John Uecker

479 total citations
24 papers, 331 citations indexed

About

John Uecker is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, John Uecker has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 331 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in John Uecker's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (12 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers). John Uecker is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (12 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers). John Uecker collaborates with scholars based in United States and Portugal. John Uecker's co-authors include Carlos Brown, Ernest Dunn, Sádia Ali, Harold R. Bohman, Lowell W. Chambers, Peter Rhee, Bruce L. Gillingham, Michael S. Truitt, Brian J. Dunkin and Kimberly M. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons and Surgical Endoscopy.

In The Last Decade

John Uecker

21 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Uecker United States 10 242 149 104 52 39 24 331
Frank Chu United States 10 183 0.8× 105 0.7× 72 0.7× 45 0.9× 15 0.4× 22 309
Daniel J. Kacey United States 8 238 1.0× 94 0.6× 48 0.5× 39 0.8× 17 0.4× 14 329
Robert A. Zeldin Canada 5 155 0.6× 231 1.6× 31 0.3× 85 1.6× 38 1.0× 12 361
Gordon Buduhan Canada 9 185 0.8× 145 1.0× 113 1.1× 23 0.4× 8 0.2× 28 407
Steven M. Yood United States 7 252 1.0× 153 1.0× 44 0.4× 94 1.8× 40 1.0× 12 368
Amita A. Desai United States 12 227 0.9× 58 0.4× 95 0.9× 29 0.6× 24 0.6× 23 314
Rafe C. Connors United States 9 220 0.9× 113 0.8× 63 0.6× 12 0.2× 72 1.8× 12 415
Lisandro Montorfano United States 10 217 0.9× 94 0.6× 18 0.2× 42 0.8× 44 1.1× 65 325
Verena N. N. Kornmann Netherlands 13 368 1.5× 240 1.6× 122 1.2× 211 4.1× 92 2.4× 17 518
Hye-Young Choi South Korea 13 122 0.5× 56 0.4× 121 1.2× 23 0.4× 13 0.3× 28 330

Countries citing papers authored by John Uecker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Uecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Uecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Uecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Uecker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Uecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Uecker. The network helps show where John Uecker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Uecker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Uecker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Uecker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Uecker. John Uecker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Srinivasan, Malathi, et al.. (2025). Blurred vision, clear concern: linking poor visualization with adverse events in minimally invasive surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 39(9). 5577–5585.
2.
Dhingra, Jagdish K., et al.. (2025). Clear Vision, Clear Savings: Enhancing Efficiency in Minimally Invasive Surgery. JSLS Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 29(3). e2025.00023–e2025.00023.
3.
Uecker, John, et al.. (2023). Adrenal Ganglioneuroma: Diagnosis, Presentation, and Management of a Rare Tumor. Cureus. 15(6). e39977–e39977. 2 indexed citations
4.
Parker, Morgan E., John Uecker, Aaron A. Laviana, et al.. (2023). Impaired robotic surgical visualization: archaic issues in a modern operating room. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 17(6). 2875–2880. 1 indexed citations
5.
Hill, Charles E., et al.. (2022). A Clean Sweep: Initial Experience with a Novel Intracavity Laparoscopic Cleaning Device. JSLS Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 26(4). e2022.00066–e2022.00066. 2 indexed citations
6.
Uecker, John, et al.. (2022). Assessing visualization in robotic-assisted surgery: demystifying a misty lens. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 17(3). 915–922. 2 indexed citations
7.
Idelson, Christopher R., et al.. (2021). Design and Performance Testing of a Novel In Vivo Laparoscope Lens Cleaning Device. Journal of Medical Devices. 15(3). 2 indexed citations
8.
Uecker, John, et al.. (2020). Stop the leak!: Mitigating potential exposure of aerosolized COVID-19 during laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 35(1). 493–501. 9 indexed citations
9.
Bankhead-Kendall, Brittany, et al.. (2019). Case logging habits among general surgery residents are discordant and inconsistent. The American Journal of Surgery. 219(6). 937–942. 8 indexed citations
10.
Miller, Andrew L., et al.. (2019). Combining Instructional Videos with Cadaver Training for General Surgery Residents. The American Surgeon. 85(4). 230–232. 1 indexed citations
11.
Gardner, Aimee K., Daniel J. Scott, Ross E. Willis, et al.. (2016). Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?. Surgical Endoscopy. 31(1). 352–358. 33 indexed citations
12.
Uecker, John, et al.. (2016). Restrictive Transfusion in Geriatric Trauma Patients. The American Surgeon. 82(1). 85–88. 4 indexed citations
13.
Gardner, Aimee K., Ross E. Willis, Brian J. Dunkin, et al.. (2015). What do residents need to be competent laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeons?. Surgical Endoscopy. 30(7). 3050–3059. 19 indexed citations
14.
Aydelotte, Jayson, Jawad Ali, Phuong Tu Huynh, et al.. (2015). Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 221(1). 215–219. 26 indexed citations
15.
Willis, Ross E., Daniel L. Dent, Joseph D. Love, et al.. (2015). Predicting and enhancing American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination performance: does writing questions really help?. The American Journal of Surgery. 211(2). 361–368. 6 indexed citations
16.
Uecker, John, et al.. (2013). Comparable Operative Times With and Without Surgery Resident Participation. Journal of surgical education. 70(6). 696–699. 39 indexed citations
17.
Uecker, John, et al.. (2011). Intraoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer Specimens Decreases Cost and Number of Reoperations. The American Surgeon. 77(3). 342–344. 14 indexed citations
18.
Chambers, Lowell W., Bruce L. Gillingham, Peter Rhee, et al.. (2006). Tactical Surgical Intervention With Temporary Shunting of Peripheral Vascular Trauma Sustained During Operation Iraqi Freedom: One Unit??s Experience. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 61(4). 824–830. 72 indexed citations
19.
Uecker, John, et al.. (2002). Are we meeting the needs of our surgical graduates. Current Surgery. 59(3). 324–327. 1 indexed citations
20.
Uecker, John, et al.. (2001). The Role of Follow-up Radiographic Studies in Nonoperative Management of Spleen Trauma. The American Surgeon. 67(1). 22–25. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026