John J. Keane

1.9k total citations
63 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

John J. Keane is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, John J. Keane has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Ecology, 30 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 27 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in John J. Keane's work include Fire effects on ecosystems (28 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (20 papers). John J. Keane is often cited by papers focused on Fire effects on ecosystems (28 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (20 papers). John J. Keane collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Romania. John J. Keane's co-authors include M. Zachariah Peery, R. J. Gutiérrez, Gavin M. Jones, Sarah C. Sawyer, Sheila A. Whitmore, Connor M. Wood, Brandon M. Collins, Scott L. Stephens, Thomas E. Munton and Malcolm P. North and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Conservation Biology and Oecologia.

In The Last Decade

John J. Keane

62 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John J. Keane United States 21 1.0k 806 572 387 165 63 1.5k
Jeffrey J. Buler United States 23 1.3k 1.2× 641 0.8× 196 0.3× 345 0.9× 109 0.7× 52 1.6k
R. Neal Wilkins United States 21 918 0.9× 349 0.4× 322 0.6× 229 0.6× 82 0.5× 54 1.2k
Mark E. Seamans United States 19 1.1k 1.0× 484 0.6× 539 0.9× 458 1.2× 57 0.3× 43 1.3k
Keith L. Pardieck United States 13 936 0.9× 298 0.4× 403 0.7× 543 1.4× 50 0.3× 20 1.2k
R. J. Gutiérrez United States 19 726 0.7× 445 0.6× 405 0.7× 265 0.7× 78 0.5× 50 1.1k
José A. Alves Iceland 25 1.6k 1.6× 360 0.4× 350 0.6× 586 1.5× 77 0.5× 94 1.9k
David J. Ziolkowski United States 12 811 0.8× 265 0.3× 345 0.6× 451 1.2× 54 0.3× 15 1.1k
Stephen K. Davis Canada 23 1.5k 1.4× 455 0.6× 610 1.1× 273 0.7× 70 0.4× 62 1.7k
Emily B. Cohen United States 20 1.2k 1.2× 261 0.3× 241 0.4× 438 1.1× 86 0.5× 41 1.4k
Mutsuyuki Ueta Japan 18 813 0.8× 205 0.3× 275 0.5× 229 0.6× 76 0.5× 50 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Keane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Keane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Keane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Keane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Keane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Keane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Keane. The network helps show where John J. Keane may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John J. Keane

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John J. Keane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John J. Keane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John J. Keane. John J. Keane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Goldberg, Joshua F., M. Zachariah Peery, Gavin M. Jones, et al.. (2025). Bioregional‐scale acoustic monitoring can support fire‐prone forest restoration planning. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 23(7). 4 indexed citations
2.
Wood, Connor M., Gavin M. Jones, H. Anu Kramer, et al.. (2025). Divergent responses of native predators to severe wildfire and biological invasion are mediated by life history. Ecological Applications. 35(7). e70135–e70135. 2 indexed citations
4.
Pauli, Jonathan N., et al.. (2024). Multi-scale forest heterogeneity promotes occupancy of dusky-footed woodrats in the Sierra Nevada. Forest Ecology and Management. 578. 122412–122412. 2 indexed citations
5.
Keane, John J., et al.. (2024). Energetics explain predator occurrence and movement in pyrodiverse landscapes. Landscape Ecology. 39(10). 3 indexed citations
6.
Zuckerberg, Benjamin, Jonathan N. Pauli, William J. Berigan, et al.. (2023). Older forests function as energetic and demographic refugia for a climate-sensitive species. Oecologia. 202(4). 831–844. 8 indexed citations
7.
Pauli, Jonathan N., et al.. (2023). Landscape heterogeneity provides co‐benefits to predator and prey. Ecological Applications. 33(8). e2908–e2908. 11 indexed citations
8.
Jones, Gavin M., H. Anu Kramer, John J. Keane, et al.. (2023). Forest heterogeneity outweighs movement costs by enhancing hunting success and reproductive output in California spotted owls. Landscape Ecology. 38(10). 2655–2673. 9 indexed citations
9.
Wood, Connor M., et al.. (2023). Passive acoustic monitoring indicates Barred Owls are established in northern coastal California and management intervention is warranted. Ornithological applications. 125(3). 5 indexed citations
10.
Wood, Connor M., et al.. (2022). Arresting the spread of invasive species in continental systems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 20(5). 278–284. 20 indexed citations
11.
Fountain, Emily D., Connor M. Wood, Amy K. Wray, et al.. (2022). DNA metabarcoding reveals the threat of rapidly expanding barred owl populations to native wildlife in western North America. Biological Conservation. 273. 109678–109678. 8 indexed citations
12.
Wood, Connor M., Sheila A. Whitmore, William J. Berigan, et al.. (2021). Noisy neighbors and reticent residents: Distinguishing resident from non-resident individuals to improve passive acoustic monitoring. Global Ecology and Conservation. 28. e01710–e01710. 18 indexed citations
13.
Carlson, Peter C., et al.. (2018). Barred owl research needs and prioritization in California. 1 indexed citations
14.
Wood, Connor M., Sheila A. Whitmore, R. J. Gutiérrez, et al.. (2018). Using metapopulation models to assess species conservation–ecosystem restoration trade-offs. Biological Conservation. 224. 248–257. 11 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Gavin M., John J. Keane, R. J. Gutiérrez, & M. Zachariah Peery. (2017). Declining old‐forest species as a legacy of large trees lost. Diversity and Distributions. 24(3). 341–351. 85 indexed citations
16.
Keane, John J.. (2017). Threats to the viability of California spotted owls. 7 indexed citations
17.
Hull, Joshua M., et al.. (2010). Range-wide genetic differentiation among North American great gray owls (Strix nebulosa) reveals a distinct lineage restricted to the Sierra Nevada, California. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 56(1). 212–221. 24 indexed citations
18.
Blakesley, Jennifer A., Mark E. Seamans, Mary M. Conner, et al.. (2010). Population Dynamics of Spotted Owls in the Sierra Nevada, California. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 174(1). 1–36. 43 indexed citations
19.
Ishak, Heather D., John P. Dumbacher, Nancy Anderson, et al.. (2008). Blood Parasites in Owls with Conservation Implications for the Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis). PLoS ONE. 3(5). e2304–e2304. 66 indexed citations
20.
Morrison, Michael L., Linnea S. Hall, John J. Keane, Amy J. Kuenzi, & Jared Verner. (1993). Distribution and abundance of birds in the White Mountains, California. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 53(3). 4. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026