Jonathan Ho

1.2k total citations
11 papers, 384 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Ho is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Ho has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 384 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 2 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Ho's work include Electric Power System Optimization (7 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (6 papers) and Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (5 papers). Jonathan Ho is often cited by papers focused on Electric Power System Optimization (7 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (6 papers) and Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (5 papers). Jonathan Ho collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Chile. Jonathan Ho's co-authors include Benjamin F. Hobbs, Francisco D. Muñoz, James D. McCalley, Özge Özdemir, Venkat Krishnan, Qipeng P. Zheng, Mohammad Shahidehpour, Andrew L. Liu, Wesley Cole and Robert Margolis and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Energy, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems and iScience.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Ho

9 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Ho United States 7 330 51 42 41 40 11 384
Adelino J. C. Pereira Portugal 8 256 0.8× 33 0.6× 55 1.3× 37 0.9× 29 0.7× 28 299
Christoph Fraunholz Germany 9 275 0.8× 21 0.4× 61 1.5× 21 0.5× 50 1.3× 19 330
H.‐J. Haubrich Germany 8 323 1.0× 37 0.7× 49 1.2× 83 2.0× 40 1.0× 35 369
Ruth Domínguez Spain 11 412 1.2× 36 0.7× 107 2.5× 75 1.8× 20 0.5× 20 499
Bernardo Bezerra Chile 12 244 0.7× 24 0.5× 59 1.4× 29 0.7× 44 1.1× 25 346
Hanspeter Höschle Belgium 9 384 1.2× 17 0.3× 45 1.1× 60 1.5× 24 0.6× 16 415
Andrej F. Gubina Slovenia 12 408 1.2× 51 1.0× 89 2.1× 127 3.1× 34 0.8× 68 519
Laurens de Vries Netherlands 10 356 1.1× 18 0.4× 53 1.3× 78 1.9× 22 0.6× 24 386
Juan Rivier Abbad Spain 6 373 1.1× 64 1.3× 34 0.8× 98 2.4× 15 0.4× 7 402
Qingyu Xu United States 10 207 0.6× 29 0.6× 53 1.3× 32 0.8× 41 1.0× 28 314

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Ho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Ho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Ho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Ho. The network helps show where Jonathan Ho may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Ho

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Ho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Ho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Ho. Jonathan Ho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
3.
Cole, Wesley, Caitlin Murphy, Jonathan Ho, John Bistline, & Andrew Sowder. (2023). The potential role for new nuclear in the U.S. power system: A view from electricity system modelers. The Electricity Journal. 36(2-3). 107250–107250. 3 indexed citations
4.
Bistline, John, Shannon Bragg‐Sitton, Wesley Cole, et al.. (2023). Modeling nuclear energy’s future role in decarbonized energy systems. iScience. 26(2). 105952–105952. 15 indexed citations
5.
Cole, Wesley, Daniel Greer, Jonathan Ho, & Robert Margolis. (2020). Considerations for maintaining resource adequacy of electricity systems with high penetrations of PV and storage. Applied Energy. 279. 115795–115795. 31 indexed citations
6.
Ho, Jonathan, et al.. (2017). What are the Benefits of Co-Optimizing Transmission and Generation Investment? Eastern Interconnection Case Study. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 32(6). 4265–4277. 39 indexed citations
7.
Hobbs, Benjamin F., et al.. (2016). What is the Benefit of Including Uncertainty in Transmission Planning? A WECC Case Study. 2. 2364–2371. 2 indexed citations
8.
Hobbs, Benjamin F., et al.. (2016). Adaptive Transmission Planning: Implementing a New Paradigm for Managing Economic Risks in Grid Expansion. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine. 14(4). 30–40. 26 indexed citations
9.
Özdemir, Özge, Francisco D. Muñoz, Jonathan Ho, & Benjamin F. Hobbs. (2015). Economic Analysis of Transmission Expansion Planning With Price-Responsive Demand and Quadratic Losses by Successive LP. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 31(2). 1096–1107. 60 indexed citations
10.
Krishnan, Venkat, Jonathan Ho, Benjamin F. Hobbs, et al.. (2015). Co-optimization of electricity transmission and generation resources for planning and policy analysis: review of concepts and modeling approaches. Energy Systems. 7(2). 297–332. 100 indexed citations
11.
Muñoz, Francisco D., et al.. (2013). An Engineering-Economic Approach to Transmission Planning Under Market and Regulatory Uncertainties: WECC Case Study. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 29(1). 307–317. 108 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026