, Matthew B. Tully, Paul B. Krummel, et al.. (2014). The Antarctic ozone hole during 2012. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 64(4). 313–330.5 indexed citations
9.
Meredith, Michael, et al.. (2014). Assessment for Decision-Makers: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2014.22 indexed citations
Tully, Matthew B., Andrew Klekociuk, Stuart Henderson, et al.. (2008). The 2007 Antarctic ozone hole. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 57(3). 279–298.5 indexed citations
Roscoe, H. K., Jonathan Shanklin, & Steve Colwell. (2005). Has the Antarctic Vortex Split before 2002?. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 62(3). 581–588.46 indexed citations
18.
Shanklin, Jonathan. (2004). Book Review: AN INTRODUCTION TO GALAXIES AND COSMOLOGY / Cambridge University Press, 2004. Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 114(6). 362.1 indexed citations
Shanklin, Jonathan. (1985). Measurements of solar and terrestrial radiation at King Edward Point, South Georgia, 1973-1981. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.