Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-Industrial Development
1990328 citationsBernardo Sorj, John Wilkinson et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by John Wilkinson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John Wilkinson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wilkinson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wilkinson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wilkinson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wilkinson. The network helps show where John Wilkinson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Wilkinson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Wilkinson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Wilkinson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Wilkinson. John Wilkinson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wilkinson, John. (2013). Mercosul e produção familiar: abordagens teóricas e estratégias alternativas. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
3.
Wilkinson, John. (2013). Os gigantes da indústria alimentar entre a grande distribuição e os novos clusters a montante. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
4.
Wilkinson, John, et al.. (2013). Conhecimento tradicional, inovação e direitos de proteção. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
5.
Wilkinson, John. (2013). Mercosul e globalização: novos padrões de concorrência agroalimentar. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
6.
Wilkinson, John. (2013). A agricultura familiar ante o novo padrão de competitividade do sistema agroalimentar na América Latina. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
7.
Borras, Saturnino M., Cristóbal Kay, Georgina M. Gómez, & John Wilkinson. (2013). Acaparamiento de tierras y acumulación capitalista: aspectos clave en América Latina. RePub (Erasmus University, Rotterdam). 38. 75–103.6 indexed citations
Wilkinson, John, et al.. (2008). The institutionalization of Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) in Brazil: organic and fair trade initiatives.. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 368–371.16 indexed citations
Wilkinson, John. (1992). Hacia un sistema alimentario orientado por la demanda: nuevas direcciones para la innovación biotecnológica. Agricultura y sociedad. 99–126.
20.
Sorj, Bernardo, et al.. (1985). AS BIOTECNOLOGIAS NO BRASIL. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia. 2(1). 137–164.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.