John F. Chamblee

727 total citations
8 papers, 137 citations indexed

About

John F. Chamblee is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Paleontology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, John F. Chamblee has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 137 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 2 papers in Paleontology and 2 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in John F. Chamblee's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers). John F. Chamblee is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers). John F. Chamblee collaborates with scholars based in United States. John F. Chamblee's co-authors include Carolyn A. Dehring, Craig A. Depken, C. Rhett Jackson, Peter F. Colwell, David S. Leigh, David J. Hally, Stephen A. Kowalewski, Charlotte A. Smith, Verenice Y. Heredia Espinoza and Thomas J. Pluckhahn and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology and Society, Land Economics and American Antiquity.

In The Last Decade

John F. Chamblee

7 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John F. Chamblee United States	7	46	35	35	22	21	8	137
Michael Aston United Kingdom	9	108 2.3×	21 0.6×	14 0.4×	20 0.9×	2 0.1×	19	262
Gregory T. Cushman United States	4	8 0.2×	11 0.3×	24 0.7×	26 1.2×	2 0.1×	10	144
David Harry Miller United States	6	8 0.2×	8 0.2×	20 0.6×	15 0.7×	2 0.1×	19	159
Pastor Fábrega‐Álvarez Spain	9	103 2.2×	5 0.1×	19 0.5×	29 1.3×	8 0.4×	38	303
Adrian S. Z. Chase United States	9	95 2.1×	7 0.2×	6 0.2×	5 0.2×	20 1.0×	21	189
Della Hooke United Kingdom	10	53 1.2×	18 0.5×	8 0.2×	8 0.4×	2 0.1×	40	288
Steven P. Ashby United Kingdom	10	137 3.0×	7 0.2×	17 0.5×	27 1.2×		25	278
Benjamin Keenan Canada	7	22 0.5×	7 0.2×	16 0.5×	35 1.6×	1 0.0×	13	130
Franz Mauelshagen Germany	8	18 0.4×	13 0.4×	101 2.9×	9 0.4×		23	237
Katrin Kleemann Switzerland	4	64 1.4×	8 0.2×	68 1.9×	13 0.6×		7	225

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Chamblee

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Chamblee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Chamblee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Chamblee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Chamblee

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Chamblee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Chamblee. The network helps show where John F. Chamblee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Chamblee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Chamblee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Chamblee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Chamblee. John F. Chamblee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Hally, David J. & John F. Chamblee. (2019). The Temporal Distribution and Duration of Mississippian Polities in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and Tennessee. American Antiquity. 84(3). 420–437. 10 indexed citations

2.

Conroy, Michael J., et al.. (2015). Using structured decision making with landowners to address private forest management and parcelization: balancing multiple objectives and incorporating uncertainty. Ecology and Society. 20(4). 14 indexed citations

3.

Chamblee, John F., et al.. (2015). Water Contamination, Land Prices, and the Statute of Repose. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 51(3). 398–414.

4.

Jackson, C. Rhett, et al.. (2014). Herbaceous Versus Forested Riparian Vegetation: Narrow and Simple Versus Wide, Woody and Diverse Stream Habitat. River Research and Applications. 31(7). 847–857. 26 indexed citations

5.

Chamblee, John F., Peter F. Colwell, Carolyn A. Dehring, & Craig A. Depken. (2011). The Effect of Conservation Activity on Surrounding Land Prices. Land Economics. 87(3). 453–472. 26 indexed citations

6.

Chamblee, John F., Carolyn A. Dehring, & Craig A. Depken. (2008). Watershed development restrictions and land prices: Empirical evidence from southern Appalachia. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 39(3). 287–296. 12 indexed citations

7.

Balkansky, Andrew K., Stephen A. Kowalewski, Thomas J. Pluckhahn, et al.. (2000). Archaeological Survey in the Mixteca Alta of Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology. 27(4). 365–365. 13 indexed citations

8.

Balkansky, Andrew K., Stephen A. Kowalewski, Thomas J. Pluckhahn, et al.. (2000). Archaeological Survey in the Mixteca Alta of Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology. 27(4). 365–389. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact