John E. McDermott

626 total citations
9 papers, 459 citations indexed

About

John E. McDermott is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, John E. McDermott has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 459 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 6 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in John E. McDermott's work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (7 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (5 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (5 papers). John E. McDermott is often cited by papers focused on Foot and Ankle Surgery (7 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (5 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (5 papers). John E. McDermott collaborates with scholars based in United States. John E. McDermott's co-authors include Pierce E. Scranton, James V. Rogers and Frederick G. Lippert and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Foot & Ankle International and Foot & Ankle.

In The Last Decade

John E. McDermott

9 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John E. McDermott United States	8	436	193	113	78	39	9	459
Keith S. Feder United States	7	446 1.0×	195 1.0×	121 1.1×	72 0.9×	31 0.8×	9	470
Warren S. Taranow United States	6	326 0.7×	135 0.7×	85 0.8×	36 0.5×	64 1.6×	7	338
Gian Luigi Canata Italy	9	365 0.8×	154 0.8×	192 1.7×	50 0.6×	32 0.8×	21	451
W. Hodges Davis United States	7	373 0.9×	92 0.5×	218 1.9×	50 0.6×	28 0.7×	16	409
Jin-Soo Suh South Korea	9	401 0.9×	140 0.7×	210 1.9×	37 0.5×	76 1.9×	13	433
David Prieskorn United States	8	394 0.9×	235 1.2×	150 1.3×	39 0.5×	39 1.0×	11	444
Shigeharu Nomura Japan	4	359 0.8×	141 0.7×	141 1.2×	57 0.7×	21 0.5×	11	405
Kwok Bill Chan Hong Kong	14	442 1.0×	100 0.5×	224 2.0×	64 0.8×	75 1.9×	25	474
Marcelo Pires Prado Brazil	13	385 0.9×	187 1.0×	137 1.2×	48 0.6×	21 0.5×	48	425
Kunihiko Kadono Japan	8	292 0.7×	172 0.9×	89 0.8×	28 0.4×	25 0.6×	10	329

Countries citing papers authored by John E. McDermott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. McDermott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. McDermott. The network helps show where John E. McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. McDermott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. McDermott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. McDermott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John E. McDermott. John E. McDermott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Scranton, Pierce E., et al.. (2005). Bone Suture Anchor Fixation in the Lower Extremity: A Review of Insertion Principles and a Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation. Foot & Ankle International. 26(7). 516–519. 8 indexed citations

2.

McDermott, John E.. (2004). What’s new in orthopaedic surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 199(6). 924–931. 2 indexed citations

3.

McDermott, John E., Pierce E. Scranton, & James V. Rogers. (2004). Variations in Fibular Position, Talar Length, and Anterior Talofibular Ligament Length. Foot & Ankle International. 25(9). 625–629. 25 indexed citations

4.

Scranton, Pierce E. & John E. McDermott. (2001). Treatment of Type V Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus with Ipsilateral Knee Osteochondral Autografts. Foot & Ankle International. 22(5). 380–384. 111 indexed citations

5.

Scranton, Pierce E., John E. McDermott, & James V. Rogers. (2000). The Relationship between Chronic Ankle Instability and Variations in Mortise Anatomy and Impingement Spurs. Foot & Ankle International. 21(8). 657–664. 98 indexed citations

6.

Scranton, Pierce E. & John E. McDermott. (1997). Pathologic Anatomic Variations in Subtalar Anatomy. Foot & Ankle International. 18(8). 471–476. 10 indexed citations

7.

Scranton, Pierce E. & John E. McDermott. (1995). Prognostic Factors in Bunion Surgery. Foot & Ankle International. 16(11). 698–704. 30 indexed citations

8.

Scranton, Pierce E. & John E. McDermott. (1992). Anterior Tibiotalar Spurs: A Comparison of Open versus Arthroscopic Debridement. Foot & Ankle. 13(3). 125–129. 143 indexed citations

9.

Lippert, Frederick G. & John E. McDermott. (1991). Crescentic Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus: A Biomechanical Study of Variables Affecting the Final Position of the First Metatarsal. Foot & Ankle. 11(4). 204–207. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact