Jon G. Dean

519 total citations
11 papers, 309 citations indexed

About

Jon G. Dean is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jon G. Dean has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jon G. Dean's work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Jon G. Dean is often cited by papers focused on Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Jon G. Dean collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Jon G. Dean's co-authors include Tiecheng Liu, George A. Mashour, Dinesh Pal, Duan Li, Anthony G. Hudetz, Christopher J.E. Watson, Michael M. Wang, Jimo Borjigin, Steven A. Barker and Rick J. Strassman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Jon G. Dean

11 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jon G. Dean United States 7 148 116 78 49 41 11 309
Mikael Tiger Sweden 13 116 0.8× 161 1.4× 61 0.8× 82 1.7× 12 0.3× 31 464
Janette McGaugh United States 6 154 1.0× 154 1.3× 30 0.4× 37 0.8× 21 0.5× 13 304
Corentin Rabu France 4 47 0.3× 93 0.8× 40 0.5× 47 1.0× 14 0.3× 4 356
Heather Pankow United States 2 46 0.3× 108 0.9× 44 0.6× 32 0.7× 11 0.3× 4 324
Alfred P. Kaye United States 7 129 0.9× 176 1.5× 115 1.5× 92 1.9× 6 0.1× 17 317
Dan Madularu Canada 13 117 0.8× 140 1.2× 13 0.2× 57 1.2× 9 0.2× 30 370
Arpan Dutta United Kingdom 6 299 2.0× 86 0.7× 36 0.5× 23 0.5× 10 0.2× 9 456
Jonathan Reinwald Germany 12 83 0.6× 78 0.7× 24 0.3× 38 0.8× 6 0.1× 20 262
G. Schönbeck Austria 9 25 0.2× 123 1.1× 75 1.0× 53 1.1× 24 0.6× 19 325
Donald R. Alms United States 6 31 0.2× 165 1.4× 49 0.6× 82 1.7× 18 0.4× 7 327

Countries citing papers authored by Jon G. Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon G. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon G. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon G. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon G. Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon G. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon G. Dean. The network helps show where Jon G. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jon G. Dean

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jon G. Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jon G. Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jon G. Dean. Jon G. Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Oliva, Valeria, Jon G. Dean, Carolina B. López, et al.. (2024). I feel your pain: higher empathy is associated with higher posterior default mode network activity. Pain. 166(4). e60–e67. 1 indexed citations
2.
Dean, Jon G., et al.. (2022). Inactivation of Prefrontal Cortex Attenuates Behavioral Arousal Induced by Stimulation of Basal Forebrain During Sevoflurane Anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 134(6). 1140–1152. 15 indexed citations
3.
Pal, Dinesh, et al.. (2021). Arousal Promoting Effects of Basal Forebrain are Mediated through Prefrontal Cortex in Rat. The FASEB Journal. 35(S1). 1 indexed citations
4.
Li, Duan, et al.. (2021). Cortical Acetylcholine Levels Correlate With Neurophysiologic Complexity During Subanesthetic Ketamine and Nitrous Oxide Exposure in Rats. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 134(6). 1126–1139. 5 indexed citations
5.
Dean, Jon G., Jason P. Chua, Rafael Wabl, et al.. (2020). Psychedelic‐assisted therapy for functional neurological disorders: A theoretical framework and review of prior reports. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives. 8(6). e00688–e00688. 9 indexed citations
6.
Pal, Dinesh, Duan Li, Jon G. Dean, et al.. (2019). Level of Consciousness Is Dissociable from Electroencephalographic Measures of Cortical Connectivity, Slow Oscillations, and Complexity. Journal of Neuroscience. 40(3). 605–618. 56 indexed citations
7.
Dean, Jon G., Tiecheng Liu, Steven A. Barker, et al.. (2019). Biosynthesis and Extracellular Concentrations of N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in Mammalian Brain. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 9333–9333. 67 indexed citations
8.
9.
Pal, Dinesh, Jon G. Dean, Tiecheng Liu, et al.. (2018). Differential Role of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices in Controlling Level of Consciousness. Current Biology. 28(13). 2145–2152.e5. 116 indexed citations
10.
Xu, Gang, et al.. (2018). Chronic circadian advance shifts abolish melatonin secretion for days in rats. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5. 78–83. 4 indexed citations
11.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026