This map shows the geographic impact of John Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Nash more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Nash. The network helps show where John Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Nash
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Nash.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Nash based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Nash. John Nash is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nash, John, et al.. (2012). Deregulating the Transfer of Agricultural Technology. The World Bank Research Observer.1 indexed citations
4.
McCalla, Alex F. & John Nash. (2007). Key issues for a pro-development outcome of the Doha Round. World Bank eBooks. 1–330.
5.
Josling, Tim, Alex F. McCalla, & John Nash. (2007). An overview of the WTO agricultural negotiations.. 20–73.5 indexed citations
6.
Hoekman, Bernard, Francis Ng, Marcelo Olarreaga, Alex F. McCalla, & John Nash. (2007). The impact of agricultural support policies on developing countries.. 100–131.2 indexed citations
7.
McCalla, Alex F., et al.. (2007). Coalitions and alliance strategies for developing countries in the Doha round of agricultural negotiations.. 132–153.1 indexed citations
Ingco, Merlinda D. & John Nash. (2004). Agriculture and the WTO : Creating a Trading System for Development. World Bank Publications.36 indexed citations
10.
Gorter, Harry de, et al.. (2004). Market access: economics and the effects of policy instruments.. 63–94.3 indexed citations
11.
MacKenzie, Donald J., et al.. (2004). Agricultural biotechnology: a primer for policymakers.. 235–251.1 indexed citations
12.
Ingco, Merlinda D. & John Nash. (2004). What's at stake? Developing-country interests in the Doha Development Round.. 1–22.4 indexed citations
13.
Zarrilli, Simonetta, et al.. (2004). The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement, food safety policies, and product attributes.. 215–234.4 indexed citations
14.
Ingco, Merlinda D., et al.. (2004). Global intellectual property rights: a new factor in farming.. 253–268.1 indexed citations
15.
Ingco, Merlinda D., et al.. (2004). Rules and options for special and differential treatment.. 269–290.1 indexed citations
16.
Ingco, Merlinda D., Donald Mitchell, & John Nash. (2004). Food security and agricultural trade policy reform.. 179–191.6 indexed citations
17.
Brooks, Karen & John Nash. (2002). The rural sector in transition economies. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1547–1592.9 indexed citations
Nash, John, et al.. (1998). Trade policy reform : lessons and implications. World Bank eBooks.15 indexed citations
20.
Nash, John, et al.. (1989). The New Political Economy: Positive Economics and Negative Politics. SSRN Electronic Journal.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.