John W. Cain

757 citations
31 papers · 509 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Cain

27 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

John W. Cain
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 198
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 119
  • Pharmacology 94
  • Biological Psychiatry 13
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 67
Replace Hang Su with:
Hang Su China
Klaudius Kalcher Austria
M. Kimura Japan
James Currie United Kingdom
Sean O’Connor United States
Zhenxiang Zang Germany
Obada Al Zoubi United States
Shao‐Wei Xue China
Shuzhe Zhou China
Christine M. Embury United States
John W. Cain relative to Hang Su China Hang Su's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Hang Su · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Cain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Cain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Cain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Cain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Cain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Cain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Cain. The network helps show where John W. Cain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Cain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Cain Line = papers co-authored together John W. Cain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997122
2 199488
3 199445
4
Poor response to fluoxetine: underlying depression, serotonergic overstimulation, or a "therapeutic window"?
199239
5 201630
6 202028
7 200928
8 200718
9 202015
10 200415
11 198614
12 200811
13 20079
14 20069
15 20088
16 19945
17 20204
18 20074
19
Taking Math to Heart: Mathematical Challenges in Cardiac Electrophysiology
20113
20 20243

About John W. Cain

John W. Cain is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 31 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (4 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (198 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (119 citations), Pharmacology (94 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (67 citations). John W. Cain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include David G. Schaeffer, Howard P. Roffwarg, A. John Rush, Roseanne Armitage, Madhukar H. Trivedi, Daniel J. Gauthier, Judith M. Siegel, R. Bruce Lydiard, Jonathan Davidson and M R Liebowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal of Mathematical Biology, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution and SIAM Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact