John W. Counts

553 citations
25 papers · 413 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Counts

23 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

John W. Counts
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Earth-Surface Processes 240
  • Geology 114
  • Paleontology 138
  • Atmospheric Science 233
  • Geophysics 108
Replace James Browning with:
James Browning
Pontus Lurcock Italy
E. Browning United States
A J Powell United Kingdom
Elisa Villa Spain
Pierrick Rouillard New Caledonia
В.И. Полетаев Ukraine
J. Fürstenau Germany
Stanisław Leszczyński Poland
Claude Colombié France
John W. Counts relative to James Browning James Browning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
James Browning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Counts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Counts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Counts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Counts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Counts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Counts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Counts. The network helps show where John W. Counts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Counts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Counts Line = papers co-authored together John W. Counts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202162
2 200960
3 202047
4 201837
5 202030
6 200524
7 202017
8 201816
9 201616
10 202016
11 201915
12 201012
13 201510
14 20149
15 20218
16 20198
17 20217
18 20236
19 20164
20 20213

About John W. Counts

John W. Counts is a scholar working on Earth-Surface Processes, Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, Geology and Geophysics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological formations and processes (16 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (14 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (11 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (8 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (4 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (4 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (3 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (240 citations), Geology (114 citations), Paleontology (138 citations), Atmospheric Science (233 citations) and Geophysics (108 citations). John W. Counts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and France. Frequent co-authors include Stephen T. Hasiotis, Stéphan Jorry, Gwénaël Jouet, Elda Miramontes, Kathryn Amos, Estelle Leroux, Charles E. Savrda, Simon Courgeon, Natalia Vázquez Riveiros and François Raisson. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Geology, Journal of Sedimentary Research, Palaios, Sedimentology and Facies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact