John L. Bell
Impact in
- Oncology top 5%
- Cancer survivorship and care
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- R. Eric Heidel (12 shared papers)Amila Orucevic (8 shared papers)Derek R. Hopko (7 shared papers)Maria E. A. Armento (4 shared papers)Carl W. Lejuez (4 shared papers)Sarah Robertson (3 shared papers)Melissa K. Hunt (2 shared papers)Nicole J. Wolf (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The American Surgeon (9 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (5 papers)The Breast Journal (4 papers)Surgical Clinics of North America (3 papers)Clinical Infectious Diseases (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomRussia
In The Last Decade
John L. Bell
62 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Oncology 622
- Cancer Research 308
- Applied Psychology 101
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 296
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
Countries citing papers authored by John L. Bell
This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Bell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Bell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Bell. The network helps show where John L. Bell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John L. Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 158 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 85 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 75 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 73 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 55 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 50 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 44 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 42 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 41 | |
| 15 | 1961 | 40 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 36 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 30 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 20 | 1958 | 25 |
About John L. Bell
John L. Bell is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (18 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (10 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (622 citations), Cancer Research (308 citations), Applied Psychology (101 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (296 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations). John L. Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include R. Eric Heidel, Amila Orucevic, Derek R. Hopko, Maria E. A. Armento, Carl W. Lejuez, Sarah Robertson, Melissa K. Hunt, Nicole J. Wolf, Michael L. Mason and Wendy Likes. Their work appears in journals such as The American Surgeon, The American Journal of Surgery, The Breast Journal, Surgical Clinics of North America and Clinical Infectious Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.