John E. Schiel

1.8k citations
46 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 23

John E. Schiel

46 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

John E. Schiel
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Spectroscopy 362
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 456
  • Molecular Biology 977
  • Oncology 135
  • Biomedical Engineering 204
Replace Guodong Chen with:
Guodong Chen United States
Rob Haselberg Netherlands
Christopher J. Hipolito Japan
Michael T. Boyne United States
Konrad Bleicher Switzerland
Salman Muzammil United States
Gregory C. Adam United States
David L. Springer United States
Simone Nicolardi Netherlands
Lendell L. Cummins United States
John E. Schiel relative to Guodong Chen United States Guodong Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Guodong Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Schiel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Schiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Schiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Schiel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Schiel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Schiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Schiel. The network helps show where John E. Schiel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Schiel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Schiel Line = papers co-authored together John E. Schiel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20223
3 20229
4 20224
5 201911
6 20183
7 2018104
8 201831
9 201827
10
NIST Spectroscopic Measurement Standards.
20184
11 201768
12 20159
13 201217
14 201222
15 201113
16 20114
17 201033
18 201047
19
Non-Competitive Peak Decay Analysis Of Drugprotein\nDissociation By High-Performance Affinity\nChromatography
200942
20 200954

About John E. Schiel

John E. Schiel is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein purification and stability (26 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (21 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (10 papers), Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (8 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (6 papers) and Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (362 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (456 citations) and Molecular Biology (977 citations). John E. Schiel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Nepal and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David S. Hage, K.S. Joseph, Michelle Ji Yeon Yoo, Annette C. Moser, Luke W. Arbogast, John P. Marino, Frank Delaglio, Rangan Mallik, Sony Soman and Karen W. Phinney. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Separation Science, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Journal of Mass Spectrometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026