John McClure

5.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
113 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

John McClure is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, John McClure has authored 113 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 21 papers in Social Psychology and 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in John McClure's work include Disaster Management and Resilience (38 papers), Risk Perception and Management (29 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers). John McClure is often cited by papers focused on Disaster Management and Resilience (38 papers), Risk Perception and Management (29 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers). John McClure collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. John McClure's co-authors include Douglas Paton, Richard J. Siegert, David Johnston, Frank H. Walkey, Robbie M. Sutton, Emma E.H. Doyle, Julia Becker, Denis Hilton, Michael Allen and Matthew J. Spittal and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

John McClure

110 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework fo... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 2017 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John McClure New Zealand 31 2.1k 574 524 443 369 113 3.6k
Kevin R. Ronan Australia 37 2.1k 1.0× 506 0.9× 765 1.5× 924 2.1× 91 0.2× 100 4.5k
Michele Settanni Italy 31 1.7k 0.8× 317 0.6× 976 1.9× 109 0.2× 141 0.4× 94 3.8k
William J. Burns United States 30 1.1k 0.5× 262 0.5× 309 0.6× 53 0.1× 183 0.5× 108 3.9k
Thomas Shelley Duval United States 18 883 0.4× 180 0.3× 416 0.8× 248 0.6× 151 0.4× 26 1.6k
Dana Rose Garfin United States 23 1.1k 0.5× 144 0.3× 506 1.0× 143 0.3× 129 0.3× 67 3.2k
Sarah R. Lowe United States 39 1.1k 0.5× 144 0.3× 608 1.2× 673 1.5× 60 0.2× 176 4.2k
Charles C. Benight United States 34 955 0.5× 183 0.3× 847 1.6× 515 1.2× 71 0.2× 80 5.0k
Susan Stevens United States 10 2.3k 1.1× 734 1.3× 300 0.6× 696 1.6× 42 0.1× 20 4.2k
Monica Martinussen Norway 39 1.1k 0.6× 245 0.4× 1.6k 3.0× 77 0.2× 318 0.9× 156 6.9k
Krzysztof Kaniasty United States 32 2.5k 1.2× 301 0.5× 1.0k 2.0× 2.2k 4.9× 76 0.2× 64 8.0k

Countries citing papers authored by John McClure

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John McClure's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McClure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McClure more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John McClure

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McClure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McClure. The network helps show where John McClure may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John McClure

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John McClure. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John McClure based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John McClure. John McClure is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vinnell, Lauren J., Taciano L. Milfont, & John McClure. (2023). Natural hazard versus natural disaster: Does framing the event affect preparedness intentions, attitudes, and behaviour?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18. 3 indexed citations
3.
McClure, John, Ilan Noy, Yoshihisa Kashima, & Taciano L. Milfont. (2022). Attributions for extreme weather events: science and the people. Climatic Change. 174(3-4). 22–22. 11 indexed citations
4.
McClure, John, et al.. (2020). Is independence enough? Rehabilitation should include autonomy and social engagement to achieve quality of life. Clinical Rehabilitation. 35(1). 3–12. 16 indexed citations
5.
Francis, Norbert, et al.. (2019). Awareness of Form and Pattern in Literacy Assessment: Classroom Applications for First and Second Language.. ˜The œreading matrix. 19(1). 20–34.
6.
McClure, John, et al.. (2017). Misconceptions about Stroke: Causal Attributions for Stroke-Related Symptoms Reflect the Age of the Survivor. Brain Impairment. 18(3). 299–309. 8 indexed citations
7.
Becker, Julia, Douglas Paton, David Johnston, Kevin R. Ronan, & John McClure. (2017). The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 22. 179–193. 236 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
McClure, John, et al.. (2014). When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes. Natural Hazards. 75(1). 635–652. 35 indexed citations
9.
McClure, John, et al.. (2011). New Zealanders' judgments of earthquake risk before and after the Canterbury earthquake: Do they relate to preparedness?. New Zealand journal of psychology. 40(4). 7. 6 indexed citations
10.
Doyle, Emma E.H., David Johnston, John McClure, & Douglas Paton. (2011). The Communication of Uncertain Scientific Advice During Natural Hazard Events. New Zealand journal of psychology. 40(4). 39–50. 25 indexed citations
11.
Linden, Mark & John McClure. (2011). The Causal Attributions of Nursing Students Toward Adolescent Survivors of Brain Injury. Nursing Research. 61(1). 58–65. 14 indexed citations
12.
McClure, John. (2011). The role of causal attributions in public misconceptions about brain injury.. Rehabilitation Psychology. 56(2). 85–93. 39 indexed citations
13.
McClure, John, et al.. (2010). Attributions and Expectations for the Behavior of Persons With Brain Injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 26(5). 392–396. 8 indexed citations
14.
Крейнович, Владик, John McClure, & John Symons. (2008). The End of Theory? Does the Data Deluge Make the Scientific Method Obsolete?. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 17 indexed citations
15.
McClure, John, et al.. (2008). Attributions for behaviours of persons with brain injury: The role of perceived severity and time since injury. Brain Injury. 22(9). 639–648. 23 indexed citations
16.
McClure, John, et al.. (2006). Visible markers of brain injury influence attributions for adolescents’ behaviour. Brain Injury. 20(10). 1029–1035. 22 indexed citations
17.
Siegert, Richard J., et al.. (2005). Theory of mind in schizophrenia: A critical review. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. 10(4). 249–286. 282 indexed citations
18.
McClure, John, et al.. (2001). Constraints on equifinality: Goals are good explanations only for controllable outcomes. British Journal of Social Psychology. 40(1). 99–115. 9 indexed citations
19.
Sutton, Robbie M. & John McClure. (2001). Covariational influences on goal-based explanation: An integrative model.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 80(2). 222–236. 28 indexed citations
20.
McClure, John. (1998). Discounting causes of behavior: Are two reasons better than one?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74(1). 7–20. 94 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026