John E. Kiat

416 total citations
31 papers, 272 citations indexed

About

John E. Kiat is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, John E. Kiat has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 272 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in John E. Kiat's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers). John E. Kiat is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers). John E. Kiat collaborates with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Australia. John E. Kiat's co-authors include Jacob E. Cheadle, Robert F. Belli, Steven J. Luck, Bridget J. Goosby, John M. Henderson, Anne R. Schutte, Taylor R. Hayes, Julia Torquati, Winnie Chua and Albert K. Liau and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

John E. Kiat

26 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John E. Kiat United States 12 140 66 49 27 25 31 272
Joann Lianekhammy United States 9 149 1.1× 40 0.6× 94 1.9× 32 1.2× 11 0.4× 17 334
Magdalena Ewa Król Poland 10 163 1.2× 34 0.5× 61 1.2× 16 0.6× 13 0.5× 31 288
Martina Montalti Italy 8 128 0.9× 63 1.0× 95 1.9× 21 0.8× 6 0.2× 13 234
Clayton Peterson Canada 11 119 0.8× 71 1.1× 15 0.3× 28 1.0× 10 0.4× 29 328
Axel Zinkernagel Germany 7 51 0.4× 42 0.6× 32 0.7× 76 2.8× 22 0.9× 11 191
Kilian Semmelmann Germany 5 119 0.8× 35 0.5× 70 1.4× 18 0.7× 18 0.7× 8 265
Kathleen W. Smith Canada 8 171 1.2× 60 0.9× 113 2.3× 14 0.5× 9 0.4× 10 282
Yury Shevchenko Germany 8 85 0.6× 42 0.6× 69 1.4× 28 1.0× 48 1.9× 25 227
Lucy L. M. Patston New Zealand 9 233 1.7× 66 1.0× 125 2.6× 23 0.9× 6 0.2× 10 351
Eka Roivainen Finland 10 72 0.5× 39 0.6× 135 2.8× 50 1.9× 8 0.3× 25 314

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Kiat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Kiat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Kiat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Kiat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Kiat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Kiat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Kiat. The network helps show where John E. Kiat may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. Kiat

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. Kiat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. Kiat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John E. Kiat. John E. Kiat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kiat, John E., et al.. (2025). Enhanced Working Memory Representations for Rare Events. Psychophysiology. 62(3). e70038–e70038.
2.
Kiat, John E., et al.. (2025). Combined conceptual and perceptual control of visual attention in search for real-world objects. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 88(2). 59–59.
3.
Zhang, Guanghui, et al.. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of artifact correction and rejection in event‐related potential research. Psychophysiology. 61(5). e14511–e14511. 11 indexed citations
4.
Luck, Steven J. & John E. Kiat. (2024). Visual working memory for natural scenes: challenges and opportunities. Cognitive Processing. 25(S1). 73–78.
5.
Kiat, John E., et al.. (2024). The predictive ability of GBVS feature channels on infants’ fixations of natural scenes. Visual Cognition. 32(7). 586–604.
6.
Kiat, John E., et al.. (2023). Is covert attention necessary for programming accurate saccades? Evidence from saccade-locked event-related potentials. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 87(1). 172–190. 2 indexed citations
7.
Erickson, Molly, et al.. (2021). Neural basis of the visual working memory deficit in schizophrenia: Merging evidence from fMRI and EEG. Schizophrenia Research. 236. 61–68. 6 indexed citations
8.
Kiat, John E., Taylor R. Hayes, John M. Henderson, & Steven J. Luck. (2021). Rapid Extraction of the Spatial Distribution of Physical Saliency and Semantic Informativeness from Natural Scenes in the Human Brain. Journal of Neuroscience. 42(1). 97–108. 17 indexed citations
10.
Hahn, Britta, Benjamin M. Robinson, John E. Kiat, et al.. (2021). Impaired Filtering and Hyperfocusing: Neural Evidence for Distinct Selective Attention Abnormalities in People with Schizophrenia. Cerebral Cortex. 32(9). 1950–1964. 9 indexed citations
11.
Kashima, Yoshihisa, et al.. (2019). Transmission of disorder and etiological information: Effects on health knowledge recollection and health-related cognition. PLoS ONE. 14(6). e0218703–e0218703. 3 indexed citations
12.
Kiat, John E., Michael D. Dodd, Robert F. Belli, & Jacob E. Cheadle. (2018). The signature of undetected change: an exploratory electrotomographic investigation of gradual change blindness. Journal of Neurophysiology. 119(5). 1629–1635. 3 indexed citations
13.
Kiat, John E.. (2018). Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 129. 58–66. 5 indexed citations
14.
Kiat, John E. & Robert F. Belli. (2017). An exploratory high-density EEG investigation of the misinformation effect: Attentional and recollective differences between true and false perceptual memories. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 141. 199–208. 11 indexed citations
15.
Kiat, John E. & Jacob E. Cheadle. (2017). The impact of individuation on the bases of human empathic responding. NeuroImage. 155. 312–321. 9 indexed citations
16.
Torquati, Julia, Anne R. Schutte, & John E. Kiat. (2017). Attentional Demands of Executive Function Tasks in Indoor and Outdoor Settings: Behavioral and Neuroelectrical Evidence. Children Youth and Environments. 27(2). 70–70. 7 indexed citations
17.
Kiat, John E., et al.. (2017). The influence of distractor strength and response order on MCQ responding. Educational Psychology. 38(3). 368–380. 8 indexed citations
18.
Kiat, John E., et al.. (2015). Escalating risk and the moderating effect of resistance to peer influence on the P200 and feedback-related negativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 11(3). 377–386. 35 indexed citations
19.
Kiat, John E., et al.. (2011). Negative social reaction to strabismus in school children ages 8-12 years. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 15(3). 238–240. 12 indexed citations
20.
Kiat, John E., et al.. (2010). Strabismus-related prejudice in 5-6-year-old children. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 94(10). 1348–1351. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026