John McNamee

31 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

John McNamee
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Numerical Analysis 217
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 301
  • Mechanics of Materials 368
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 269
  • Applied Mathematics 105
Replace W. Nachbar with:
W. Nachbar United States
R. V. Churchill United States
Carl E. Pearson United States
R. M. Redheffer United States
Richard C. Roberts United Kingdom
W. S. Loud United States
R. P. Kanwal United States
J. W. Thomas United States
Solomon G. Mikhlin United States
R. Glowinski France
John McNamee relative to W. Nachbar United States W. Nachbar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
W. Nachbar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John McNamee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John McNamee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McNamee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McNamee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John McNamee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McNamee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McNamee. The network helps show where John McNamee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John McNamee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John McNamee Line = papers co-authored together John McNamee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1961253
2 1960178
3 1960170
4 199392
5
Numerical methods for roots of polynomials
201378
6 196762
7 196046
8 196446
9 197144
10 196139
11 196132
12 196131
13 200227
14 196326
15 199723
16 197123
17 200421
18 195919
19 199918
20 196417

About John McNamee

John McNamee is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Geometry and Topology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (6 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (5 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (3 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (2 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (2 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (217 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (301 citations), Mechanics of Materials (368 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (269 citations) and Applied Mathematics (105 citations). John McNamee has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. E. Gibson, Victor Y. Pan, Frank Stenger, A. Dalgarno, W. G. Bickley, Hans Sagan, A. Butcher, R. C. Jennison, M. Cohen and Patrick J̈emmer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Mathematics of Computation, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software and International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact