Jonathan Piper

1.2k total citations
43 papers, 901 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Piper is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Piper has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 901 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 13 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 12 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Piper's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (12 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (10 papers). Jonathan Piper is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (12 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (10 papers). Jonathan Piper collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Jonathan Piper's co-authors include Robert J. Plemmons, V. Paúl Pauca, Aaron Nelson, Walter Choi, Nitin Ohri, Maria Werner‐Wasik, Patrick T. Kang, Ying Xiao, Yoshio Arai and Fábio Almeida and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Medical Physics.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Piper

39 papers receiving 866 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Piper United States 12 343 210 183 163 155 43 901
Imants Svalbe Australia 15 260 0.8× 72 0.3× 157 0.9× 255 1.6× 187 1.2× 63 748
Rafael Wiemker Germany 17 396 1.2× 120 0.6× 343 1.9× 298 1.8× 34 0.2× 67 895
Zhiheng Wang China 20 335 1.0× 72 0.3× 246 1.3× 686 4.2× 388 2.5× 75 1.5k
Zheng Miao China 12 119 0.3× 128 0.6× 53 0.3× 441 2.7× 51 0.3× 28 863
Laurent Guigues France 9 417 1.2× 57 0.3× 303 1.7× 254 1.6× 438 2.8× 16 951
Qin‐Sheng Chen United States 8 185 0.5× 106 0.5× 136 0.7× 346 2.1× 175 1.1× 15 665
Lei Xiang China 14 829 2.4× 96 0.5× 55 0.3× 519 3.2× 132 0.9× 32 1.5k
Du‐Yih Tsai Japan 14 485 1.4× 131 0.6× 450 2.5× 317 1.9× 199 1.3× 59 1.2k
M.L. Silbiger United States 12 431 1.3× 110 0.5× 117 0.6× 709 4.3× 22 0.1× 19 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Piper. The network helps show where Jonathan Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Piper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Piper. Jonathan Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dijk, Judith, et al.. (2024). Disruptive imaging field trial (DRIFT) on computational and compressive imaging systems. 31–31. 2 indexed citations
2.
Laurenzis, Martin, et al.. (2024). Disruptive imaging field trial (DRIFT) on computational and compressive imaging systems. Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 10–10. 1 indexed citations
3.
Piper, Jonathan, et al.. (2022). Signal to Noise Ratio of a Coded Slit Hyperspectral Sensor. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(4). 752–764. 2 indexed citations
4.
Giganti, Francesco, Jonathan Piper, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, et al.. (2021). Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program. European Radiology Experimental. 5(1). 48–48. 18 indexed citations
5.
Giganti, Francesco, Clare Allen, Jonathan Piper, et al.. (2018). Sequential prostate MRI reporting in men on active surveillance: initial experience of a dedicated PRECISE software program. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 57. 34–39. 11 indexed citations
6.
Breault, Christopher, Jonathan Piper, Abhinay D. Joshi, et al.. (2017). Correlation between two methods of florbetapir PET quantitative analysis.. PubMed. 7(3). 84–91. 9 indexed citations
7.
Nelson, Aaron, et al.. (2016). Evaluation of a quantitative metric, Volumetric Statistical Amyloid Burden (VSAB), for Florbetapir PET, to classify amyloid positive and negative subjects using a cutoff derived from an independent dataset. 57. 511–511. 1 indexed citations
8.
Piper, Jonathan. (2015). TU-PIS-Exhibit Hall-2: Deformable Image Registration, Contour Propagation, and Dose Mapping inMIM Maestro - MIM Software. Medical Physics. 42(6Part33). 3614–3614. 2 indexed citations
9.
Piper, Jonathan, et al.. (2014). Comparison of 2 Atlas-Based Segmentation Methods for Head and Neck Cancer With RTOG-Defined Lymph Node Levels. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 90(1). S882–S882. 1 indexed citations
10.
Nelson, Aaron, et al.. (2013). Evaluation of an automated atlas-based method for DaTscan™ analysis. Cancer Cell International. 54(1). 2068–2068. 1 indexed citations
11.
Werner‐Wasik, Maria, Patrick T. Kang, Walter Choi, et al.. (2013). Comparison of PET Contouring Methods in Patients With Early-Stage Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Pathologic–Imaging Correlation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 87(2). S540–S540.
12.
Piper, Jonathan, et al.. (2013). A Novel Framework for User-Intervened Correction of Deformable Registration. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 87(2). S144–S144. 6 indexed citations
13.
Piper, Jonathan, et al.. (2012). SU‐E‐J‐106: Atlas‐Based Segmentation: Evaluation of a Multi‐Atlas Approach for Lung Cancer. Medical Physics. 39(6Part7). 3677–3677. 11 indexed citations
14.
Werner‐Wasik, Maria, Walter Choi, Yoshio Arai, et al.. (2011). What Is the Best Way to Contour Lung Tumors on PET Scans? Multiobserver Validation of a Gradient-Based Method Using a NSCLC Digital PET Phantom. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 82(3). 1164–1171. 175 indexed citations
15.
Hu, Kenneth S., et al.. (2009). Automatic Contouring of Vital Swallowing Structures using an Atlas-based Segmentation Method: A Time Saving and Toxicity Assessment. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 75(3). S392–S392. 1 indexed citations
16.
Piper, Jonathan, et al.. (2009). PET tumor segmentation: Validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC PET phantom. 50. 1659–1659. 7 indexed citations
17.
Chen, Tong, Peter Yuen, Kan Hong, et al.. (2009). Remote sensing of stress using electro-optics imaging technique. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7486. 748606–748606. 11 indexed citations
18.
Yuen, Peter, Tong Chen, Kan Hong, et al.. (2009). Remote detection of stress using hyperspectral imaging technique. P21–P21. 10 indexed citations
19.
Pauca, V. Paúl, Jonathan Piper, & Robert J. Plemmons. (2005). Nonnegative matrix factorization for spectral data analysis. Linear Algebra and its Applications. 416(1). 29–47. 413 indexed citations
20.
Piper, Jonathan, et al.. (2004). Object Characterization from Spectral Data Using Nonnegative Factorization and Information Theory. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026