Jonathan Barrett

875 total citations
20 papers, 292 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Barrett is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Barrett has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 292 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 5 papers in Emergency Medicine and 4 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Barrett's work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers). Jonathan Barrett is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers). Jonathan Barrett collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Jonathan Barrett's co-authors include Alan Mendelowitz, Tomer T. Levin, Rinaldo Bellomo, Carol Hodgson, Belinda J. Gabbe, Paul S. Myles, Meredith Young, D. James Cooper, Michael Bailey and Alisa M. Higgins and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Critical Care Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Barrett

18 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Barrett Australia 7 146 59 53 52 51 20 292
Ingo Füsgen Germany 8 87 0.6× 27 0.5× 40 0.8× 59 1.1× 21 0.4× 35 319
Kellie Sosnowski Australia 8 172 1.2× 59 1.0× 46 0.9× 33 0.6× 14 0.3× 18 336
Craig Walker United Kingdom 8 149 1.0× 60 1.0× 62 1.2× 100 1.9× 37 0.7× 11 333
Ashley Montgomery-Yates United States 11 225 1.5× 76 1.3× 45 0.8× 55 1.1× 47 0.9× 20 385
Keibun Liu Japan 15 350 2.4× 159 2.7× 69 1.3× 54 1.0× 50 1.0× 61 579
Lisa Beach Australia 11 368 2.5× 90 1.5× 102 1.9× 30 0.6× 110 2.2× 23 571
Kate Fetterplace Australia 14 194 1.3× 20 0.3× 74 1.4× 14 0.3× 71 1.4× 39 579
Jeannette Hester United States 6 150 1.0× 50 0.8× 70 1.3× 111 2.1× 12 0.2× 11 334
M. van der Schaaf Netherlands 7 170 1.2× 78 1.3× 69 1.3× 24 0.5× 46 0.9× 11 335
Silvio Raspo Italy 6 94 0.6× 21 0.4× 52 1.0× 85 1.6× 89 1.7× 10 328

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Barrett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Barrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Barrett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Barrett. The network helps show where Jonathan Barrett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Barrett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Barrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Barrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Barrett. Jonathan Barrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barrett, Jonathan, et al.. (2024). Collision Avoidance Capabilities in High-Density Airspace Using the Universal Access Transceiver ADS-B Messages. Drones. 8(3). 86–86. 2 indexed citations
2.
Barrett, Jonathan, et al.. (2024). Factors influencing decision-making processes for intensive care therapy goals: A systematic integrative review. Australian Critical Care. 37(5). 805–817.
3.
Barrett, Jonathan, et al.. (2023). A Delphi study to obtain consensus on medical emergency team (MET) stand‐down decision making. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 32(21-22). 7873–7882.
4.
McKenzie, Dean, et al.. (2022). The adequacy of user seal checking for N95 respirators compared to formal fit testing: A multicentred observational study. Australian Critical Care. 36(5). 787–792. 3 indexed citations
5.
Higgins, Alisa M., Ary Serpa Neto, Michael Bailey, et al.. (2021). The psychometric properties and minimal clinically important difference for disability assessment using WHODAS 2.0 in critically ill patients. Critical Care and Resuscitation. 23(1). 103–112. 22 indexed citations
6.
Barrett, Jonathan, et al.. (2021). Modeling of Universal Access Transceiver ADS-B Performance Capabilities in High-Density Airspace. AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum. 1 indexed citations
7.
Higgins, Alisa M., Ary Serpa Neto, Michael Bailey, et al.. (2021). Predictors of death and new disability after critical illness: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Medicine. 47(7). 772–781. 28 indexed citations
8.
Barrett, Jonathan, et al.. (2021). Acute Management of Intraperitoneal Extravasation of Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) in a Very Preterm Infant: Case Report and Literature Review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. Volume 11. 77–81. 1 indexed citations
9.
10.
Barrett, Jonathan, et al.. (2020). ICU multidisciplinary team meetings improve communication, discipline profile and patient care. Australian Critical Care. 33. S38–S38. 1 indexed citations
11.
Calafiore, Paul, et al.. (2019). Validation of Epworth Richmond’s Echocardiography Education Focused Year. Critical Care Medicine. 48(1). e34–e39. 3 indexed citations
12.
Hodgson, Carol, Kimberley Haines, Michael Bailey, et al.. (2018). Predictors of return to work in survivors of critical illness. Journal of Critical Care. 48. 21–25. 25 indexed citations
13.
Hodgson, Carol, Andrew Udy, Michael Bailey, et al.. (2017). The impact of disability in survivors of critical illness. Intensive Care Medicine. 43(7). 992–1001. 102 indexed citations
14.
Polkinghorne, Kevan R., et al.. (2017). Early serum creatinine accurately predicts acute kidney injury post cardiac surgery. BMC Nephrology. 18(1). 93–93. 16 indexed citations
15.
Brewster, David, et al.. (2017). Evaluating Team-based Inter-professional Advanced Life Support Training in Intensive Care—a Prospective Observational Study. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 45(1). 79–87. 6 indexed citations
16.
Barrett, Jonathan, Gabrielle Hawdon, Julie H. Wade, & John H. Reeves. (2017). Measuring the success of Medical Emergency Teams: potentially preventable deaths versus total cardiac arrest deaths. A single centre observational study. Internal Medicine Journal. 48(3). 264–269. 11 indexed citations
17.
Levinson, Michele, et al.. (2016). ‘Why didn’t you write a not-for-cardiopulmonary resuscitation order?’ Unexpected death or failure of process?. Australian Health Review. 42(1). 53–58. 6 indexed citations
18.
Oldroyd, John, Michele Levinson, John H. Reeves, et al.. (2011). Cardiac Surgery in Octogenarians Results in Subjective Gains but No Objective Improvements in Quality of Life or Functional Status after three Months. Heart Lung and Circulation. 20. S224–S224. 2 indexed citations
19.
Levin, Tomer T., Jonathan Barrett, & Alan Mendelowitz. (2002). Death From Clozapine-Induced Constipation: Case Report and Literature Review. Psychosomatics. 43(1). 71–73. 52 indexed citations
20.
Barrett, Jonathan. (1993). Faecal incontinence and related problems in the older adult. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026