Jonas Tusch

439 total citations
22 papers, 320 citations indexed

About

Jonas Tusch is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonas Tusch has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 320 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Geophysics, 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Jonas Tusch's work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (21 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (8 papers). Jonas Tusch is often cited by papers focused on Geological and Geochemical Analysis (21 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (8 papers). Jonas Tusch collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Switzerland. Jonas Tusch's co-authors include Carsten Münker, J. Elis Hoffmann, Florian Kurzweil, Ronny Schoenberg, Kristoffer Szilas, Mario Fischer‐Gödde, P. Sprung, Austin Boyd, Minik T. Rosing and Hugh Smithies and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Jonas Tusch

21 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonas Tusch Germany 11 253 75 62 58 57 22 320
Catherine Zimmermann France 9 351 1.4× 149 2.0× 55 0.9× 51 0.9× 31 0.5× 10 408
Andrea Mundl‐Petermeier Austria 13 613 2.4× 72 1.0× 54 0.9× 91 1.6× 95 1.7× 20 688
Robert W. Nicklas United States 12 405 1.6× 89 1.2× 66 1.1× 103 1.8× 50 0.9× 29 506
J. C. Alt United States 7 369 1.5× 119 1.6× 102 1.6× 52 0.9× 65 1.1× 18 447
Nadja Drabon United States 13 267 1.1× 114 1.5× 100 1.6× 55 0.9× 85 1.5× 25 382
Chie Sakaguchi Japan 10 339 1.3× 76 1.0× 39 0.6× 101 1.7× 37 0.6× 18 447
Benjamin L. Byerly United States 12 369 1.5× 78 1.0× 36 0.6× 17 0.3× 32 0.6× 23 431
Delphine Auclair France 10 217 0.9× 39 0.5× 81 1.3× 24 0.4× 39 0.7× 14 299
Rita A. Cabral United States 4 349 1.4× 62 0.8× 53 0.9× 15 0.3× 40 0.7× 4 385
Janne Liebmann Australia 10 326 1.3× 145 1.9× 56 0.9× 13 0.2× 44 0.8× 25 361

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Tusch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Tusch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Tusch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Tusch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Tusch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Tusch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Tusch. The network helps show where Jonas Tusch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonas Tusch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonas Tusch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonas Tusch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonas Tusch. Jonas Tusch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tusch, Jonas, et al.. (2025). The spatio-temporal evolution of 182W and 142Nd in the Deccan-La Réunion plume. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 653. 119225–119225.
2.
Tusch, Jonas, et al.. (2024). Evidence for a missing late veneer from 182W and 142Nd systematics in the Archean São Francisco Craton. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 647. 119022–119022. 3 indexed citations
3.
Fischer‐Gödde, Mario, Jonas Tusch, Steven Goderis, et al.. (2024). Ruthenium isotopes show the Chicxulub impactor was a carbonaceous-type asteroid. Science. 385(6710). 752–756. 7 indexed citations
4.
Münker, Carsten, et al.. (2023). Cerium-Nd isotope evidence for an incompatible element depleted Moon. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 606. 118018–118018. 3 indexed citations
5.
7.
Duraiswami, Raymond A., et al.. (2023). Trace element and Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb isotope evidence for a multi-magma chamber system beneath the Deccan Volcanic Province, India. Chemical Geology. 640. 121749–121749. 6 indexed citations
8.
Tusch, Jonas, et al.. (2022). Upper mantle control on the W isotope record of shallow level plume and intraplate volcanic settings. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 585. 117507–117507. 11 indexed citations
9.
Tusch, Jonas, et al.. (2022). Long-term preservation of Hadean protocrust in Earth’s mantle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(18). e2120241119–e2120241119. 31 indexed citations
10.
Mundl‐Petermeier, Andrea, Sebastian Viehmann, Jonas Tusch, et al.. (2022). Earth’s geodynamic evolution constrained by 182W in Archean seawater. Nature Communications. 13(1). 2701–2701. 9 indexed citations
11.
Tusch, Jonas, Raúl O. C. Fonseca, Mario Fischer‐Gödde, et al.. (2021). Reply to: No 182W evidence for early Moon formation. Nature Geoscience. 14(10). 716–718. 11 indexed citations
12.
Schulz, Toni, Pavel P. Povinec, L. Ferrière, et al.. (2020). The history of the Tissint meteorite, from its crystallization on Mars to its exposure in space: New geochemical, isotopic, and cosmogenic nuclide data. Meteoritics and Planetary Science. 55(2). 294–311. 9 indexed citations
13.
Tusch, Jonas, Carsten Münker, Florian Kurzweil, et al.. (2020). Convective isolation of Hadean mantle reservoirs through Archean time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118(2). 34 indexed citations
14.
Kurzweil, Florian, Carsten Münker, J. Elis Hoffmann, Jonas Tusch, & Ronny Schoenberg. (2020). Stable W isotope evidence for redistribution of homogeneous 182W anomalies in SW Greenland. Geochemical Perspectives Letters. 14. 53–57. 12 indexed citations
15.
Waterton, Pedro, Jonas Tusch, Julie A. Hollis, et al.. (2020). Geodynamic Implications of Synchronous Norite and TTG Formation in the 3 Ga Maniitsoq Norite Belt, West Greenland. Frontiers in Earth Science. 8. 13 indexed citations
16.
Hoffmann, J. Elis, Alfred Kröner, Jean Wong, et al.. (2020). Hafnium-Neodymium isotope, trace element and U-Pb zircon age constraints on the petrogenesis of the 3.44–3.46 Ga Dwalile greenstone remnant, Ancient gneiss Complex, Swaziland. Precambrian Research. 351. 105970–105970. 6 indexed citations
17.
Tusch, Jonas, Martin J. Van Kranendonk, Hugh Smithies, et al.. (2020). Evolution of the early to late Archean mantle from Hf-Nd-Ce isotope systematics in basalts and komatiites from the Pilbara Craton. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 553. 116627–116627. 23 indexed citations
18.
Tusch, Jonas, P. Sprung, J. Elis Hoffmann, et al.. (2019). Uniform 182W isotope compositions in Eoarchean rocks from the Isua region, SW Greenland: The role of early silicate differentiation and missing late veneer. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 257. 284–310. 50 indexed citations
19.
Kurzweil, Florian, Carsten Münker, Jonas Tusch, & Ronny Schoenberg. (2017). Accurate stable tungsten isotope measurements of natural samples using a 180W-183W double-spike. Chemical Geology. 476. 407–417. 38 indexed citations
20.
Szilas, Kristoffer, Jonas Tusch, J. Elis Hoffmann, Adam A. Garde, & Carsten Münker. (2016). Hafnium isotope constraints on the origin of Mesoarchaean andesites in southern West Greenland, North Atlantic Craton. Geological Society London Special Publications. 449(1). 19–38. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026