John H. Mills

4.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
70 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

John H. Mills is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, John H. Mills has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 38 papers in Sensory Systems and 37 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in John H. Mills's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (40 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (38 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (37 papers). John H. Mills is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (40 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (38 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (37 papers). John H. Mills collaborates with scholars based in United States. John H. Mills's co-authors include George A. Gates, Judy R. Dubno, Ning-ji He, Richard A. Schmiedt, Lois J. Matthews, Fu‐Shing Lee, Flint A. Boettcher, Warren Y. Adkins, Jayne B. Ahlstrom and R. M. Gilbert and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Environmental Health Perspectives and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

John H. Mills

67 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Presbycusis

2005 868 citations George A. Gates, John H. Mills The Lancet profile →

Peers

John H. Mills

CN

SS

SH

NEURO

ECP

Ramesh Rajan Australia

Russell L. Snyder United States

Robert Patuzzi Australia

Joseph P. Walton United States

Guido F. Smoorenburg Netherlands

E. F. Evans United Kingdom

A. R. D. Thornton United Kingdom

Eric Javel United States

Jonathan H. Siegel United States

Hillel Pratt Israel

Ramesh Rajan Australia

John H. Mills

2.6k ×1.2

CN

1.8k ×0.9

SS

519 ×0.4

SH

584 ×1.2

NEURO

319 ×1.2

ECP

Citations per year, relative to John H. Mills John H. Mills (= 1×) peers Ramesh Rajan

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Mills

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Mills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Mills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Mills more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Mills

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Mills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Mills. The network helps show where John H. Mills may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Mills

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Mills. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Mills based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Mills. John H. Mills is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Harris, Kelly C., John H. Mills, Ning-ji He, & Judy R. Dubno. (2008). Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials. Hearing Research. 243(1-2). 47–56. 49 indexed citations

2.

Harris, Kelly C., John H. Mills, & Judy R. Dubno. (2007). Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults. Hearing Research. 228(1-2). 58–68. 55 indexed citations

3.

Lee, Fu‐Shing, Lois J. Matthews, Judy R. Dubno, & John H. Mills. (2005). Longitudinal Study of Pure-Tone Thresholds in Older Persons. Ear and Hearing. 26(1). 1–11. 203 indexed citations

4.

Gates, George A. & John H. Mills. (2005). Presbycusis. The Lancet. 366(9491). 1111–1120. 868 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Boettcher, Flint A., et al.. (2001). The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hearing Research. 153(1-2). 32–42. 54 indexed citations

6.

Boettcher, Flint A., et al.. (2001). Auditory brainstem responses in younger and older adults for broadband noises separated by a silent gap. Hearing Research. 161(1-2). 81–86. 38 indexed citations

7.

Mills, John H., et al.. (1999). Gender‐Specific Effects of Drugs on Hearing Levels of Older Persons. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 884(1). 381–388. 18 indexed citations

8.

Lee, Fu‐Shing, Lois J. Matthews, John H. Mills, Judy R. Dubno, & Warren Y. Adkins. (1998). Analysis of Blood Chemistry and Hearing Levels in a Sample of Older Persons. Ear and Hearing. 19(3). 180–190. 22 indexed citations

9.

Boettcher, Flint A., et al.. (1995). Age-related changes in auditory evoked potentials of gerbils. III. Low-frequency responses and repetition rate effects. Hearing Research. 87(1-2). 208–219. 9 indexed citations

10.

Boettcher, Flint A., John H. Mills, Judy R. Dubno, & Richard A. Schmiedt. (1995). Masking of auditory brainstem responses in young and aged gerbils. Hearing Research. 89(1-2). 1–13. 13 indexed citations

11.

Boettcher, Flint A., et al.. (1995). Masking and aging: I. Gerbil auditory brain-stem response thresholds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 97(5_Supplement). 3281–3281.

12.

Smith, D.I. & John H. Mills. (1991). Low-frequency component of the gerbil brainstem response: Response characteristics and anesthesia effects. Hearing Research. 54(1). 1–10. 11 indexed citations

13.

Smith, D.I., John H. Mills, & Richard A. Schmiedt. (1990). Frequency selectivity of the middle latency response. Hearing Research. 43(2-3). 95–105. 7 indexed citations

14.

Matthews, Luke J., et al.. (1990). Audiometric and Subjective Assessment of Hearing Handicap. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 116(11). 1325–1330. 23 indexed citations

15.

Schmiedt, Richard A., John H. Mills, & Joe C. Adams. (1990). Tuning and suppression in auditory nerve fibers of aged gerbils raised in quiet or noise. Hearing Research. 45(3). 221–236. 75 indexed citations

16.

Smith, D.I. & John H. Mills. (1989). Anesthesia effects: auditory brain-stem response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 72(5). 422–428. 39 indexed citations

17.

Dolan, Thomas G. & John H. Mills. (1989). Recoveries of whole-nerve AP thresholds, amplitudes and tuning curves in gerbils following noise exposure. Hearing Research. 37(3). 193–201. 9 indexed citations

18.

Mills, John H., et al.. (1982). Review of environmental factors affecting hearing.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 44. 119–127. 29 indexed citations

19.

Mills, John H., Warren Y. Adkins, & R. M. Gilbert. (1978). High‐Frequency Hearing Losses Caused by Low‐Frequency Noises. Otolaryngology. 86(5). ORL–821. 3 indexed citations

20.

Bohne, Barbara A., Donald H. Eldredge, & John H. Mills. (1973). Cochlear Potentials and Electron Microscopy Applied to the Study of Small Cochlear Lesions. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology. 82(4). 595–608. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact