John F. Mull

488 total citations
10 papers, 407 citations indexed

About

John F. Mull is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, John F. Mull has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 407 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 6 papers in Genetics and 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in John F. Mull's work include Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). John F. Mull is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). John F. Mull collaborates with scholars based in United States, U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. John F. Mull's co-authors include James A. MacMahon, Thomas O. Crist, Vincent J. Tepedino, Nora Bynum, Terry Griswold, Eleanor J. Sterling, John F. Cavitt, Timothy Leslie, Donna W. Vogler and Ana Luz Porzecanski and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Journal of Arid Environments and Ecosphere.

In The Last Decade

John F. Mull

10 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John F. Mull United States 7 260 234 181 117 66 10 407
Sarah E. Wittman United States 9 280 1.1× 216 0.9× 149 0.8× 117 1.0× 74 1.1× 11 415
Alan N Costa Brazil 9 323 1.2× 289 1.2× 161 0.9× 91 0.8× 50 0.8× 15 443
Rodrigo G. Pol Argentina 12 247 0.9× 219 0.9× 108 0.6× 80 0.7× 53 0.8× 24 338
Elizabeth Braker United States 10 185 0.7× 59 0.3× 183 1.0× 145 1.2× 72 1.1× 21 392
Gabriela I. Pirk Argentina 13 364 1.4× 333 1.4× 151 0.8× 76 0.6× 78 1.2× 33 476
Jonas Maravalhas Brazil 9 236 0.9× 209 0.9× 154 0.9× 81 0.7× 49 0.7× 15 352
John Vandermeer United States 5 210 0.8× 153 0.7× 153 0.8× 147 1.3× 63 1.0× 5 424
Gabriela Castaño‐Meneses Mexico 13 329 1.3× 197 0.8× 92 0.5× 98 0.8× 50 0.8× 72 477
Cláudio Ruy Vasconcelos da Fonseca Brazil 13 204 0.8× 76 0.3× 144 0.8× 138 1.2× 57 0.9× 60 379
Sébastien Lacau Brazil 9 269 1.0× 241 1.0× 77 0.4× 59 0.5× 34 0.5× 27 410

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Mull

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Mull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Mull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Mull more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Mull

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Mull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Mull. The network helps show where John F. Mull may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Mull

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Mull. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Mull based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Mull. John F. Mull is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Hoagstrom, Christopher W., et al.. (2019). A Quantitative Simulation of Coevolution with Mutation Using Playing Cards. The American Biology Teacher. 81(2). 127–132. 2 indexed citations
2.
Porzecanski, Ana Luz, Eleanor J. Sterling, Nora Bynum, et al.. (2016). Teaching for higher levels of thinking: developing quantitative and analytical skills in environmental science courses. Ecosphere. 7(4). 37 indexed citations
3.
Tepedino, Vincent J., et al.. (2014). Reproduction and Pollination of the Endangered Dwarf Bear-PoppyArctomecon humilis(Papaveraceae) across a Quarter Century: Unraveling of a Pollination Web?. Western North American Naturalist. 74(3). 311–324. 13 indexed citations
4.
Davenport, Stephen, John F. Mull, & Christopher W. Hoagstrom. (2013). Consumption of a Dangerous Ant (Camponotus vicinus) by a Threatened Minnow (Notropis simus pecosensis). The Southwestern Naturalist. 58(1). 126–128. 3 indexed citations
5.
Mull, John F., et al.. (2009). Relationship between Cheatgrass Coverage and the Relative Abundance of Snakes on Antelope Island, Utah. Western North American Naturalist. 69(1). 88–95. 9 indexed citations
7.
Mull, John F.. (2003). Dispersal of sagebrush-steppe seeds by the western harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex occidentalis).. Western North American Naturalist. 63(3). 358–362. 13 indexed citations
8.
MacMahon, James A., John F. Mull, & Thomas O. Crist. (2000). Harvester Ants (Pogonomyrmexspp.): Their Community and Ecosystem Influences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 31(1). 265–291. 246 indexed citations
9.
Mull, John F. & James A. MacMahon. (1997). Spatial Variation in Rates of Seed Removal by Harvester Ants (Pogonomyrmex occidentalis) in a Shrub-steppe Ecosystem. The American Midland Naturalist. 138(1). 1–1. 32 indexed citations
10.
Mull, John F.. (1996). Factors determining the spatial variability of seed densities in a shrub-steppe ecosystem: the role of harvester ants. Journal of Arid Environments. 32(2). 181–192. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026