John Tyndall

2.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
77 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

John Tyndall is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Tyndall has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 16 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 13 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in John Tyndall's work include Forest Management and Policy (14 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (13 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (12 papers). John Tyndall is often cited by papers focused on Forest Management and Policy (14 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (13 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (12 papers). John Tyndall collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Denmark. John Tyndall's co-authors include J. Gordon Arbuckle, Gabrielle Roesch‐McNally, Lisa A. Schulte, Joe P. Colletti, Matthew J. Helmers, Linda S. Prokopy, Troy Bowman, Lois Wright Morton, Jon Hobbs and Laura E. Christianson and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Water Resources Research and Journal of Hydrology.

In The Last Decade

John Tyndall

73 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of m... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 2017 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Tyndall United States 22 476 473 441 387 378 77 2.2k
S. Vermeulen Belgium 16 721 1.5× 545 1.2× 513 1.2× 480 1.2× 423 1.1× 28 2.5k
Benjamin M. Gramig United States 17 449 0.9× 339 0.7× 322 0.7× 269 0.7× 223 0.6× 58 1.5k
Jan Philipp Dietrich Germany 28 265 0.6× 722 1.5× 525 1.2× 372 1.0× 430 1.1× 63 3.0k
Stanley Wood United States 19 638 1.3× 631 1.3× 852 1.9× 661 1.7× 580 1.5× 37 2.7k
Dana L. Hoag United States 27 376 0.8× 436 0.9× 181 0.4× 197 0.5× 316 0.8× 102 1.9k
Kristin Floress United States 19 1.2k 2.4× 740 1.6× 280 0.6× 595 1.5× 291 0.8× 53 2.8k
Katharina Waha Australia 23 461 1.0× 932 2.0× 968 2.2× 773 2.0× 544 1.4× 39 3.2k
N. Hatibu Tanzania 16 353 0.7× 549 1.2× 461 1.0× 479 1.2× 614 1.6× 36 2.1k
Nicholas R. Jordan United States 22 301 0.6× 289 0.6× 301 0.7× 591 1.5× 368 1.0× 56 1.8k
Tiziano Gomiero Italy 21 406 0.9× 251 0.5× 202 0.5× 783 2.0× 440 1.2× 29 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by John Tyndall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Tyndall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Tyndall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Tyndall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Tyndall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Tyndall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Tyndall. The network helps show where John Tyndall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Tyndall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Tyndall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Tyndall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Tyndall. John Tyndall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhang, Ge, et al.. (2025). Support for Agricultural Prairie Strips as Monarch Butterfly Habitat. Ecological Restoration. 43(2). 88–93.
2.
Rehmann, Chris R., et al.. (2024). Mapping barriers to food, energy, and water systems equity in the United States. Environmental Science & Policy. 162. 103941–103941. 1 indexed citations
3.
Stephenson, James A., Matt Liebman, Jarad Niemi, et al.. (2024). The influence of prairie strips sown in midwestern corn and soybean fields on sediment discharge throughout the year. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 79(2). 87–98. 1 indexed citations
4.
Tyndall, John, et al.. (2021). Financial Analysis of Converting Rural Lawns to Pollinator Habitat in the Corn Belt. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 12(1). 151–162. 2 indexed citations
5.
Tyndall, John. (2021). Prairie and tree planting tool—PT2 (1.0): a conservation decision support tool for Iowa, USA. Agroforestry Systems. 96(1). 49–64. 5 indexed citations
6.
Niemi, Jarad, et al.. (2020). Developing a decision‐making framework for insect pest management: a case study using Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Pest Management Science. 77(2). 886–894. 14 indexed citations
8.
Tyndall, John, et al.. (2018). VEB-Econ: A Vegetative Environmental Buffer Decision-Support Tool for Environmental Quality Management. Journal of Forestry. 116(6). 573–580. 2 indexed citations
9.
Schulte, Lisa A., et al.. (2017). Public–Private Partnerships Working Beyond Scale Challenges toward Water Quality Improvements from Private Lands. Environmental Management. 60(4). 574–587. 16 indexed citations
10.
Schulte, Lisa A., Jarad Niemi, Matthew J. Helmers, et al.. (2017). Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from corn–soybean croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(42). 11247–11252. 253 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Schulte, Lisa A., et al.. (2015). How Should Iowa’s Agricultural Landscape Look?. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1 indexed citations
12.
Tyndall, John, et al.. (2015). New Atlas Features Corn Belt Farmers' Perspectives on Agriculture and Climate. Journal of Extension. 53(1). 9 indexed citations
13.
14.
Prokopy, Linda S., J. Gordon Arbuckle, Andrew Barnes, et al.. (2015). Farmers and Climate Change: A Cross-National Comparison of Beliefs and Risk Perceptions in High-Income Countries. Environmental Management. 56(2). 492–504. 95 indexed citations
15.
Tyndall, John, et al.. (2014). Agricultural Water Quality BMPs: A Standardized Approach to Financial Analysis. Journal of Extension. 52(3). 20 indexed citations
16.
Christianson, Laura E., et al.. (2013). Adoption potential of nitrate mitigation practices: an ecosystem services approach. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 12(4). 407–424. 20 indexed citations
17.
Tyndall, John, Lisa A. Schulte, Matt Liebman, & Matthew J. Helmers. (2013). Field-Level Financial Assessment of Contour Prairie Strips for Enhancement of Environmental Quality. Environmental Management. 52(3). 736–747. 31 indexed citations
18.
Tyndall, John, et al.. (2012). Social Approval of the Community Assessment Model for Odor Dispersal: Results from a Citizen Survey. Environmental Management. 50(2). 315–328. 2 indexed citations
19.
Bowman, Troy, John Tyndall, Janette R. Thompson, James Kliebenstein, & Joe P. Colletti. (2012). Multiple approaches to valuation of conservation design and low-impact development features in residential subdivisions. Journal of Environmental Management. 104. 101–113. 30 indexed citations
20.
Tyndall, John, et al.. (2011). Windbreaks: A "Fresh" Tool to Mitigate Odors from Livestock Production Facilities. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026