Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The role of sawdust in the removal of unwanted materials from water
Countries citing papers authored by John L. Margrave
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Margrave's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Margrave with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Margrave more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Margrave
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Margrave. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Margrave. The network helps show where John L. Margrave may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John L. Margrave
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John L. Margrave.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John L. Margrave based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John L. Margrave. John L. Margrave is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Margrave, John L. & K. F. Zmbov. (2011). Mass spectrometric studies at high temperatures. XXVII.. The Journal of Chemical Physics.
2.
Chiang, I. W., Bruce E. Brinson, Peter A. Willis, et al.. (2001). Purification and Characterization of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (SWNTs) Obtained from the Gas-Phase Decomposition of CO (HiPco Process). The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 105(35). 8297–8301.588 indexed citations breakdown →
Khabashesku, Valéry N., John L. Zimmerman, & John L. Margrave. (2000). Powder Synthesis and Characterization of Amorphous Carbon Nitride. Chemistry of Materials. 12(11). 3264–3270.589 indexed citations breakdown →
Ball, David W., Leif Fredin, Zakya H. Kafafi, Robert H. Hauge, & John L. Margrave. (1988). A Bibliography of Matrix Isolation Spectroscopy 1954-1985. EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University).15 indexed citations
Giessen, B.C., et al.. (1978). Materials science experiments in space.4 indexed citations
10.
Bennett, S. L., et al.. (1976). Negative ion electron impact studies of arsenic trihalides: AsF/sub 3/, AsCl/sub 3/, and AsBr/sub 3/.1 indexed citations
11.
Margrave, John L., et al.. (1975). A study of phase transitions in lead difluoride by use of polychromatic X-ray diffraction. High Temperatures-High Pressures. 7.1 indexed citations
Margrave, John L., et al.. (1972). Polychromatic X-ray diffraction - A rapid and versatile technique for the study of solids under high pressure and high temperature.. High Temperatures-High Pressures. 4.1 indexed citations
14.
Margrave, John L. & K. F. Zmbov. (1967). Mass spectrometric studies at high temperatures. XVI.. The Journal of Physical Chemistry.4 indexed citations
15.
Besenbruch, G. E., T.V. Charlu, K. F. Zmbov, & John L. Margrave. (1967). Mass spectrometric studies at high temperatures. Journal of the Less Common Metals. 12(5). 375–381.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.