John E. Reaugh

30 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

John E. Reaugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Mechanics of Materials 590
  • Geophysics 245
  • Materials Chemistry 484
  • Aerospace Engineering 195
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 45
Replace Mark Elert with:
Mark Elert United States
H. Keo Springer United States
Davis Tonks United States
F. Zhang Canada
Cole Yarrington United States
Dennis L. Paisley United States
J. R. Asay United States
J.F. Thomas Belgium
Chengda Dai China
K. Baumung Germany
John E. Reaugh relative to Mark Elert United States Mark Elert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Mark Elert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Reaugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Reaugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Reaugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Reaugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Reaugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Reaugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Reaugh. The network helps show where John E. Reaugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Reaugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Reaugh Line = papers co-authored together John E. Reaugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015162
2 2009132
3 1978111
4 201885
5 200735
6 199933
7 200425
8 200325
9 201419
10 198717
11 201812
12 20129
13
Computer simulations of ballistic experiments
19878
14 20127
15 20126
16 20046
17 20175
18 20214
19 19973
20
ISOCHORIC BURN, AN INTERNALLY CONSISTENT METHOD FOR THE REACTANT TO PRODUCT TRANSFORMATION IN REACTIVE FLOW
20022

About John E. Reaugh

John E. Reaugh is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering, Geophysics and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 718 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Energetic Materials and Combustion (23 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (16 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (15 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (3 papers), Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (3 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (2 papers) and Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanics of Materials (590 citations), Geophysics (245 citations), Materials Chemistry (484 citations), Aerospace Engineering (195 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (45 citations). John E. Reaugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nathan R. Barton, N. W. Winter, Laurence E. Fried, Ryan Austin, D.M. Norris, Brian J. Moran, H. Keo Springer, Sorin Bastea, Craig M. Tarver and Albert L. Nichols. Their work appears in journals such as Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics, Journal of Applied Physics, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering and Physical Review B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact