Jonathan Pearce

1.8k total citations
59 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Jonathan Pearce is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Pearce has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Environmental Engineering, 18 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 13 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Pearce's work include CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (40 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (12 papers) and Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (11 papers). Jonathan Pearce is often cited by papers focused on CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (40 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (12 papers) and Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (11 papers). Jonathan Pearce collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Italy. Jonathan Pearce's co-authors include Christopher A. Rochelle, K. Bateman, Julia M. West, A. E. Milodowski, Steven W Holloway, Aldre Jorge Morais Barros, Pauline Smedley, David Macdonald, Hugo B. Nicolli and D.G. Kinniburgh and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Energy Conversion and Management and Géotechnique.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Pearce

56 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Pearce United Kingdom 19 742 434 284 215 188 59 1.3k
F.A. Spane United States 15 900 1.2× 294 0.7× 271 1.0× 282 1.3× 140 0.7× 27 1.2k
Jean‐Michel Lemieux Canada 24 722 1.0× 302 0.7× 159 0.6× 228 1.1× 179 1.0× 66 1.7k
Andreas Dahmke Germany 26 1.0k 1.4× 703 1.6× 267 0.9× 211 1.0× 256 1.4× 102 2.3k
Dirk Kirste Canada 18 828 1.1× 410 0.9× 366 1.3× 214 1.0× 419 2.2× 57 1.5k
D.J. Noy United Kingdom 18 738 1.0× 200 0.5× 322 1.1× 263 1.2× 213 1.1× 49 1.1k
Niels Hartog Netherlands 24 708 1.0× 215 0.5× 169 0.6× 152 0.7× 128 0.7× 65 1.5k
Diana H. Bacon United States 22 1.2k 1.6× 261 0.6× 533 1.9× 138 0.6× 313 1.7× 66 1.6k
F. Quattrocchi Italy 22 542 0.7× 264 0.6× 151 0.5× 535 2.5× 305 1.6× 81 1.4k
Jean M. Bahr United States 20 675 0.9× 163 0.4× 147 0.5× 155 0.7× 70 0.4× 43 1.1k
Xing Liang China 25 594 0.8× 223 0.5× 286 1.0× 178 0.8× 528 2.8× 116 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Pearce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Pearce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Pearce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Pearce. The network helps show where Jonathan Pearce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Pearce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Pearce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Pearce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Pearce. Jonathan Pearce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rushton, Jeremy, et al.. (2020). Red-bed bleaching in a CO2 storage analogue: Insights from Entrada Sandstone fracture-hosted mineralization. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 90(1). 48–66. 10 indexed citations
2.
Akhurst, Maxine, et al.. (2017). Assessing Interactions between Multiple Geological CO2 Storage Sites to Optimize Capacity in Regionally Extensive Storage Sandstones. Energy Procedia. 114. 4571–4582. 5 indexed citations
3.
Hannis, Sarah, Jiemin Lu, Andy Chadwick, et al.. (2017). CO2 Storage in Depleted or Depleting Oil and Gas Fields: What can We Learn from Existing Projects?. Energy Procedia. 114. 5680–5690. 81 indexed citations
4.
Bond, Clare E., Gareth Johnson, Nigel Hicks, et al.. (2017). The physical characteristics of a CO 2 seeping fault: The implications of fracture permeability for carbon capture and storage integrity. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 61. 49–60. 49 indexed citations
5.
Pearce, Jonathan, Maxine Akhurst, Carsten M. Nielsen, et al.. (2015). SiteChar – Methodology for a Fit-for-Purpose Assessment of CO2Storage Sites in Europe. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles. 70(4). 531–554. 8 indexed citations
6.
Bentham, Michelle, et al.. (2014). Managing CO2 Storage Resources in a Mature CCS Future. Energy Procedia. 63. 5310–5324. 6 indexed citations
7.
Audigane, Pascal, Stephen Brown, Peter Frykman, et al.. (2013). ULTimateCO2: A FP7 European Project Dedicated to the Understanding of the Long Term Fate of Geologically Stored CO2. Energy Procedia. 37. 4655–4664. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hicks, Nigel, et al.. (2013). The Proposed CO2 Test Injection Project in South Africa. Energy Procedia. 37. 6489–6501. 5 indexed citations
9.
Pearce, Jonathan, et al.. (2013). How to Submit a CO2 Storage Permit: Identifying Appropriate Geological Site Characterisation to Meet European Regulatory Requirements. Energy Procedia. 37. 7783–7792. 3 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Wenying, et al.. (2011). Carbon capture and storage in China — main findings from China-UK Near Zero Emissions Coal (NZEC) initiative. Energy Procedia. 4. 5956–5965. 14 indexed citations
11.
Maul, P.R., Richard Metcalfe, Jonathan Pearce, David Savage, & Julia M. West. (2007). Performance assessments for the geological storage of carbon dioxide: Learning from the radioactive waste disposal experience. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 1(4). 444–455. 24 indexed citations
13.
Pearce, Jonathan, et al.. (2006). The objectives and design of generic monitoring protocols for CO2 storage. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 6 indexed citations
14.
West, Julia M., Jonathan Pearce, Michelle Bentham, & P.R. Maul. (2005). Issue profile: environmental issues and the geological storage of CO2. European Environment. 15(4). 250–259. 41 indexed citations
15.
Smedley, Pauline, D.G. Kinniburgh, David Macdonald, et al.. (2005). Arsenic associations in sediments from the loess aquifer of La Pampa, Argentina. Applied Geochemistry. 20(5). 989–1016. 189 indexed citations
16.
McGill, Rona A. R., et al.. (2003). Contaminant Source Apportionment by Pimms Lead Isotope Analysis and Sem-Image Analysis. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 25(1). 25–32. 16 indexed citations
17.
Pearce, Jonathan, Edward Hough, G. M. Williams, et al.. (2001). Sediment-filled fractures in Triassic sandstones : pathways or barriers to contaminant migration?. 2 indexed citations
18.
Smedley, Pauline, et al.. (2000). Arsenic and other quality problems in groundwater from northern La Pampa Province, Argentina. 10 indexed citations
19.
Bateman, K., et al.. (1999). Experimental simulation of the alkaline disturbed zone around a cementitious radioactive waste repository: numerical modelling and column experiments. Geological Society London Special Publications. 157(1). 183–194. 14 indexed citations
20.
Pearce, Jonathan, Simon J. Kemp, & V. Hards. (1998). The mineralogy and petrography of the Lambeth Group from the London and Hampshire Basins. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026