Jonathan Parker

2.2k total citations
126 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Jonathan Parker is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Parker has authored 126 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 110 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 62 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 42 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Parker's work include High Temperature Alloys and Creep (70 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (46 papers) and Fatigue and fracture mechanics (42 papers). Jonathan Parker is often cited by papers focused on High Temperature Alloys and Creep (70 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (46 papers) and Fatigue and fracture mechanics (42 papers). Jonathan Parker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Jonathan Parker's co-authors include B. Wilshire, N. T. Williams, John Siefert, L. Baker, Richard Holliday, T. B. Jones, R. W. Evans, R.C. Thomson, David J. Walters and Xin Xu and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Materials Science and Engineering A and Fuel.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Parker

112 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Parker United Kingdom 24 1.6k 739 617 261 184 126 1.8k
C. R. Das India 24 1.5k 0.9× 601 0.8× 845 1.4× 418 1.6× 139 0.8× 114 1.8k
B.K. Choudhary India 29 1.8k 1.1× 1.0k 1.4× 1.1k 1.8× 294 1.1× 169 0.9× 87 2.0k
Karel Obrtlík Czechia 24 1.5k 1.0× 1.1k 1.4× 1.0k 1.7× 344 1.3× 307 1.7× 95 1.9k
Guo Yuan China 22 1.4k 0.9× 520 0.7× 1.0k 1.6× 246 0.9× 172 0.9× 154 1.6k
T. Foecke United States 18 809 0.5× 665 0.9× 854 1.4× 234 0.9× 102 0.6× 52 1.3k
D.L. Klarstrom United States 25 1.2k 0.8× 761 1.0× 605 1.0× 96 0.4× 284 1.5× 77 1.5k
Soo Woo Nam South Korea 22 1.3k 0.8× 468 0.6× 745 1.2× 174 0.7× 358 1.9× 106 1.5k
P. Parameswaran India 27 2.0k 1.2× 976 1.3× 1.0k 1.7× 512 2.0× 250 1.4× 114 2.4k
Woei‐Shyan Lee Taiwan 19 783 0.5× 587 0.8× 897 1.5× 99 0.4× 169 0.9× 48 1.3k
Martin Petrenec Czechia 17 687 0.4× 490 0.7× 514 0.8× 168 0.6× 106 0.6× 69 968

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Parker. The network helps show where Jonathan Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Parker. Jonathan Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Martínez, Gerardo, Hao Shang, Christopher P. Jones, et al.. (2025). Microstructural parameters associated with cavity nucleation in martensitic Grade 91 steel under creep conditions. Materialia. 44. 102599–102599.
3.
Parker, Jonathan, et al.. (2025). Virtual failure assessment diagrams for hydrogen transmission pipelines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 149. 149984–149984. 3 indexed citations
4.
Parker, Jonathan, et al.. (2025). Tailored heat treatments to characterise the fracture resistance of critical weld regions in hydrogen transmission pipelines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 192. 152347–152347.
5.
Parker, Jonathan, et al.. (2024). A computational framework to predict weld integrity and microstructural heterogeneity: Application to hydrogen transmission. Materials & Design. 249. 113533–113533. 8 indexed citations
6.
Mandal, Tushar Kanti, et al.. (2024). Computational predictions of weld structural integrity in hydrogen transport pipelines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 136. 923–937. 21 indexed citations
7.
Robertson, H, Dragana Milojković, Nauman M. Butt, et al.. (2024). Expectations and outcomes of varying treatment strategies for CML presenting during pregnancy. British Journal of Haematology. 205(3). 947–955. 6 indexed citations
8.
Takahashi, Yukio, et al.. (2024). Creep-Fatigue Life Evaluation for Grade 91 Steels with Various Origins and Service Histories. Metals. 14(2). 148–148.
9.
Xu, Xin, John Siefert, Jonathan Parker, & R.C. Thomson. (2020). Localised creep cavitation on boron nitride in the heat affected zone of 9% Cr tempered martensitic steel welds. Materials & Design. 196. 109046–109046. 15 indexed citations
10.
West, Geoff, et al.. (2013). The Effect of Post Weld Heat Treatment on the Creep Behaviour and Microstructural Evolution in Grade 92 Steel Welds for Steam Pipe Applications. Advances in materials technology for fossil power plants :. 84666. 615–626. 1 indexed citations
11.
Parker, Jonathan. (2013). Creep Cavitation in CSEF Steels. Advances in materials technology for fossil power plants :. 6 indexed citations
12.
Parker, Jonathan, Kent Coleman, John Siefert, & John Shingledecker. (2012). Challenges with NDE and Weld Repair of Creep Strength Enhanced Ferritic Steels. AM&P Technical Articles. 170(10). 20–22. 1 indexed citations
13.
Parker, Jonathan. (2012). In-service behaviour of creep strength enhanced ferritic steels Grade 91 and Grade 92 – Part 2 weld issues. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 114-115. 76–87. 30 indexed citations
14.
Parker, Jonathan, et al.. (2001). The high-temperature performance of nickel-based transition joints. Materials Science and Engineering A. 299(1-2). 164–173. 24 indexed citations
15.
Parker, Jonathan, et al.. (2001). Forming characteristics of coated products for packaging applications. Ironmaking & Steelmaking Processes Products and Applications. 28(4). 297–304. 1 indexed citations
16.
Holliday, Richard, Jonathan Parker, & N. T. Williams. (1996). Relative contribution of electrode tip growth mechanisms in spot welding zinc coated steels. 4(37). 186–193. 19 indexed citations
17.
Parker, Jonathan, et al.. (1996). Deformation processes during disc bend loading. Materials Science and Technology. 12(2). 163–170. 4 indexed citations
18.
Parker, Jonathan, et al.. (1993). Measurement of Critical Properties in 2 1/4Cr1Mo Steel Using Miniature Disc Testing Procedures. Key engineering materials. 86-87. 17–24. 2 indexed citations
19.
Parker, Jonathan & B. Wilshire. (1992). Non-destructive life assessment of high temperature components and weldments. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 50(1-3). 337–347. 4 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Jonathan & B. Wilshire. (1979). Anomalous primary creep behaviour of dilute aluminium-silicon alloys. Scripta Metallurgica. 13(8). 669–671. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026