Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Skandalakis
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Skandalakis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Skandalakis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Skandalakis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Skandalakis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Skandalakis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Skandalakis. The network helps show where John E. Skandalakis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. Skandalakis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. Skandalakis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. Skandalakis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John E. Skandalakis. John E. Skandalakis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Skandalakis, John E., Lee J. Skandalakis, & Panagiotis Skandalakis. (2007). Anatomy of the Lymphatics. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. 16(1). 1–16.87 indexed citations
5.
Skandalakis, John E.. (2004). Plagiarism. Archives of Surgery. 139(9). 1022–1022.12 indexed citations
6.
Skandalakis, John E., et al.. (2004). Hepatic surgical anatomy. Surgical Clinics of North America. 84(2). 413–435.64 indexed citations
Skandalakis, John E., Lee J. Skandalakis, & Gene L. Colborn. (1996). Testicular atrophy and neuropathy in herniorrhaphy.. PubMed. 62(9). 775–82.16 indexed citations
10.
Skandalakis, John E. & Stephen W. Gray. (1994). Embryology for surgeons : the embryological basis for the treatment of con genital anomalies. Williams & Wilkins eBooks.55 indexed citations
Skandalakis, Panagiotis, et al.. (1993). The Surgical Anatomy of the Spleen. Surgical Clinics of North America. 73(4). 747–768.42 indexed citations
13.
Skandalakis, Lee J., Philip E. Donahue, & John E. Skandalakis. (1993). The Vagus Nerve and its Vagaries. Surgical Clinics of North America. 73(4). 769–784.13 indexed citations
14.
Skandalakis, John E., et al.. (1992). John Hunter (1728–1793). Clinical Cardiology. 15(2). 134–135.
15.
Lumsden, Alan B., et al.. (1990). Splenic artery aneurysms. 7(1). 113–121.5 indexed citations
16.
Gray, Stephen W., et al.. (1985). Atlas of surgical anatomy for general surgeons. Williams & Wilkins eBooks.9 indexed citations
17.
Gray, Stephen W., et al.. (1980). STRANGULATED OBTURATOR HERNIA. The Medical Journal of Australia. 1(6). 280–280.101 indexed citations
18.
Gray, Stephen W. & John E. Skandalakis. (1972). Embryology for surgeons : the embryological basis for the treatment of congenital defects. Saunders eBooks.103 indexed citations
19.
Skandalakis, John E.. (1962). Smooth muscle tumors of the alimentary tract : leiomyomas and leiosarcomas, a review of 2525 cases. Thomas eBooks.5 indexed citations
20.
Gray, Stephen W., et al.. (1958). Empyema in children. The Journal of Pediatrics. 53(6). 719–725.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.