John Stark

1.7k total citations
79 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

John Stark is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Spectroscopy and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John Stark has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 33 papers in Spectroscopy and 33 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in John Stark's work include Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (45 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (32 papers) and Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (23 papers). John Stark is often cited by papers focused on Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (45 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (32 papers) and Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (23 papers). John Stark collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. John Stark's co-authors include Stephen P. Massia, Katherine Smith, Matthew S. Alexander, Mark D. Paine, Herbert Shea, Ke Wang, Iain D. Boyd, Jianping Wu, Ke Wang and Robert S. Stevens and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

John Stark

74 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Stark United Kingdom 20 812 533 409 220 165 79 1.3k
Chia‐Wen Tsao Taiwan 20 630 0.8× 1.7k 3.2× 206 0.5× 91 0.4× 135 0.8× 72 2.3k
Franck Clément France 22 809 1.0× 131 0.2× 102 0.2× 42 0.2× 54 0.3× 63 1.4k
Giuseppe Firpo Italy 18 232 0.3× 640 1.2× 124 0.3× 84 0.4× 160 1.0× 66 1.1k
Paolo Bettotti Italy 23 780 1.0× 553 1.0× 40 0.1× 174 0.8× 40 0.2× 96 1.8k
Helene Andersson Sweden 26 632 0.8× 1.8k 3.4× 51 0.1× 112 0.5× 54 0.3× 52 2.5k
Wenbin Huang China 20 454 0.6× 369 0.7× 27 0.1× 53 0.2× 81 0.5× 88 1.3k
Wei Xue China 23 288 0.4× 391 0.7× 65 0.2× 209 0.9× 11 0.1× 62 1.5k
Gustavo F. Trindade United Kingdom 19 207 0.3× 282 0.5× 80 0.2× 34 0.2× 160 1.0× 62 900
Nikin Patel United Kingdom 16 262 0.3× 410 0.8× 90 0.2× 136 0.6× 92 0.6× 20 1.1k
Guojun Liu China 19 217 0.3× 494 0.9× 53 0.1× 306 1.4× 33 0.2× 77 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by John Stark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stark. The network helps show where John Stark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Stark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Stark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Stark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Stark. John Stark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stark, John, et al.. (2024). Study of field ion emission from ionic liquids using molecular dynamics simulations. Physics of Fluids. 36(1). 3 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Katherine, et al.. (2014). The flow rate sensitivity to voltage across four electrospray modes. Applied Physics Letters. 104(8). 22 indexed citations
3.
Ataman, Ç‪ağlar, et al.. (2013). Design and fabrication of the thruster heads for the MicroThrust MEMS electrospray propulsion system. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 6 indexed citations
4.
Stark, John, et al.. (2013). Experimental progress towards the MicroThrust MEMS electrospray electric propulsion system. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 6 indexed citations
5.
Ataman, Ç‪ağlar, et al.. (2011). Microfabrication of Capillary Electrospray Emitters and ToF Characterization of the Emitted Beam. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 5 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Ke & John Stark. (2010). Voltage effects on the nanoelectrospray characteristics in fully voltage-controlled atomisation of gold nanocolloids. Analytica Chimica Acta. 679(1-2). 81–84. 18 indexed citations
7.
Heywood, Hannah K., Peter Rockett, Mark D. Paine, et al.. (2010). Electrospray deposited fibronectin retains the ability to promote cell adhesion. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials. 96B(1). 110–118. 5 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Katherine, et al.. (2009). Performance modulation of colloid thrusters by the variation of flow rate with applied voltage.. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations
9.
Shea, Herbert, et al.. (2007). Design and fabrication of an integrated MEMS-based colloid micropropulsion system. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 11 indexed citations
10.
Alexander, Matthew S., Katherine Smith, Mark D. Paine, & John Stark. (2007). Voltage-Modulated Flow Rate for Precise Thrust Control in Colloid Electrospray Propulsion. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 23(5). 1042–1048. 15 indexed citations
11.
Paine, Mark D., Matthew S. Alexander, & John Stark. (2006). Nozzle and liquid effects on the spray modes in nanoelectrospray. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 305(1). 111–123. 37 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Katherine, Matthew S. Alexander, & John Stark. (2006). The role of molar conductivity in electrospray cone-jet mode current scaling. Journal of Applied Physics. 100(1). 6 indexed citations
13.
Wu, Jianping & John Stark. (2006). Measurement of low frequency relative permittivity of room temperature molten salts by triangular waveform voltage. Measurement Science and Technology. 17(4). 781–788. 23 indexed citations
14.
Alexander, Matthew S., Mark D. Paine, & John Stark. (2006). Pulsation Modes and the Effect of Applied Voltage on Current and Flow Rate in Nanoelectrospray. Analytical Chemistry. 78(8). 2658–2664. 53 indexed citations
15.
Stark, John, B. J. Kent, Robert S. Stevens, et al.. (2003). Colloid Propulsion - A Re-evaluatiom with an Integrated Design. 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. 7 indexed citations
16.
Massia, Stephen P. & John Stark. (2001). Immobilized RGD peptides on surface-grafted dextran promote biospecific cell attachment. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 56(3). 390–399. 157 indexed citations
17.
Massia, Stephen P., et al.. (2000). Surface-immobilized dextran limits cell adhesion and spreading. Biomaterials. 21(22). 2253–2261. 192 indexed citations
18.
Stark, John, et al.. (1991). Luminescence near surfaces in energetic rarefied flows. 1506–1513. 1 indexed citations
19.
Crowther, R.L. & John Stark. (1991). The determination of the gas-surface interaction from satellite orbit analysis as applied to ANS-1 (1975-70A). Planetary and Space Science. 39(5). 729–736. 5 indexed citations
20.
Fox, T. A. & John Stark. (1989). Characteristics of Miniature Short-Tube Orifice Flows. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 203(5). 351–358. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026