John Lee Hooker
About
In The Last Decade
John Lee Hooker
1 paper receiving 48 citations
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref
| Author | Last Decade | Papers | Cites | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Lee Hooker | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 67 | |
| Jenny Reddish | 9 0.9× | 5 0.6× | 9 1.1× | 2 0.3× | 6 | 83 | ||
| Herbert Arkin | 4 0.4× | 1 0.1× | 16 2.0× | 5 0.7× | 12 1.7× | 3 | 221 | |
| M. Nessi | 11 1.1× | 2 0.2× | 6 0.8× | 3 0.4× | 3 | 42 | ||
| James Forsyth | 11 1.1× | 25 2.8× | 2 0.3× | 4 0.6× | 5 | 222 | ||
| Bede | 7 0.7× | 9 1.0× | 1 0.1× | 4 | 85 | |||
| Michelle Johnson | 7 0.7× | 7 0.8× | 7 0.9× | 2 0.3× | 3 | 58 | ||
| Angelo Barili | 28 2.8× | 46 5.1× | 3 0.4× | 3 0.4× | 2 | 77 | ||
| M. Cemre Üstünkaya | 34 3.4× | 15 1.7× | 4 0.5× | 5 | 50 | |||
| E. S. Craighill Handy | 48 4.8× | 16 1.8× | 7 0.9× | 6 | 242 | |||
| Robert R. Shrock | 30 3.0× | 2 0.2× | 15 1.9× | 1 0.1× | 3 0.4× | 2 | 77 |
Countries citing papers authored by John Lee Hooker
This map shows the geographic impact of John Lee Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lee Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lee Hooker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Lee Hooker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lee Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lee Hooker. The network helps show where John Lee Hooker may publish in the future.
All Works
Loading papers...
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.