John T. Pohlmann
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Philip A. RobertsonJames S. FralishScott B. FranklinDavid J. GibsonPatricia B. ElmoreLawrence H. PetersSusan M. TraczDavid F. Lohman
- Topics
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices (6 papers)Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers)Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological BulletinSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John T. Pohlmann
19 papers receiving 738 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Education 252
- Social Psychology 163
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 89
- Sociology and Political Science 80
Countries citing papers authored by John T. Pohlmann
This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Pohlmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Pohlmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Pohlmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Pohlmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Pohlmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Pohlmann. The network helps show where John T. Pohlmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John T. Pohlmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John T. Pohlmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John T. Pohlmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John T. Pohlmann. John T. Pohlmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 108 | |
| 3 | Permutation Tests in Principal Component Analysis. | 1 |
| 4 | 307 | |
| 5 | Insidious Structural Errors in Latent Variable Models. | 1 |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 105 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | Controlling the Type I Error Rate in Stepwise Regression Analysis. | 1 |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | An Automated Instructor Evaluation System. | 1 |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 65 |
About John T. Pohlmann
John T. Pohlmann is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 23 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (6 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (252 citations), Social Psychology (163 citations) and Applied Psychology (38 citations). John T. Pohlmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip A. Robertson, James S. Fralish, Scott B. Franklin, David J. Gibson, Patricia B. Elmore, Lawrence H. Peters, Susan M. Tracz, David F. Lohman, Kyle Perkins and Michael J. Kolen. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.