John G. New

1.6k total citations
37 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

John G. New is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Aquatic Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John G. New has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 17 papers in Ecology and 5 papers in Aquatic Science. Recurrent topics in John G. New's work include Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (19 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (17 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (14 papers). John G. New is often cited by papers focused on Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (19 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (17 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (14 papers). John G. New collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. John G. New's co-authors include Philip H. Kass, Janet M. Scarlett, Μ. D. Salman, Rebecca Ruch-Gallie, Suzanne Hetts, David Bodznick, Timothy C. Tricas, R. Glenn Northcutt, Sheryl Coombs and Michael Hofmann and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

John G. New

35 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John G. New United States 19 556 394 318 266 217 37 1.2k
Arthur E. Dunham United States 12 389 0.7× 192 0.5× 372 1.2× 194 0.7× 25 0.1× 22 1.0k
Betty McGuire United States 24 290 0.5× 172 0.4× 857 2.7× 131 0.5× 14 0.1× 78 1.9k
Matthew Sullivan United Kingdom 22 170 0.3× 151 0.4× 448 1.4× 102 0.4× 10 0.0× 50 1.4k
Elke Schüttler Chile 12 255 0.5× 79 0.2× 364 1.1× 32 0.1× 47 0.2× 25 712
O. Anne E. Rasa Germany 19 333 0.6× 71 0.2× 522 1.6× 148 0.6× 7 0.0× 50 1.2k
Lina S. V. Roth Sweden 14 354 0.6× 16 0.0× 31 0.1× 180 0.7× 44 0.2× 25 656
Rosemary Strasser United States 14 189 0.3× 10 0.0× 149 0.5× 99 0.4× 27 0.1× 25 580
Edward O. Minot New Zealand 21 366 0.7× 224 0.6× 1.0k 3.2× 322 1.2× 22 0.1× 57 1.5k
Paul Leyhausen Germany 10 181 0.3× 29 0.1× 239 0.8× 104 0.4× 12 0.1× 28 754
Adam A. Pack United States 32 345 0.6× 133 0.3× 1.7k 5.5× 109 0.4× 14 0.1× 79 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by John G. New

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. New's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. New with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. New more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. New

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. New. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. New. The network helps show where John G. New may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John G. New

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John G. New. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John G. New based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John G. New. John G. New is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
New, John G.. (2008). If You Could Read My Mind. Journal of Legal Medicine. 29(2). 179–198. 4 indexed citations
2.
New, John G.. (2007). Patently Wrong: The U.S. Supreme Court Punts in the Case of LabCorp v. Metabolite. 10(1). 147.
3.
New, John G.. (2006). Aren't You Lucky You Have Two Mamas: Redefining Parenthood in Light of Evolving Reproductive Technologies and Social Change. Chicago-Kent law review. 81(2). 773. 4 indexed citations
4.
Scarlett, Janet M., Μ. D. Salman, John G. New, & Philip H. Kass. (2002). The role of veterinary practitioners in reducing dog and cat relinquishments and euthanasias. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 220(3). 306–311. 79 indexed citations
5.
Coombs, Sheryl, John G. New, & Mark Nelson. (2002). Information-processing demands in electrosensory and mechanosensory lateral line systems. Journal of Physiology-Paris. 96(5-6). 341–354. 25 indexed citations
6.
New, John G.. (2002). Multimodal Integration in the Feeding Behaviors of Predatory Teleost Fishes. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 59(4). 177–189. 40 indexed citations
7.
New, John G., et al.. (2001). Strike feeding behavior in the muskellunge, Esox masquinongy: contributions of the lateral line and visual sensory systems. Journal of Experimental Biology. 204(6). 1207–1221. 76 indexed citations
8.
Scarlett, Janet M., Μ. D. Salman, John G. New, & Philip H. Kass. (1999). Reasons for Relinquishment of Companion Animals in U.S. Animal Shelters: Selected Health and Personal Issues. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 2(1). 41–57. 151 indexed citations
9.
Salman, Μ. D., John G. New, Janet M. Scarlett, et al.. (1998). Human and Animal Factors Related to Relinquishment of Dogs and Cats in 12 Selected Animal Shelters in the United States. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 1(3). 207–226. 322 indexed citations
10.
New, John G., et al.. (1998). Descending neural projections to the spinal cord in the channel catfish,Ictalurus Punctatus. The Anatomical Record. 252(2). 235–253. 13 indexed citations
11.
New, John G., et al.. (1998). Afferent and Efferent Connections of Nucleus praeeminentialis in the Channel Catfish: A Reevaluation. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 51(4). 202–214. 7 indexed citations
12.
Tricas, Timothy C. & John G. New. (1997). Sensitivity and response dynamics of elasmobranch electrosensory primary afferent neurons to near threshold fields. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 182(1). 89–101. 47 indexed citations
13.
New, John G.. (1997). The Evolution of Vertebrate Electrosensory Systems. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 50(4). 244–252. 35 indexed citations
14.
New, John G., et al.. (1996). Cytoarchitecture of the medial octavolateralis nucleus in the goldfish,Carassius auratus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 366(3). 534–546. 33 indexed citations
15.
New, John G.. (1994). Electric Organ Discharge and Electrosensory Reafference in Skates. Biological Bulletin. 187(1). 64–75. 11 indexed citations
16.
New, John G., et al.. (1994). Central Topography of Anterior Lateral Line Nerve Projections in the Channel Catfish, <i>Ictalurus punctatus</i>. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 43(1). 34–50. 20 indexed citations
17.
New, John G., et al.. (1989). Multivariate analysis of the hybrid Phoxinus eos × Phoxinus neogaeus (Pisces: Cyprinidae): reevaluation of univariate analysis. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 67(7). 1637–1641. 1 indexed citations
18.
New, John G.. (1981). Central projections of the lateralis nerves in the shovelnose sturgeon, Scaphirhynchus platorynchus. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 1 indexed citations
19.
New, John G.. (1959). Additional Uses of Dyes for Studying the Movements of Small Mammals. Journal of Wildlife Management. 23(3). 348–348. 4 indexed citations
20.
New, John G., et al.. (1957). Possible Natural Intergradation between Prairie and Forest Deer Mice. Journal of Mammalogy. 38(2). 210–210. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026