John E. Lane

1.3k citations
60 papers · 990 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Lane

55 papers receiving 932 citations

Peers

John E. Lane
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Atmospheric Science 353
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 219
  • Global and Planetary Change 255
  • Environmental Engineering 109
  • Ocean Engineering 109
Replace Oleg Zikanov with:
Oleg Zikanov United States
Björn Hof Austria
Stefan G. Llewellyn Smith United States
Florian Huhn Spain
Zhenxing Liu China
J. S. Marshall United Kingdom
Marc Avila Germany
Masato Furuya Japan
Adrian Doicu Germany
P. A. Davidson United Kingdom
John E. Lane relative to Oleg Zikanov United States Oleg Zikanov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Oleg Zikanov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Lane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Lane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Lane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Lane. The network helps show where John E. Lane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Lane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Lane Line = papers co-authored together John E. Lane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009332
2
Simple Analytic Expressions for the Magnetic Field of a Circular Current Loop
200191
3 201190
4 197979
5 201157
6 200847
7 199723
8 200021
9 200420
10 200819
11 199417
12 201317
13 201217
14 197813
15 199013
16 199311
17
A Review of Discrete Element Method (DEM) Particle Shapes and Size Distributions for Lunar Soil
20109
18 20039
19 20079
20 20098

About John E. Lane

John E. Lane is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Aerospace Engineering, Global and Planetary Change and Computational Mechanics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 990 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Planetary Science and Exploration (18 papers), Precipitation Measurement and Analysis (17 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (16 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (6 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (5 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (5 papers) and Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (353 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (219 citations), Global and Planetary Change (255 citations), Environmental Engineering (109 citations) and Ocean Engineering (109 citations). John E. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cyprus and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip T. Metzger, Takis Kasparis, Silas Michaelides, Christopher Immer, Péter Bauer, Emmanouil N. Anagnostou, Vincenzo Levizzani, Thomas H. Spurling, Jacob Smith and Robert C. Youngquist. Their work appears in journals such as Particulate Science And Technology, Acta Astronautica, Atmospheric Research, Computer Music Journal and Weather and Forecasting.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact