Jonathan N. Stea

953 total citations
18 papers, 648 citations indexed

About

Jonathan N. Stea is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan N. Stea has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 648 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Pharmacology and 6 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Jonathan N. Stea's work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (5 papers). Jonathan N. Stea is often cited by papers focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (5 papers). Jonathan N. Stea collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Jonathan N. Stea's co-authors include David C. Hodgins, Jon E. Grant, Linda Nguyen, Tony Toneatto, Lisa C. Vettese, Jenny Jing Wang, Michael J. Lambert, Igor Yakovenko, Tak Fung and Hyoun S. Kim and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Cognitive Therapy and Research and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan N. Stea

15 papers receiving 618 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jonathan N. Stea Canada	9	543	125	103	99	64	18	648
Sarah Ring‐Kurtz United States	12	416 0.8×	72 0.6×	72 0.7×	174 1.8×	64 1.0×	17	584
Guo Song Singapore	15	217 0.4×	65 0.5×	106 1.0×	121 1.2×	68 1.1×	44	501
Igor Yakovenko Canada	12	379 0.7×	105 0.8×	96 0.9×	27 0.3×	44 0.7×	34	546
Mark van der Maas Canada	14	320 0.6×	128 1.0×	91 0.9×	36 0.4×	109 1.7×	43	528
S.P.J. van Alphen Netherlands	16	860 1.6×	224 1.8×	54 0.5×	77 0.8×	47 0.7×	104	998
T. S. Jaisoorya India	14	441 0.8×	85 0.7×	58 0.6×	99 1.0×	46 0.7×	50	627
Melinda J. Henderson United States	10	233 0.4×	45 0.4×	144 1.4×	58 0.6×	87 1.4×	11	398
Ashley C. Helle United States	12	344 0.6×	73 0.6×	60 0.6×	112 1.1×	25 0.4×	33	493
Mads Uffe Pedersen Denmark	10	172 0.3×	50 0.4×	114 1.1×	47 0.5×	82 1.3×	44	418
Tashia Petker Canada	10	145 0.3×	67 0.5×	101 1.0×	91 0.9×	38 0.6×	14	440

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan N. Stea

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan N. Stea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan N. Stea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan N. Stea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan N. Stea

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan N. Stea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan N. Stea. The network helps show where Jonathan N. Stea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan N. Stea

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan N. Stea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan N. Stea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan N. Stea. Jonathan N. Stea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Zenone, Marco, Jonathan N. Stea, Yuri Quintana, et al.. (2025). Do you have depression? A summative content analysis of mental health-related content on TikTok. Digital Health. 11. 599940774–599940774.

Stea, Jonathan N. & Stephen Hupp. (2023). Investigating Clinical Psychology.

Black, Tyler, et al.. (2023). Commentary: School closures, the pandemic, and pediatric mental health: Scrutinizing the evidence.. PubMed. 32(2). 71–78. 7 indexed citations

Hodgins, David C., et al.. (2022). Promoting self-change in cannabis use disorder: Findings from a randomized trial. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 13. 1015443–1015443.

Marshall, Tyler, Elizabeth N. Kinnard, Kärin Olson, et al.. (2021). Treatment options and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder: A scoping review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 135. 108646–108646. 19 indexed citations

Hodgins, David C. & Jonathan N. Stea. (2018). Insights from individuals successfully recovered from cannabis use disorder: natural versus treatment-assisted recoveries and abstinent versus moderation outcomes. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice. 13(1). 16–16. 8 indexed citations

Hodgins, David C. & Jonathan N. Stea. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of a lifetime version of the marijuana problems scale. Addictive Behaviors Reports. 8. 21–24. 17 indexed citations

Hodgins, David C., Hyoun S. Kim, & Jonathan N. Stea. (2017). Increase and decrease of other substance use during recovery from cannabis use disorders.. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 31(6). 727–734. 10 indexed citations

Stea, Jonathan N., Igor Yakovenko, & David C. Hodgins. (2015). Recovery from cannabis use disorders: Abstinence versus moderation and treatment-assisted recovery versus natural recovery.. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 29(3). 522–531. 26 indexed citations

10.

Beshai, Shadi, et al.. (2015). Reduced Contact Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions for Adult Depression: A Review. The Journal of Psychology. 150(2). 252–279. 6 indexed citations

11.

Stea, Jonathan N., David C. Hodgins, & Tak Fung. (2014). Abstinence versus Moderation Goals in Brief Motivational Treatment for Pathological Gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies. 31(3). 1029–1045. 20 indexed citations

12.

Stea, Jonathan N., Sharon M. Lee, & Christopher R. Sears. (2013). Enhancement of False Memory for Negative Material in Dysphoria: Mood Congruency or Response Bias?. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 37(6). 1189–1200. 2 indexed citations

13.

Stea, Jonathan N. & David C. Hodgins. (2012). The relationship between lack of control and illusory pattern perception among at-risk gamblers and at-risk cannabis users. The Social Science Journal. 49(4). 528–536. 2 indexed citations

14.

Stea, Jonathan N. & David C. Hodgins. (2011). A Critical Review of Treatment Approaches for Gambling Disorders. Current Drug Abuse Reviews. 4(2). 67–80. 18 indexed citations

15.

Hodgins, David C., Jonathan N. Stea, & Jon E. Grant. (2011). Gambling disorders. The Lancet. 378(9806). 1874–1884. 312 indexed citations

16.

Stea, Jonathan N., David C. Hodgins, & Michael J. Lambert. (2011). Relations between delay discounting and low to moderate gambling, cannabis, and alcohol problems among university students. Behavioural Processes. 88(3). 202–205. 33 indexed citations

17.

Vettese, Lisa C., Tony Toneatto, Jonathan N. Stea, Linda Nguyen, & Jenny Jing Wang. (2009). Do Mindfulness Meditation Participants Do Their Homework? And Does It Make a Difference? A Review of the Empirical Evidence. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 23(3). 198–225. 164 indexed citations

18.

Stea, Jonathan N., et al.. (1993). Remedies for a society's debilities. Medicines for neurasthenia in Victorian America.. PubMed. 93(2). 120–7. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact