Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Nanoparticle networks reduce the flammability of polymer nanocomposites
2005775 citationsTakashi Kashiwagi, Fangming Du et al.Nature Materialsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Shields
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Shields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Shields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Shields more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Shields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Shields. The network helps show where John R. Shields may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Shields
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Shields.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Shields based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Shields. John R. Shields is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zammarano, Mauro, et al.. (2016). Smoldering and Flame Resistant Textiles via Conformal Barrier Formation | NIST. Advanced Materials.1 indexed citations
4.
Manzello, Samuel L., et al.. (2011). Determining Structure Vulnerabilities to Firebrand Showers in Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires | NIST. Fire Safety Journal. 46.6 indexed citations
5.
Manzello, Samuel L., et al.. (2010). QUANTIFYING WIND DRIVEN FIREBRAND PENETRATION INTO BUILDING VENTS USING FULL SCALE AND REDUDCED SCALE EXPERIMENTAL METHODS | NIST.1 indexed citations
Manzello, Samuel L., et al.. (2007). Measurement Of Firebrand Production And Heat Release Rate (Hrr) From Burning Korean Pine Trees. 7. 108–108.15 indexed citations
Gilman, Jeffrey W., Rick D. Davis, John R. Shields, & Richard H. Harris. (2005). High Throughput Flammability Characterization Using Gradient Flux Fields. Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 2(9).1 indexed citations
10.
Kashiwagi, Takashi, Fangming Du, Jack F. Douglas, et al.. (2005). Nanoparticle Networks Reduce the Flammability of Polymer Nanocomposites. | NIST. Nature Materials. 4(12).3 indexed citations
11.
Kashiwagi, Takashi, Fangming Du, Jack F. Douglas, et al.. (2005). Nanoparticle networks reduce the flammability of polymer nanocomposites. Nature Materials. 4(12). 928–933.775 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Manzello, Samuel L., Thomas G. Cleary, John R. Shields, & Jiann C. Yang. (2005). On the ignition of fuel beds by firebrands. Fire and Materials. 30(1). 77–87.95 indexed citations
13.
Kashiwagi, Takashi, Richard H. Harris, Robert M. Briber, et al.. (2004). Flame Retardant Mechanism of Polyamid 6 - Clay Nanocompsoites. Polymer.1 indexed citations
Kashiwagi, Takashi, Alexander B. Morgan, Joseph M. Antonucci, et al.. (2003). Thermal and Flammability Properties of a Silica-PMMA Nanocomposite | NIST. Chemistry of Materials. 89(8).
17.
Pitts, William M., James R. Lawson, & John R. Shields. (2001). NIST/BFRL CALIBRATION SYSTEM FOR HEAT-FLUX GAGES | NIST.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.