John Sitzia

4.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
40 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

John Sitzia is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, John Sitzia has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in General Health Professions, 14 papers in Oncology and 10 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in John Sitzia's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (9 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 papers). John Sitzia is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (9 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 papers). John Sitzia collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and India. John Sitzia's co-authors include Neil Wood, Nicole Wood, Wendy Harlow, Brandon Clark, Alison Richardson, Francisco J. Medina, A.W.B. Stanton, Phil Cotterell, Peter Beresford and Fiona Ross and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

John Sitzia

39 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

Patient satisfaction: A review of issues and concepts 1997 2026 2006 2016 1997 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Sitzia United Kingdom 24 2.1k 1.0k 557 547 458 40 3.7k
Karen Sepucha United States 37 3.1k 1.5× 933 0.9× 586 1.1× 1.4k 2.6× 234 0.5× 153 4.7k
Jeanette Ward Australia 35 1.9k 0.9× 880 0.8× 353 0.6× 1.3k 2.3× 148 0.3× 188 4.8k
Gwenn Menvielle France 38 3.2k 1.5× 931 0.9× 203 0.4× 970 1.8× 320 0.7× 155 6.5k
Sarah M. Greene United States 35 2.1k 1.0× 702 0.7× 250 0.4× 1.0k 1.8× 163 0.4× 87 4.6k
Anne Lyddiatt Canada 21 4.2k 2.0× 661 0.6× 370 0.7× 2.1k 3.8× 362 0.8× 40 6.5k
Arwen H. Pieterse Netherlands 34 2.4k 1.1× 534 0.5× 216 0.4× 1.4k 2.5× 162 0.4× 108 3.7k
Marilyn M. Schapira United States 35 1.4k 0.7× 1.2k 1.1× 280 0.5× 589 1.1× 101 0.2× 157 3.7k
Mary C. Politi United States 33 2.6k 1.2× 486 0.5× 247 0.4× 1.5k 2.8× 194 0.4× 146 4.6k
Melissa R. Partin United States 30 1.4k 0.7× 1.1k 1.1× 228 0.4× 557 1.0× 87 0.2× 77 3.4k
Krystina B. Lewis Canada 18 2.7k 1.3× 453 0.4× 245 0.4× 1.6k 2.8× 183 0.4× 62 4.4k

Countries citing papers authored by John Sitzia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Sitzia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Sitzia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Sitzia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Sitzia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Sitzia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Sitzia. The network helps show where John Sitzia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Sitzia

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Sitzia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Sitzia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Sitzia. John Sitzia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cotterell, Phil, Carolyn Morris, Peter Beresford, et al.. (2010). Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users. Health Expectations. 14(2). 159–169. 45 indexed citations
2.
Smith, E., Peter Beresford, Jill Manthorpe, et al.. (2009). Getting ready for user involvement in a systematic review. Health Expectations. 12(2). 197–208. 31 indexed citations
3.
Cotterell, Phil, Carolyn Morris, Peter Beresford, et al.. (2008). Identifying the impact of service user involvement on the lives of people affected by cancer: Final report. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 119(46). e2121744119–e2121744119. 6 indexed citations
4.
Richardson, Alison, et al.. (2007). Patients’ needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools. Supportive Care in Cancer. 15(10). 1125–1144. 171 indexed citations
5.
Cotterell, Phil, et al.. (2006). Evaluation of a collaborative model for consumer research panels in cancer research networks. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 53(10). 1721–2. 2 indexed citations
6.
Sitzia, John, Phil Cotterell, & Alison Richardson. (2006). Interprofessional collaboration with service users in the development of cancer services: The Cancer Partnership Project. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 20(1). 60–74. 23 indexed citations
7.
Smith, E., Fiona Ross, Jill Manthorpe, et al.. (2006). Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: A review of evidence and practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 45(2). 298–315. 87 indexed citations
8.
Richardson, Alison, John Sitzia, & Phil Cotterell. (2005). ‘Working the system’. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups. Health Expectations. 8(3). 210–220. 18 indexed citations
9.
Sitzia, John, Phil Cotterell, & Alison Richardson. (2004). Formative evaluation of the cancer partnership project. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 12 indexed citations
10.
Sitzia, John. (2002). Barriers to research utilisation: the clinical setting and nurses themselves. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 18(4). 230–243. 58 indexed citations
11.
Kaul, Vivek, et al.. (2001). Should we continue oesophageal surgery in a district general hospital? A review of 200 consecutive cases.. PubMed. 83(3). 167–71. 9 indexed citations
12.
Sitzia, John. (2001). Barriers to research utilization: the clinical setting and nurses themselves. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 5(3). 154–164. 57 indexed citations
13.
Sitzia, John & Neil Wood. (1999). Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with chemotherapy nursing care. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 3(3). 126–140. 16 indexed citations
14.
Sitzia, John, et al.. (1998). Study of patient satisfaction with chemotherapy nursing care. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2(3). 142–153. 23 indexed citations
15.
Sitzia, John, et al.. (1998). Evaluation of a nurse-led multidisciplinary neurological rehabilitation programme using the Nottingham Health Profile. Clinical Rehabilitation. 12(5). 389–394. 24 indexed citations
16.
Sitzia, John, et al.. (1997). Psychometric evaluation of a squestionnaire to document side‐effects of chemotherapy. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 25(5). 999–1007. 24 indexed citations
17.
Sitzia, John, et al.. (1997). Side effects of CHOP in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer Nursing. 20(6). 430–439. 37 indexed citations
18.
Sitzia, John, et al.. (1996). Patient Satisfaction on a Medical Day Ward: a Comparison of Nurse-led and Physician-led Services. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 8(2). 175–185. 8 indexed citations
19.
Sitzia, John. (1995). Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae. European Journal of Cancer Care. 4(1). 11–16. 157 indexed citations
20.
Sitzia, John, et al.. (1995). A study of patients' experiences of side-effects associated with chemotherapy: pilot stage report. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 32(6). 580–600. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026