Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Countries citing papers authored by John Vandermeer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John Vandermeer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Vandermeer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Vandermeer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Vandermeer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Vandermeer. The network helps show where John Vandermeer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Vandermeer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Vandermeer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Vandermeer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Vandermeer. John Vandermeer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vandermeer, John, et al.. (2014). La recuperación del bosque continúa en la RAAS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 38–46.
7.
Page, Scott E. & John Vandermeer. (2013). Inequality and innovativeness. Economics bulletin. 33(1). 1–59.1 indexed citations
8.
Scheffer, Marten, Stephen R. Carpenter, Timothy M. Lenton, et al.. (2012). Anticipating Critical Transitions. Science. 338(6105). 344–348.1433 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Perfecto, Ivette & John Vandermeer. (2012). Separation or integration of biodiversity conservation: the ideology behind the "land-sharing" versus "land-sparing" debate.. Ecosistemas. 21. 180–191.10 indexed citations
10.
Perfecto, Ivette & John Vandermeer. (2012). Separación o integración para la conservación de biodiversidad: la ideología detrás del debate "land- sharing" frente a "land-sparing". SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 21. 180–191.18 indexed citations
11.
Jha, Shalene, John Vandermeer, & Ivette Perfecto. (2009). Population dynamics of Coccus viridis, a ubiquitous ant-tended agricultural pest, assessed by a new photographic method. Bulletin of insectology. 62(2). 183–189.5 indexed citations
Vandermeer, John. (1990). Crecimiento y supervivencia de plántulas de Welfia georgii en un bosque pluvial en la costa caribeña de Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical. 38(1). 7–20.2 indexed citations
19.
Levins, Richard, John Vandermeer, C. Ronald Carroll, & Peter Rosset. (1990). The agroecosystem embedded in a complex ecological community.. 29(2). 341–362.13 indexed citations
20.
Vandermeer, John. (1983). Una teoria de siembra intercalada en plantaciones jovenes. 117–123.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.