Jonathan Rocher

945 total citations
9 papers, 615 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Rocher is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Rocher has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 615 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 2 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Rocher's work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers). Jonathan Rocher is often cited by papers focused on Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers). Jonathan Rocher collaborates with scholars based in Greece, France and Belgium. Jonathan Rocher's co-authors include Mairi Sakellariadou, Anupam Mazumdar, Rachel Jeannerot, Sébastien Clesse, Christophe Ringeval, Andy R. Terrel and James Bergstra and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Reports and Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Rocher

9 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jonathan Rocher Greece	7	578	510	33	31	23	9	615
Rachel Jeannerot United Kingdom	10	619 1.1×	625 1.2×	21 0.6×	24 0.8×	26 1.1×	21	711
Louis Leblond United States	12	592 1.0×	529 1.0×	68 2.1×	25 0.8×	71 3.1×	15	619
Johanna Karouby Canada	11	478 0.8×	363 0.7×	57 1.7×	47 1.5×	64 2.8×	14	524
Roland de Putter United States	17	716 1.2×	586 1.1×	56 1.7×	21 0.7×	29 1.3×	23	818
Koushik Dutta India	16	631 1.1×	532 1.0×	31 0.9×	44 1.4×	27 1.2×	46	675
Li-Zhi Fang United States	7	346 0.6×	275 0.5×	60 1.8×	40 1.3×	11 0.5×	7	361
Thorsten Battefeld United States	12	441 0.8×	364 0.7×	67 2.0×	29 0.9×	14 0.6×	22	455
Kaloian D. Lozanov United States	15	622 1.1×	472 0.9×	54 1.6×	63 2.0×	68 3.0×	20	671
E. Ruiz Morales Spain	10	693 1.2×	660 1.3×	17 0.5×	83 2.7×	17 0.7×	13	870
Marieke Postma Netherlands	13	610 1.1×	629 1.2×	46 1.4×	33 1.1×	51 2.2×	33	701

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Rocher

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Rocher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Rocher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Rocher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Rocher

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Rocher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Rocher. The network helps show where Jonathan Rocher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Rocher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Rocher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Rocher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Rocher. Jonathan Rocher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Terrel, Andy R., et al.. (2014). Preface. Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences. 1–1. 1 indexed citations

2.

Mazumdar, Anupam & Jonathan Rocher. (2010). Particle physics models of inflation and curvaton scenarios. Physics Reports. 497(4-5). 85–215. 205 indexed citations

3.

Clesse, Sébastien, Christophe Ringeval, & Jonathan Rocher. (2009). Fractal initial conditions and natural parameter values in hybrid inflation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 80(12). 27 indexed citations

4.

Clesse, Sébastien & Jonathan Rocher. (2009). Avoiding the blue spectrum and the fine-tuning of initial conditions in hybrid inflation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 79(10). 28 indexed citations

5.

Rocher, Jonathan & Mairi Sakellariadou. (2005). D-Term Inflation, Cosmic Strings, and Consistency with Cosmic Microwave Background Measurements. Physical Review Letters. 94(1). 11303–11303. 42 indexed citations

6.

Rocher, Jonathan & Mairi Sakellariadou. (2005). Constraints on supersymmetric grand unified theories from cosmology. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2005(3). 4–4. 47 indexed citations

7.

Rocher, Jonathan & Mairi Sakellariadou. (2004). Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theories and Cosmology. Research Portal (King's College London). 11 indexed citations

8.

Rocher, Jonathan & Mairi Sakellariadou. (2004). The true story about the cosmological r\^ole of cosmic strings. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations

9.

Jeannerot, Rachel, Jonathan Rocher, & Mairi Sakellariadou. (2003). How generic is cosmic string formation in supersymmetric grand unified theories. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 68(10). 252 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact