John J. Cox

1.3k total citations
66 papers, 865 citations indexed

About

John J. Cox is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, John J. Cox has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 865 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Ecology, 14 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 13 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in John J. Cox's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (43 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (29 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (11 papers). John J. Cox is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (43 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (29 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (11 papers). John J. Cox collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. John J. Cox's co-authors include David S. Maehr, Jeffery L. Larkin, Philip H. Crowley, Sean M. Murphy, Ben C. Augustine, David C. Bolin, Matthew R. Dzialak, Jennifer R. Adams, Lisette P. Waits and Christopher D. Barton and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

John J. Cox

63 papers receiving 833 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John J. Cox United States	18	631	165	156	112	105	66	865
Javier Calzada Spain	15	623 1.0×	138 0.8×	162 1.0×	110 1.0×	64 0.6×	46	897
Sándor Csányi Hungary	12	552 0.9×	135 0.8×	148 0.9×	83 0.7×	119 1.1×	37	754
Heather A. Whitlaw United States	15	822 1.3×	151 0.9×	152 1.0×	145 1.3×	106 1.0×	38	960
Ernie P. Wiggers United States	13	775 1.2×	173 1.0×	178 1.1×	157 1.4×	137 1.3×	25	985
Dwayne R. Etter United States	18	717 1.1×	202 1.2×	149 1.0×	104 0.9×	66 0.6×	43	899
Mathieu Garel France	16	593 0.9×	169 1.0×	130 0.8×	115 1.0×	62 0.6×	45	748
Marcin Brzeziński Poland	20	743 1.2×	179 1.1×	171 1.1×	106 0.9×	76 0.7×	62	861
Lourens H. Swanepoel South Africa	18	867 1.4×	207 1.3×	160 1.0×	202 1.8×	77 0.7×	64	1.1k
Luca Pedrotti Italy	15	640 1.0×	101 0.6×	142 0.9×	160 1.4×	60 0.6×	52	817
Bivash Pandav India	17	812 1.3×	153 0.9×	206 1.3×	130 1.2×	117 1.1×	60	961

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Cox

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Cox

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Cox. The network helps show where John J. Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John J. Cox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John J. Cox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John J. Cox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John J. Cox. John J. Cox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Barton, Christopher, John J. Cox, Jacquelyn C. Guzy, et al.. (2025). Initial responses of songbird communities to forest reclamation on legacy surface mines. Ecosphere. 16(10).

Poor, Erin E., et al.. (2024). Towards robust corridors: a validation framework to improve corridor modeling. Landscape Ecology. 39(10). 3 indexed citations

Price, Steven J., et al.. (2024). Response of Red-backed Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus)to the Forestry Reclamation Approach on Legacy Surface Mines in the Monongahela National Forest (West Virginia). Ecological Restoration. 42(2). 105–107. 1 indexed citations

Williams, Kathleen E., et al.. (2024). Landscape context and behavioral clustering contribute to flexible habitat selection strategies in a large mammal. Mammal Research. 69(3). 329–343.

McDermott, Joseph, et al.. (2023). Multiscale influences on Elk (Cervus canadensis) calving site selection across a fragmented Appalachian landscape. Journal of Mammalogy. 104(6). 1264–1278. 1 indexed citations

Nemeth, Nicole M., et al.. (2023). Congenital Vertebral Malformation in a Neonatal Elk (Cervus canadensis) in Kentucky, USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 59(3). 532–535. 1 indexed citations

Williams, Kathleen E., et al.. (2022). Using low-fix rate GPS telemetry to expand estimates of ungulate reproductive success. Animal Biotelemetry. 10(1). 5 indexed citations

Cox, John J., et al.. (2020). A spatial genomic approach identifies time lags and historical barriers to gene flow in a rapidly fragmenting Appalachian landscape. Molecular Ecology. 29(4). 673–685. 15 indexed citations

Cox, John J., et al.. (2019). Persistent geophysical effects of mining threaten ridgetop biota of Appalachian forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 17(2). 85–91. 16 indexed citations

10.

Augustine, Ben C., J. Andrew Royle, Sean M. Murphy, et al.. (2019). Spatial capture–recapture for categorically marked populations with an application to genetic capture–recapture. Ecosphere. 10(4). 39 indexed citations

11.

McDermott, Joseph, et al.. (2018). Survival and Cause-Specific Mortality of White-tailed Deer in Southeastern Kentucky. Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 5. 90–96. 3 indexed citations

12.

Murphy, Sean M., et al.. (2017). Consequences of severe habitat fragmentation on density, genetics, and spatial capture-recapture analysis of a small bear population. PLoS ONE. 12(7). e0181849–e0181849. 25 indexed citations

13.

Cox, John J., et al.. (2017). High seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in elk (Cervus canadensis) of the central Appalachians, USA. Parasitology Research. 116(3). 1079–1083. 9 indexed citations

14.

Puckett, Emily E., Erin L. Landguth, Jerrold L. Belant, et al.. (2017). Spatial genetic structure in American black bears (Ursus americanus): female philopatry is variable and related to population history. Heredity. 120(4). 329–341. 11 indexed citations

15.

Crowley, Philip H. & John J. Cox. (2011). Intraguild mutualism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 26(12). 627–633. 30 indexed citations

16.

Fei, Songlin, et al.. (2011). A perfect storm may threaten Florida panther recovery. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 9(6). 317–318. 5 indexed citations

17.

Treanor, John J., Joseph S. Johnson, Rick Wallen, et al.. (2010). Vaccination strategies for managing brucellosis in Yellowstone bison. Vaccine. 28. F64–F72. 25 indexed citations

18.

Larkin, Jeffery L., et al.. (2008). Small Mammal Response to Vegetation and Spoil Conditions on a Reclaimed Surface Mine in Eastern Kentucky. Southeastern Naturalist. 7(3). 401–412. 26 indexed citations

19.

Maehr, David S., et al.. (2005). Activity and Movements of Reintroduced Elk in Southeastern Kentucky. Southeastern Naturalist. 4(2). 365–374. 18 indexed citations

20.

Larkin, Jeffery L., et al.. (2003). Demographic Characteristics of a Reintroduced Elk Population in Kentucky. Journal of Wildlife Management. 67(3). 467–467. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact