John W. Hawks

504 total citations
22 papers, 334 citations indexed

About

John W. Hawks is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Signal Processing. According to data from OpenAlex, John W. Hawks has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 334 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 8 papers in Signal Processing. Recurrent topics in John W. Hawks's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (12 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (8 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (8 papers). John W. Hawks is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (12 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (8 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (8 papers). John W. Hawks collaborates with scholars based in United States, Greece and China. John W. Hawks's co-authors include Marios Fourakis, James D. Miller, Jianxin Bao, Jennifer Liu, Colleen G. Le Prell, Timothy A. Holden, Laura K. Holden, Margaret W. Skinner, M. L. Hyde and George Kaprinis and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Hearing Research and Journal of Neuroscience Research.

In The Last Decade

John W. Hawks

21 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John W. Hawks United States 10 225 152 108 101 94 22 334
Gregory P. Widin United States 6 380 1.7× 166 1.1× 122 1.1× 201 2.0× 167 1.8× 13 501
Benjamin Sheffield United States 11 288 1.3× 138 0.9× 164 1.5× 76 0.8× 58 0.6× 29 335
Jae Hee Lee United States 5 298 1.3× 58 0.4× 136 1.3× 154 1.5× 142 1.5× 7 351
Jungmee Lee United States 12 347 1.5× 271 1.8× 200 1.9× 48 0.5× 59 0.6× 45 469
Anita Wagner Netherlands 11 297 1.3× 56 0.4× 140 1.3× 148 1.5× 114 1.2× 22 357
David C. Bennett United States 7 50 0.2× 67 0.4× 35 0.3× 103 1.0× 17 0.2× 15 260
John C. G. M. van Rooij Netherlands 6 357 1.6× 124 0.8× 255 2.4× 82 0.8× 114 1.2× 9 405
J. Verschuure Netherlands 12 265 1.2× 166 1.1× 155 1.4× 47 0.5× 112 1.2× 20 381
Drew Jordan McLaughlin United States 8 174 0.8× 20 0.1× 61 0.6× 150 1.5× 62 0.7× 18 252
Matthew B. Winn United States 11 391 1.7× 68 0.4× 129 1.2× 265 2.6× 203 2.2× 19 496

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Hawks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Hawks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Hawks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Hawks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Hawks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Hawks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Hawks. The network helps show where John W. Hawks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Hawks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Hawks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Hawks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Hawks. John W. Hawks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bao, Jianxin, et al.. (2022). Detecting Cochlear Synaptopathy Through Curvature Quantification of the Auditory Brainstem Response. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 16. 851500–851500. 7 indexed citations
2.
Bao, Jianxin, Yan Yu, Hui Li, et al.. (2020). Evidence for independent peripheral and central age‐related hearing impairment. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 98(9). 1800–1814. 10 indexed citations
3.
Prell, Colleen G. Le, et al.. (2016). Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy: Past findings and future studies. Hearing Research. 349. 148–154. 98 indexed citations
4.
Lotto, Andrew J., et al.. (2008). Perceptual context effects of speech and nonspeech sounds: The role of auditory categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 124(3). 1695–1703. 11 indexed citations
5.
Fourakis, Marios, John W. Hawks, Laura K. Holden, Margaret W. Skinner, & Timothy A. Holden. (2007). Effect of Frequency Boundary Assignment on Speech Recognition with the Nucleus 24 ACE Speech Coding Strategy. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 18(8). 700–717. 15 indexed citations
6.
Hawks, John W., et al.. (2007). Evaluation of the consonant-nucleus-consonant word test as spoken by a female talker. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 122(5_Supplement). 3065–3065. 1 indexed citations
7.
Skinner, Margaret W., Laura K. Holden, Marios Fourakis, et al.. (2006). Evaluation of Equivalency in Two Recordings of Monosyllabic Words. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 17(5). 350–366. 33 indexed citations
8.
Iliadou, Vasiliki, et al.. (2005). Bi-syllabic, Modern Greek word lists for use in word recognition tests. International Journal of Audiology. 45(2). 74–82. 24 indexed citations
9.
Fourakis, Marios, John W. Hawks, Laura K. Holden, Margaret W. Skinner, & Timothy A. Holden. (2004). Effect of Frequency Boundary Assignment on Vowel Recognition with the Nucleus 24 ACE Speech Coding Strategy. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 15(4). 281–299. 12 indexed citations
10.
Krishnamurti, Sridhar, et al.. (1999). Performance of Preschool Children on Two Hearing Screening Protocols. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders. 26(Spring). 63–68. 3 indexed citations
11.
Hawks, John W.. (1998). Sound Levels Emitted by Children's Toys. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders. 25(Spring). 41–44. 1 indexed citations
12.
Hawks, John W. & Marios Fourakis. (1998). Perception of synthetic vowels by cochlear implant recipients. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 104(3_Supplement). 1854–1855. 1 indexed citations
13.
Hawks, John W., Marios Fourakis, Margaret W. Skinner, Timothy A. Holden, & Laura K. Holden. (1997). Effects of Formant Bandwidth on the Identification of Synthetic Vowels by Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear and Hearing. 18(6). 479–487. 11 indexed citations
14.
Botinis, Antonis, Marios Fourakis, & John W. Hawks. (1997). A perceptual study of the greek vowel space using synthetic stimuli. 1307–1310. 4 indexed citations
15.
Hawks, John W. & James D. Miller. (1995). A formant bandwidth estimation procedure for vowel synthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 97(2). 1343–1344. 47 indexed citations
16.
Hawks, John W., et al.. (1995). An investigation of the perceptual magnet effect in adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 97(5_Supplement). 3420–3420. 3 indexed citations
17.
Hawks, John W.. (1994). Difference limens for formant patterns of vowel sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 95(2). 1074–1084. 40 indexed citations
18.
Hawks, John W.. (1990). Perceptual aspects of a three-dimensional vowel space. Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine). 2 indexed citations
19.
Fourakis, Marios & John W. Hawks. (1990). On the perceptual vowel space of Modern Greek. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 87(S1). S160–S160. 1 indexed citations
20.
Miller, James D. & John W. Hawks. (1989). Target zones for synthetic vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 85(S1). S51–S51. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026