John S. Mancoll

897 total citations
11 papers, 651 citations indexed

About

John S. Mancoll is a scholar working on Surgery, Dermatology and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, John S. Mancoll has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 651 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Dermatology and 2 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in John S. Mancoll's work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers). John S. Mancoll is often cited by papers focused on Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers). John S. Mancoll collaborates with scholars based in United States. John S. Mancoll's co-authors include Raymond M. Dunn, Linda G. Phillips, Steven J. Blackwell, Bradon J. Wilhelmi, John H. Miller, John L. Burns, Michael T. Longaker, George K. Gittes, Steve Lee and Jiangang Zhao and has published in prestigious journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery and Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

In The Last Decade

John S. Mancoll

11 papers receiving 629 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John S. Mancoll United States 11 443 126 112 65 44 11 651
N. Scuderi Italy 16 466 1.1× 87 0.7× 163 1.5× 156 2.4× 32 0.7× 66 826
Takatoshi Yotsuyanagi Japan 21 843 1.9× 157 1.2× 113 1.0× 132 2.0× 21 0.5× 70 1.2k
Eser Yüksel United States 19 634 1.4× 58 0.5× 84 0.8× 68 1.0× 50 1.1× 41 956
Harold I. Friedman United States 16 308 0.7× 67 0.5× 135 1.2× 175 2.7× 29 0.7× 43 759
Paolo Erba Switzerland 15 529 1.2× 211 1.7× 91 0.8× 85 1.3× 54 1.2× 44 838
Frederick R. Heckler United States 17 638 1.4× 108 0.9× 125 1.1× 89 1.4× 177 4.0× 38 954
BRIAN D. BUCALO United States 7 238 0.5× 277 2.2× 130 1.2× 35 0.5× 35 0.8× 9 646
Romed Meirer Austria 17 461 1.0× 175 1.4× 64 0.6× 61 0.9× 221 5.0× 33 733
Laurence A. Chait South Africa 12 429 1.0× 97 0.8× 113 1.0× 43 0.7× 28 0.6× 31 653
Hugo B. Kitzinger Austria 14 624 1.4× 173 1.4× 131 1.2× 111 1.7× 39 0.9× 36 804

Countries citing papers authored by John S. Mancoll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John S. Mancoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John S. Mancoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John S. Mancoll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John S. Mancoll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John S. Mancoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John S. Mancoll. The network helps show where John S. Mancoll may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John S. Mancoll

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John S. Mancoll. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John S. Mancoll based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John S. Mancoll. John S. Mancoll is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Burns, John L., John S. Mancoll, & Linda G. Phillips. (2003). Impairments to wound healing. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 30(1). 47–56. 63 indexed citations
2.
Wilhelmi, Bradon J., et al.. (2001). Do Not Use Epinephrine in Digital Blocks: Myth or Truth?. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 107(2). 393–397. 88 indexed citations
3.
Wilhelmi, Bradon J., Steven J. Blackwell, John S. Mancoll, & Linda G. Phillips. (1999). Another Indication for Liposuction: Small Facial Lipomas. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 103(7). 1864–1867. 30 indexed citations
4.
Wilhelmi, Bradon J., Steven J. Blackwell, John H. Miller, John S. Mancoll, & Linda G. Phillips. (1998). Epinephrine in Digital Blocks: Revisited. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 41(4). 410–414. 55 indexed citations
5.
Blackwell, Steven J., et al.. (1998). Creep vs. Stretch: A Review of the Viscoelastic Properties of Skin. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 41(2). 215–219. 113 indexed citations
6.
Mancoll, John S., et al.. (1998). Tamoxifen Downregulates TGF-β Production in Keloid Fibroblasts. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 40(5). 490–493. 72 indexed citations
7.
Mancoll, John S., et al.. (1997). The Effect of Pentoxifylline on Random-Pattern Skin-Flap Necrosis Induced by Nicotine Treatment in the Rat. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 100(1). 66–71. 30 indexed citations
8.
Dunn, Raymond M., et al.. (1993). Experimental and Clinical Use of pH Monitoring of Free Tissue Transfers. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 31(6). 539–545. 23 indexed citations
9.
Dunn, Raymond M., et al.. (1993). The Rat Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap: A True Myocutaneous Flap Model. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 31(4). 352–357. 34 indexed citations
10.
Dunn, Raymond M. & John S. Mancoll. (1992). Flap Models in the Rat: A Review and Reappraisal. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 90(2). 319–328. 73 indexed citations
11.
Dunn, Raymond M. & John S. Mancoll. (1992). Flap Models in the Rat: A Review and Reappraisal. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 90(2). 319–328. 70 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026