John J. Paris

1.2k total citations
86 papers, 730 citations indexed

About

John J. Paris is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, John J. Paris has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 730 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 39 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 30 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in John J. Paris's work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (42 papers), Ethics in medical practice (29 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (27 papers). John J. Paris is often cited by papers focused on Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (42 papers), Ethics in medical practice (29 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (27 papers). John J. Paris collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Vietnam. John J. Paris's co-authors include Frank E. Reardon, Michael D. Schreiber, Robert K. Crone, Brian Cummings, Mark Siegler, J. S. Ahluwalia, Michael P. Moore, Anne B. Fletcher, Mindy B. Statter and A C Elias-Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and PEDIATRICS.

In The Last Decade

John J. Paris

80 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John J. Paris United States 14 378 378 292 104 91 86 730
Maliheh Kadivar Iran 16 260 0.7× 127 0.3× 73 0.3× 226 2.2× 67 0.7× 99 647
Gregg VandeKieft United States 6 70 0.2× 212 0.6× 240 0.8× 25 0.2× 45 0.5× 26 546
Susan A. Beebe United States 8 237 0.6× 86 0.2× 58 0.2× 100 1.0× 55 0.6× 9 401
Gunnar Duttge Germany 13 96 0.3× 322 0.9× 157 0.5× 48 0.5× 162 1.8× 79 577
Laura R. Kair United States 18 285 0.8× 232 0.6× 88 0.3× 129 1.2× 32 0.4× 55 849
Sheila Kelly United Kingdom 11 105 0.3× 229 0.6× 132 0.5× 77 0.7× 107 1.2× 20 562
Allyson Shephard Canada 6 174 0.5× 140 0.4× 169 0.6× 34 0.3× 51 0.6× 8 442
Alison Volpe Holmes United States 15 504 1.3× 252 0.7× 156 0.5× 169 1.6× 20 0.2× 27 775
Antoine Payot Canada 13 485 1.3× 188 0.5× 130 0.4× 256 2.5× 110 1.2× 37 677
Rachel Levi Israel 6 265 0.7× 146 0.4× 68 0.2× 14 0.1× 102 1.1× 14 458

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Paris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Paris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Paris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Paris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Paris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Paris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Paris. The network helps show where John J. Paris may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John J. Paris

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John J. Paris. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John J. Paris based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John J. Paris. John J. Paris is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cummings, Brian, Mark R. Mercurio, & John J. Paris. (2020). A review of approaches for resolving disputes between physicians and families on end-of-life care for newborns. Journal of Perinatology. 40(9). 1441–1445. 2 indexed citations
2.
Paris, John J., et al.. (2018). The Catholic Tradition on the Due Use of Medical Remedies: The Charlie Gard Case. Theological Studies. 79(1). 165–181. 1 indexed citations
3.
Paris, John J., et al.. (2017). The Charlie Gard case: British and American approaches to court resolution of disputes over medical decisions. Journal of Perinatology. 37(12). 1268–1271. 15 indexed citations
4.
Paris, John J., Peter Angelos, & Michael D. Schreiber. (2010). Does compassion for a family justify providing futile CPR?. Journal of Perinatology. 30(12). 770–772. 9 indexed citations
5.
Paris, John J., et al.. (2007). Parental Refusal of Medical Treatment for a Newborn. Metamedicine. 28(5). 427–441. 11 indexed citations
6.
Paris, John J., Neil Graham, Michael D. Schreiber, & Michele Goodwin. (2006). Has the Emphasis on Autonomy Gone Too Far? Insights From Dostoevsky and Parental Decisionmaking in NICU. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 8 indexed citations
7.
Paris, John J., et al.. (2006). Has the Emphasis on Autonomy Gone Too Far? Insights from Dostoevsky on Parental Decisionmaking in the NICU. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 15(2). 147–151. 4 indexed citations
8.
Paris, John J., et al.. (2006). Approaches to end-of-life decision-making in the NICU: insights from Dostoevsky's The Grand Inquisitor. Journal of Perinatology. 26(7). 389–391. 14 indexed citations
9.
Paris, John J., Michael Schreiber, & Frank E. Reardon. (2004). The “Emergent Circumstances” Exception to the Need for Consent: The Texas Supreme Court Ruling in Miller v. HCA. Journal of Perinatology. 24(6). 337–342. 13 indexed citations
10.
Paris, John J.. (2002). Harvesting organs from cadavers: an ethical challenge.. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 186(14). 9–12. 1 indexed citations
11.
Paris, John J. & Frank E. Reardon. (2001). Bad Cases Make Bad Law: HCA v. Miller is not a Guide for Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Newborns. Journal of Perinatology. 21(8). 541–544. 7 indexed citations
12.
Paris, John J. & Mary Catherine Harris. (2001). Ethical Issues in Fetal Surgery Involving a Twin Pregnancy. Journal of Women s Health & Gender-Based Medicine. 10(6). 525–531. 4 indexed citations
13.
Paris, John J., Horace M. DeLisser, & Rashmin C. Savani. (2000). Ending Innovative Therapy for Infants at the Margins of Viability: Case of Twins H. Journal of Perinatology. 20(4). 251–256. 4 indexed citations
14.
Paris, John J., Jaideep Singh, Michael D. Schreiber, & Frank E. Reardon. (1999). Unilateral Do-Not-Resuscitate Order in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Journal of Perinatology. 19(5). 383–387. 5 indexed citations
15.
Paris, John J., et al.. (1995). "Playing God" and the Removal of Life-Prolonging Therapy. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 20(4). 403–418. 3 indexed citations
16.
Paris, John J., et al.. (1993). Beyond Autonomy -- Physicians' Refusal to Use Life-Prolonging Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. New England Journal of Medicine. 329(5). 354–357. 48 indexed citations
17.
Paris, John J. & Frank E. Reardon. (1992). Physician Refusal of Requests for Futile or Ineffective Interventions. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1(2). 127–134. 24 indexed citations
18.
Paris, John J., Robert K. Crone, & Frank E. Reardon. (1990). Physicians' Refusal of Requested Treatment. New England Journal of Medicine. 322(14). 1012–1015. 89 indexed citations
19.
Paris, John J.. (1986). When Burdens of Feeding Outweigh Benefits. The Hastings Center Report. 16(1). 30–32. 20 indexed citations
20.
Paris, John J. & Richard A. McCormick. (1983). Saving defective infants: options for life or death.. PubMed. 148(16). 313–7. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026