John King Gamble

3.2k total citations
67 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

John King Gamble is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Political Science and International Relations and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John King Gamble has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 16 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 15 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in John King Gamble's work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (24 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (12 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (12 papers). John King Gamble is often cited by papers focused on Quantum and electron transport phenomena (24 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (12 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (12 papers). John King Gamble collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. John King Gamble's co-authors include Mark Friesen, S. N. Coppersmith, M. A. Eriksson, Erik Nielsen, D. E. Savage, M. G. Lagally, Teck Seng Koh, J. R. Prance, Zhan Shi and Daniel R. Ward and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

John King Gamble

59 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John King Gamble United States	19	1.3k	789	673	134	113	67	1.8k
Wuxin Liu China	16	901 0.7×	820 1.0×	160 0.2×	51 0.4×	54 0.5×	23	1.3k
Philippe Blanchard France	19	316 0.2×	71 0.1×	203 0.3×	41 0.3×	33 0.3×	83	1.1k
R. M. Benito Spain	23	730 0.5×	139 0.2×	96 0.1×	145 1.1×	10 0.1×	163	2.0k
Thomas Fink Germany	20	571 0.4×	130 0.2×	490 0.7×	320 2.4×	45 0.4×	79	1.5k
Runyao Duan China	25	1.2k 0.9×	1.5k 1.9×	97 0.1×	74 0.6×	173 1.5×	83	1.9k
Xin-Qi Li China	22	1.3k 1.0×	257 0.3×	538 0.8×	497 3.7×	10 0.1×	104	1.6k
Kenneth Rudinger United States	14	525 0.4×	740 0.9×	205 0.3×	45 0.3×	107 0.9×	28	1.0k
Adrian Cho United States	13	207 0.2×	87 0.1×	100 0.1×	190 1.4×	19 0.2×	128	788
M.J. Kearney United Kingdom	21	415 0.3×	205 0.3×	650 1.0×	110 0.8×	7 0.1×	96	1.2k
E. Cota Mexico	15	498 0.4×	67 0.1×	218 0.3×	147 1.1×	49 0.4×	45	833

Countries citing papers authored by John King Gamble

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John King Gamble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John King Gamble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John King Gamble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John King Gamble

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John King Gamble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John King Gamble. The network helps show where John King Gamble may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John King Gamble

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John King Gamble. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John King Gamble based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John King Gamble. John King Gamble is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Chen, Jwo-Sy, Erik Nielsen, Matthew Ebert, et al.. (2024). Benchmarking a trapped-ion quantum computer with 30 qubits. Quantum. 8. 1516–1516. 33 indexed citations

Baczewski, Andrew, et al.. (2021). Full configuration interaction simulations of exchange-coupled donors in silicon using multi-valley effective mass theory. New Journal of Physics. 23(7). 73007–73007. 13 indexed citations

Schuwalow, Sergej, Niels B. M. Schröter, Jan Gukelberger, et al.. (2020). Band Structure Extraction at Hybrid Narrow‐Gap Semiconductor–Metal Interfaces. Advanced Science. 8(4). 2003087–2003087. 18 indexed citations

Pauka, Sebastian, J. D. S. Witt, Claudine Nì. Allen, et al.. (2020). Repairing the surface of InAs-based topological heterostructures. Journal of Applied Physics. 128(11). 9 indexed citations

Baczewski, Andrew, Ezra Bussmann, John King Gamble, et al.. (2018). Multiscale Modeling of Dopant Arrays in Silicon. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 2018. 1 indexed citations

Harvey-Collard, Patrick, N. Tobias Jacobson, Jason Dominguez, et al.. (2017). Coherent coupling between a quantum dot and a donor in silicon. Nature Communications. 8(1). 1029–1029. 49 indexed citations

Ward, Daniel R., J. R. Prance, John King Gamble, et al.. (2015). Transport through an impurity tunnel coupled to a Si/SiGe quantum dot. Applied Physics Letters. 107(10). 11 indexed citations

Kim, Dohun, Daniel R. Ward, C. B. Simmons, et al.. (2015). Microwave-driven coherent operation of a semiconductor quantum dot charge qubit. Nature Nanotechnology. 10(3). 243–247. 80 indexed citations

Gamble, John King, et al.. (2014). Choice of Official Text in Multilateral Treaties: The Interplay of Law, Politics, Language, Pragmatism and (Multi)-Nationalism. 12(2). 29.

10.

Blume-Kohout, Robin, John King Gamble, Erik Nielsen, et al.. (2013). Robust, self-consistent, closed-form tomography of quantum logic gates on a trapped ion qubit. arXiv (Cornell University). 15 indexed citations

11.

Gamble, John King. (2007). Teaching Or Get Off The Lectern: Impediments To Improving International Law Teaching. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 13(2). 379–385. 2 indexed citations

12.

Gamble, John King, et al.. (2005). Human-Centric International Law: A Model and a Search for Empirical Indicators. eYLS (Yale Law School). 14(1). 61. 5 indexed citations

13.

Gamble, John King, et al.. (2001). Human Rights Treaties: A Suggested Typology, an Historical Perspective. eYLS (Yale Law School). 7(1). 33.

14.

Gamble, John King & Charlotte Ku. (2000). International Law - New Actors and New Technologies: Center Stage for NGOs. eYLS (Yale Law School). 31(2). 221. 15 indexed citations

15.

Gamble, John King. (1996). International Law and the Information Age. Michigan Journal of International Law. 17(3). 747–799. 1 indexed citations

16.

Gamble, John King, et al.. (1989). International Legal Scholarship: A Perspective on Teaching and Publishing.. Journal of legal education. 39(1). 39–46. 1 indexed citations

17.

Gamble, John King, et al.. (1986). International Law’s Response to the New International Economic Order: An Overview. Boston College international and comparative law review. 9(2). 257. 2 indexed citations

18.

Gamble, John King, et al.. (1984). The 1982 Convention and Customary Law of the Sea: Observations, a Framework, and a Warning. San Diego law review. 21(3). 491. 4 indexed citations

19.

Gamble, John King. (1983). The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea and the New International Economic Order. Loyola of Los Angeles international & comparative law review. 6(1). 65. 1 indexed citations

20.

Gamble, John King, et al.. (1980). Multilateral Treaties: An Assessment of the Concept of Laterality. Loyola of Los Angeles international & comparative law review. 3(1). 19.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact