John Watson

3.1k total citations
116 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

John Watson is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Media Technology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, John Watson has authored 116 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 32 papers in Media Technology and 25 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in John Watson's work include Digital Holography and Microscopy (45 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (21 papers) and Image Processing Techniques and Applications (16 papers). John Watson is often cited by papers focused on Digital Holography and Microscopy (45 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (21 papers) and Image Processing Techniques and Applications (16 papers). John Watson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. John Watson's co-authors include Philip Benzie, M.A. Player, Lukas Ahrenberg, Marcus Magnor, P. R. Hobson, J. Robert Martin, D. Hendry, Hongyue Sun, Claas Falldorf and Ulf Schnars and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Water Research and Limnology and Oceanography.

In The Last Decade

John Watson

110 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Watson United Kingdom 22 729 639 439 294 208 116 2.1k
Jian Sheng United States 27 839 1.2× 324 0.5× 206 0.5× 504 1.7× 75 0.4× 92 3.1k
Michael L. Eastwood United States 26 70 0.1× 1.1k 1.7× 254 0.6× 191 0.6× 35 0.2× 81 4.0k
Deric J. Gray United States 17 59 0.1× 125 0.2× 206 0.5× 639 2.2× 107 0.5× 42 1.1k
James H. Churnside United States 35 534 0.7× 38 0.1× 96 0.2× 1.0k 3.4× 164 0.8× 148 3.3k
Yun Jiang China 24 1.0k 1.4× 335 0.5× 190 0.4× 74 0.3× 87 0.4× 63 2.7k
Brian Cairns United States 43 176 0.2× 95 0.1× 30 0.1× 589 2.0× 51 0.2× 196 5.7k
Jing Cheng China 23 971 1.3× 529 0.8× 209 0.5× 25 0.1× 188 0.9× 95 2.2k
Robin M. Pope United States 5 88 0.1× 89 0.1× 38 0.1× 1.2k 4.2× 263 1.3× 6 2.0k
Andreas Jechow Germany 28 368 0.5× 42 0.1× 96 0.2× 77 0.3× 67 0.3× 77 3.1k
Alexander Kokhanovsky Germany 37 128 0.2× 69 0.1× 38 0.1× 218 0.7× 43 0.2× 276 5.7k

Countries citing papers authored by John Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Watson. The network helps show where John Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Watson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Watson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Watson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Watson. John Watson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Watson, John, et al.. (2024). No Mow May and Leave The Leaves: The impact of social campaigns on turf quality. International Turfgrass Society research journal. 15(1). 172–181. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gu, Zhaorui, Zhiqiang Hu, Guoyu Wang, et al.. (2023). Underwater computational imaging: a survey. 1(1). 2 indexed citations
4.
Liu, Zonghua, Tomoko Takahashi, Dhugal J. Lindsay, et al.. (2021). Digital In-Line Holography for Large-Volume Analysis of Vertical Motion of Microscale Marine Plankton and Other Particles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering. 46(4). 1248–1260. 9 indexed citations
5.
Liu, Zonghua, Thangavel Thevar, Tomoko Takahashi, et al.. (2021). Unsupervised feature learning and clustering of particles imaged in raw holograms using an autoencoder. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 38(10). 1570–1570. 3 indexed citations
6.
Watson, John. (2013). Book reviews. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 51(10). 1123–1123. 1 indexed citations
7.
Claus, Daniel, John Watson, & J. M. Rodenburg. (2011). Analysis and interpretation of the Seidel aberration coefficients in digital holography. Applied Optics. 50(34). H220–H220. 18 indexed citations
8.
Woodward, Ann, et al.. (2011). An Examination of Prehistoric Stone Bracers from Britain. Oxbow Books. 16 indexed citations
9.
Benzie, Philip, et al.. (2007). Developments for underwater remote vision. 2 indexed citations
10.
Perkins, Rupert, David M. Paterson, Hongyue Sun, John Watson, & M.A. Player. (2004). Extracellular polymeric substances: quantification and use in erosion experiments. Continental Shelf Research. 24(15). 1623–1635. 35 indexed citations
11.
Solan, Martin, Joseph D. Germano, Donald C. Rhoads, et al.. (2003). Towards a greater understanding of pattern, scale and process in marine benthic systems: a picture is worth a thousand worms. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 285-286. 313–338. 118 indexed citations
12.
Watson, John, Stefania Gentili, D. Hendry, et al.. (2003). A holographic system for subsea recording and analysis of plankton and other marine particles (HOLOMAR). Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492). 830–837 Vol.2. 8 indexed citations
13.
Hendry, D., P. R. Hobson, Richard S. Lampitt, et al.. (2000). HoloCam: a subsea holographic camera for recording marine organisms and particles. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London). 4076. 111–119. 2 indexed citations
14.
Player, M.A., et al.. (2000). <title>Influence of self-absorption on the performance of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4076. 260–268. 3 indexed citations
15.
Thevar, Thangavel & John Watson. (1996). <title>Longitudinal mode selection in a dye Q-switched ruby laser: a comparison between theoretical and experimental results</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2889. 60–69. 1 indexed citations
16.
Watson, John, et al.. (1995). <title>Holographic mensuration of suspended particles in aquatic systems</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2577. 191–199. 14 indexed citations
17.
Watson, John, et al.. (1992). Les darreres excavacions al Roc del Migdia (Vilanova de Sau, Osona): estat de la qüestió i noves perspectives. 15–24. 9 indexed citations
18.
Thevar, Thangavel, et al.. (1991). Design requirements of a pulsed ruby laser for an underwater holographic camera. 231–233. 1 indexed citations
19.
Watson, John, et al.. (1988). Underwater hologrammetry: aberrations in the real image of an underwater object when replayed in air. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics. 21(12). 1701–1705. 14 indexed citations
20.
Watson, John & J. W. Parsons. (1974). STUDIES OF SOIL ORGANO‐MINERAL FRACTIONS. Journal of Soil Science. 25(1). 1–8. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026